Adam Schiff Says He Will Scrub Jan 6th Evidence Before GOP Takes Over

[hadit]

Sure there is. Republicans have been grooming killers by demonizing anyone they don't like. You don't see Dems encouraging rioters, but you do see Republicans riling people up by talking about grooming, furries, election fraud, baby harvesting and gun confiscations, to name a few. All this is done with twisted or no evidence, so we have every reason to believe what I said, IMO.

There is no reason to read further into your screed than "You don't see Dems encouraging rioters".

 

[mudwhistle]

He literally explains what evidence they’re going to scrub.

Personally identifiable evidence.

That probably upsets the right wing terrorists who want that information to harass and intimidate people who came forth.

The pot calling the kettle black.
They want to see everything they have and not just pick and choose what evidence fits the agenda.

 

[mudwhistle]

Hard to believe he would actually say that out loud, and on TV no less. We knew the dems have no scruples, at least some of them, but the bold-faced effrontery is shocking because of what it portends. It's like saying our committee was dishonest but we'll make sure nobody can prove it. Which in democratic circles these days is SOP.

The point is...everyone knows that both sides have committed crimes....and they're not afraid of going to jail as long as Joe Biden is in the White House.

 

[sealybobo]

But, but, but I wanna talk about TRUMP!.

Okay let's talk about what Schiff actually said.

"Now, we will have to make sure that we scrub that evidence for personally identifiable information, that the evidence that we provide protects people's security, it doesn't put them at risk."

Do you have a problem with that?

 

[sealybobo]

The point is...everyone knows that both sides have committed crimes....and they're not afraid of going to jail as long as Joe Biden is in the White House.

"Now, we will have to make sure that we scrub that evidence for personally identifiable information, that the evidence that we provide protects people's security, it doesn't put them at risk.

Nothing wrong with what he said. You've taken it out of context. Typical of you and your ilk.

 

[Marener]

The pot calling the kettle black.
They want to see everything they have and not just pick and choose what evidence fits the agenda.

The right employs threats and intimidation routinely.

This is a fact.

 

[beautress]

I saw the interview....

What he said was ALL EVIDENCE WAS GOING TO BE RELEASED. All interviews and documents....and rarely and only if necessary for protection, would something be blacked out.

I think it's awesome that they are releasing EVERYTHING to the Public as promised!

Can't wait to read and go through it, just like I did with the hundreds of pages of the Mueller Russia investigation Report which Bill Barr released that was also redacted.

No where did he say they were hiding info from the incoming Congress.


Y'all have shitty, sensationalized, news media....

I guess you didn't read an option of lying that has been characteristic of Democrat evidence since 2013: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2013/11/04/the-truth-is-now-optional/

It first came to public attention during a Presidential Obama speech a little over nine years ago.

We heard the term again by Feinstein, Schumer, and Pelosi during the phony accusation by Christine Blaisey Ford when Brett Kavanaugh's hearings heard Blasey-Ford testimony against Brett Kavanaugh inconsistent with the truth just about everything she said about him and her "friends" who observed nothing out of the ordinary against her college "experience" with misconduct she alleged, when 100% of her "witnesses" did not remember any complaint or knowledge she claimed they had against Brett Kavanaugh. Instead, his past dates remembered him as the soul of respect toward women and his dedication to learning the law, his excellence in scholarship which gave him little time for other activities except being in the library a lot, hard at work, and his other friends recalled he was always studying in his room. When the lies of Blasey-Ford were noted as blatantly untrue, the three Congress critters were chanting "the truth optional," which failed with other Congresspersons and Senators. Blasey Ford was a pusher of how to pass lie detector tests to her pupils among other things to smack down on any evidence of lying. It woke the public up to other horrific teachings of college and university teachings not only in California, but across the land starting with elite universities along the Eastern Board and more.

Fact is, the truth is not "optional." The truth is required to keep this country free of lesser systems such as Nazi fascism, communism, oligarchy, monarchy, and the Alinsky method of control freakism to facilitate the takeout of ANY opposition 100%.

