The American Civil Liberties Union said in a lawsuit filed Friday that California's cash-strapped school districts have been charging student fees that violate the state constitutional guarantee to a free public education.
The civil liberties organization is seeking class-action status for the suit, which accuses dozens of school districts statewide of charging for textbooks, uniforms and extracurricular activities.
Mark Rosenbaum, chief council of the ACLU of Southern California, said at a press conference announcing the lawsuit that an investigation by his group found some 50 districts that mention allegedly illegal fees on their websites, but that there are likely more that do so.
"There does not exist in California a true system of free public schools," he said. "Instead what we have are pay-to-learn schools."
Suit alleges Calif. schools charging illegal fees - BusinessWeek
I believe it is unreasonable to charge students for textbooks. But with that said, uniforms and school supplies have always been the responsibility of the parents. And many, many schools across the country are charging for extra curricular activities.
Comments?
Pens, paper, notebooks and such are of nominal cost and necessary for all students. It is the parents resposibility to supply such items to their child(ren); but, punishing a child for having an irresponsible parent seems to me rather callous.
As for extra curricular activites, I have always wondered why they are considered beyond the scope of normal curriculum.
The arts, sports and clubs (science, computers, chess, wood working, etc.) open the world to the eyes of students and many times lead to a life-long interests and a viable vocation or healthful avocation.
IMO the curriculum beginning in the sixth grade should include a required course of instructon in 'extra' enrichment (ideally I believe school should be open until 6 PM every day)
Now don't panic. I'm not suggesting the classroom teacher remain on campus and be responsible for the enrichment programs.
Here's what I think:
Schools need to make sure all kids who are able can read, write, speak and compute by the beginning of the 6th grade. No social promotion, and no 'report' cards; simply set a standard for reading comprehension, computation and behavior. Kids progress with their age group or not.
Schools Districts do a poor job of working with other agencies, the classroom teacher need not waste time on a disruptive student; county offices of social service, probation and health ought to have an equal role in working with and 'teaching' students; high school students whose 'extra' curricular interests coincide with teaching might be brought in to work with slower students, or those who need individual attention to stay focused, and they would earn high school credits in doing so; interns working on MFT's hours may be brought in to work with kids and families. I know some of this is done, but it is not common and ought (IMO) be universal.
Sports ought to be fun and less competative (for most) in the 6th - 8th grade and when practical be Co-Ed. Learning to play with, become friends with and understand the differences between the sexes would (again IMO) reduce the angst of preteens and teens. Softball, volleyball, tennis, soccer, basketball.
Again, high school athletes can be brought in to teach, umpire (referee) and coach, earning HS credit and points for their college applications.
Maybe if schools operated differently there would be less need to dress the kids in uniforms. It's ironic, conservtives applaud individuality, yet want the kids to look the same and learn in the same way - that ain't going to happen. Even in uniforms kids will make them individualistic and when punished for being a kid will be turned off by school.