Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No...You're lying...
Because you're a blinded zealot.
Marty, I don't have to defend objective facts, only state them.I am not lying. My opinion is not a lie or the truth, just my view on the situation.
You are lying by calling me a liar when you know I am not lying. You just like to use the word as an excuse to not actually engage in defending YOUR opinion, which like most leftists, you dress up and pretend is fact.
Marty, I don't have to defend objective facts, only state them.
You are asserting things about Bragg and his motivations. These assertions are supported by other assertions, which are demonstrably false....you can plead Credulity if you prefer.
The FEC deadlocked on the question, Marty....along party lines.The only fact is Bragg indicted Trump. The veracity of those indictments is opinion.
The other Fact is BOTH the FEC AND the CURRENT DOJ declined to prosecute Trump on the underlying so called "crime".
I am asserting my opinion, which with regards to Bragg fits the evidence presented.
The FEC deadlocked on the question, Marty....along party lines.
Bragg had to persuade a Grand Jury..
The fact is, 2 Trump appointees enabled what, to the jury hearing Cohen's case, was a crimeThe fact is still they didn't prosecute.
That doesn't explain the current DOJ not going after him.
A manhattan Jury would indict trump for Jaywalking even if he crossed at the light and with a walk sign.
The fact is, 2 Trump appointees enabled what, to the jury hearing Cohen's case, was a crime
If anyone wants an example of Chutzpah, Bragg just gave you a shining one.
The fact is, 2 Trump appointees enabled what, to the jury hearing Cohen's case, was a crime
Nice cop out.We could stamp the evidence on your forehead and put you in front of a mirror and you still wouldn’t see it.
"Clearly" he says.I stand corrected on my evidence statement. Evidence and significance of the crime(s) are on par with parking and speeding tickets. Regarding the DA’s privileged Ivy League background, that does not impress me..Clearly, he is being directed to carry out this prosecution.
Nice cop out.
No, just put up or shut up, as they say.
Seeing is believing, as they say.
If you can't, then a flying leap in a pond of piss, well, I said that one.
Cheers,
Rumpole,
When you see the signature Cheers theres a very good chance it’s a pompous Britt.
I am not lying. My opinion is not a lie or the truth, just my view on the situation.
You are lying by calling me a liar when you know I am not lying. You just like to use the word as an excuse to not actually engage in defending YOUR opinion, which like most leftists, you dress up and pretend is fact.
First, your claim per the highlighted is a strawman, I did not make that claim.Equating inviting a friend, who happens to be a USSC justice on a trip with buying and paying for a prosecutor's election for the specific purpose of indicting a leader of the opposite party is just childish.
No justice worth his salt accepts lavish gifts over years, let alone not report a real estate transaction.All the justices have powerful friends.
You forgot to mention he and Kavanaugh are in that unique fraternity of Justices accused of sexual misconduct by credible witnesses.They did not get to the supreme court by being shut-ins who wrote academic articles all their days, no matter how brilliant.
Did I mention the color of his skin? No, but you did.Yet . . . for some reason . . . we only see these smears against the black guy.
Actually, you don't.Actually, we know the reason.
I would call you the silliest sock puppet ever.First, your claim per the highlighted is a strawman, I did not make that claim.
As for the 'childish' accusation.....
No, I would call that mindboggling degree of naiveté.
By Allah, I did not know any of that!Are you aware that Harlan Crow paid for Thomas's mother's house. Paid for it's beautification. Bought the noisy neighbor's house and razed it to the ground and beautified the surrounding neighborhood so his mother could spend the rest of her golden years in piece?
Did you know he purchased that property from Justice Thomas, and in violation of US Federal law, did not report it?
Oooooh, what happenened to all the fruity talk?Not to mention that he didn't actually meet, or befriend Thomas until AFTER be became a SCOTUS justice, not to mention that CRow is on the board of the American Enterprise Institute, a think tank with their claws in numerous right wing causes, of which, surely, a guy like Thomas will toss Crow a few winks over drinks in the Panama sun in their lovely yacht.
Do the fucking math, or if you are math challenged, simply connect the dots, and after that, then give me a fucking break.
Credible witnesses? You mean like that Blasey-Ford idiot?No justice worth his salt accepts lavish gifts over years, let alone not report a real estate transaction.
You forgot to mention he and Kavanaugh are in that unique fraternity of Justices accused of sexual misconduct by credible witnesses.
Did I mention the color of his skin? No, but you did.
Actually, you don't.
No....not exactly...Pardon me, but that is a rather awkward sentence, are you trying to say:
"The fact is, according to the jury that heard Cohen's case, two Trump appointees enabled a crime." ?
Incompetent rebuttal; vacuous claim.
Talk is cheap, anyone can say anything about anyone.
The trick is to back it up, which you most certainly have failed to do.
The operative word is 'failed'.
Well, the thing to do, martybegan, rather than take a defensive posture, just substantiate your claim, and write your reply thus:
Yeah, right (then link to your evidence or substantiation below it).
That conquers the 'lie' accusation, every time.
Unless, of course, there is that pesky detail that you don't actually have substantiation for your claims
Cheers,
Rumpole