 

[sealybobo]

The pot calling the kettle black.
They want to see everything they have and not just pick and choose what evidence fits the agenda.

I'm sure they will see the names but the public won't. And if they leak those names, they'll get in trouble. This way, they have to purposely leak the names in the report. No oopsys.

 

[beautress]

"Now, we will have to make sure that we scrub that evidence for personally identifiable information, that the evidence that we provide protects people's security, it doesn't put them at risk.

Nothing wrong with what he said. You've taken it out of context. Typical of you and your ilk.

To normal people, hearing someone say "we scrub that evidence." Means that "we must not let the truth be known," and that is further complicated by use of that concept to swing an election to get more votes than the other party. Concealment of the truth makes for the kind of confusion we have currently when we hear the CEO in the office saying something good was his idea today, and when that doesn't go over well, the opposite is true 24 hours later under Biden who feels it's okay to promise one thing and deny it shortly after he gets or doesn't get what he wants.

 

[sealybobo]

To normal people, hearing someone say "we scrub that evidence." Means that "we must not let the truth be known," and that is further complicated by use of that concept to swing an election to get more votes than the other party. Concealment of the truth makes for the kind of confusion we have currently when we hear the CEO in the office saying something good was his idea today, and when that doesn't go over well, the opposite is true 24 hours later under Biden who feels it's okay to promise one thing and deny it shortly after he gets or doesn't get what he wants.

You guys never mind when Trump doesn't use the politically correct words so why Adam?

This is when we tell you "what he meant was".

But truthfully, we aren't bullshitting you. What he meant was what I posted.

"Now, we will have to make sure that we scrub that evidence for personally identifiable information, that the evidence that we provide protects people's security, it doesn't put them at risk.

Nothing wrong with that. You're making a big deal out of nothing.

 

[sealybobo]

An outright admission of his plans to destroy evidence and obstruct justice was made today by Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff on CNN. He said he would have to scrub some "EVIDENCE" from the final report.

What kind of evidence needs to be removed in a congressional report?

What it looks like to me is the evidence he intends to scrub was either fabricated or he's trying to edit the material to erase the committee's actions.

Or he may just be destroying possible exculpatory evidence that proves innocence or evidence of Democrat (Nancy Pelosi or Capital Police) wrongdoing.

He may be destroying evidence that Jan 6th was a false-flag operation after all....but he's using accusatory words and phrases to claim that Jim Jordan will be doing exactly what the Jan 6th Committee has been doing...."CHERRY-PICKING EVIDENCE".

"Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said that the Jan. 6 committee will have to "scrub" some evidence from its final report before Republicans take over the House next year.​

​

In an appearance on CNN's State of the Union, Schiff discussed the activities of the House Jan. 6 committee, on which he sits. CNN host Dana Bash reminded Schiff that Ohio Republican Jim Jordan will be made head of the Judiciary Committee in a few months and has promised to go through all the evidence left out of the final report. Asking if all evidence will be made public, Schiff insisted there will be transparency — to a point."​

​

​

​

Adam Schiff: Jan. 6 committee will ‘scrub’ evidence before final report - Washington Examiner

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said that the Jan. 6 committee will have to "scrub" some evidence from its final report before Republicans take over the House next year. In an appearance on CNN's State of the Union, Schiff discussed the activities of the House Jan. 6 committee, on which he sits. CNN...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

​

View attachment 731730​

"Now, we will have to make sure that we scrub that evidence for personally identifiable information, that the evidence that we provide protects people's security, it doesn't put them at risk.

Nothing wrong with what he said.

 

[sealybobo]

To normal people, hearing someone say "we scrub that evidence." Means that "we must not let the truth be known," and that is further complicated by use of that concept to swing an election to get more votes than the other party. Concealment of the truth makes for the kind of confusion we have currently when we hear the CEO in the office saying something good was his idea today, and when that doesn't go over well, the opposite is true 24 hours later under Biden who feels it's okay to promise one thing and deny it shortly after he gets or doesn't get what he wants.

Well you Trump supporters aren't normal. When you hear a guy like Shiff say SCRUB THE EVIDENCE you lose your shit. Most normal people would understand this

"Now, we will have to make sure that we scrub that evidence for personally identifiable information, that the evidence that we provide protects people's security, it doesn't put them at risk.

 

[mudwhistle]

"Now, we will have to make sure that we scrub that evidence for personally identifiable information, that the evidence that we provide protects people's security, it doesn't put them at risk.

Nothing wrong with what he said.

The only people who are at risk is anyone who gets in the way of the Democrat controlled Department Of Justice.

They've conducted so many raids intended to intimidate Trump associates, and soon they'll be raiding Elon Musk to look for drugs or anything else they can leak to the press.

 

[Catman51]

An outright admission of his plans to destroy evidence and obstruct justice was made today by Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff on CNN. He said he would have to scrub some "EVIDENCE" from the final report.

What kind of evidence needs to be removed in a congressional report?

What it looks like to me is the evidence he intends to scrub was either fabricated or he's trying to edit the material to erase the committee's actions.

Or he may just be destroying possible exculpatory evidence that proves innocence or evidence of Democrat (Nancy Pelosi or Capital Police) wrongdoing.

He may be destroying evidence that Jan 6th was a false-flag operation after all....but he's using accusatory words and phrases to claim that Jim Jordan will be doing exactly what the Jan 6th Committee has been doing...."CHERRY-PICKING EVIDENCE".

"Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said that the Jan. 6 committee will have to "scrub" some evidence from its final report before Republicans take over the House next year.​

​

In an appearance on CNN's State of the Union, Schiff discussed the activities of the House Jan. 6 committee, on which he sits. CNN host Dana Bash reminded Schiff that Ohio Republican Jim Jordan will be made head of the Judiciary Committee in a few months and has promised to go through all the evidence left out of the final report. Asking if all evidence will be made public, Schiff insisted there will be transparency — to a point."​

​

​

​

Adam Schiff: Jan. 6 committee will ‘scrub’ evidence before final report - Washington Examiner

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said that the Jan. 6 committee will have to "scrub" some evidence from its final report before Republicans take over the House next year. In an appearance on CNN's State of the Union, Schiff discussed the activities of the House Jan. 6 committee, on which he sits. CNN...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

​

View attachment 731730​

Adam Schiff should be scrubbed along with Pelosi and the rest of those traitors on the J6 committee.

 

[Catman51]

Probably needs to redact names of informants so their lives aren't in danger from the MAGA crowd. You know how they love to groom killers.

More likely to protect those who he convinced to lie for him, jailable offenses.

 

[konradv]

More l;ikely to protect those who he convinced to lie for him, jailable offenses.

Why would they lie?

 

[Catman51]

Sounds like MAGA Republicans are dog whistling to their less stable minions. Protecting witnesses is more important than providing that kind of info to killer groomers. Let them do their own legwork.

You hear the dog whistle and just assume it is coming from the republicans? Boy, have the democrats got you trained.

Sounds like MAGA Republicans are dog whistling to their less stable minions. Protecting witnesses is more important than providing that kind of info to killer groomers. Let them do their own legwork.

 

[sealybobo]

The only people who are at risk is anyone who gets in the way of the Democrat controlled Department Of Justice.

They've conducted so many raids intended to intimidate Trump associates, and soon they'll be raiding Elon Musk to look for drugs or anything else they can leak to the press.

If Twitter is a swamp full of Proud Boys, Qanons, Oath keepers, election deniers, etc....

Alex Jones got sued for saying Sandy Hook was a hoax. He now owes the parents millions of dollars. Is Musk and his business above the laws of this land? Free speech to slander and insight violence? Sounds like the dark web. I love it.

I say let it go. So the whole world can see what the conspiracy theorists are saying. Put you under a microscope. Like Truthometer does. You hate that site.

 

[Catman51]

Why would they lie?

Same reason as always, to try and maintain power.

 

[sealybobo]

More likely to protect those who he convinced to lie for him, jailable offenses.

You just spitballing here?