Abortion is major in this election.

[initforme]

It's a crisis when the most innocent of all are murdered

The voters get to decide. Pushing and educating about how contraception is a gift is necessary. Yet some refute it's use and believe comes just have to have kids. Not true.

 

[Invisibleflash]

Yes, you should be involved. You should make your position known.

For me and my people, the woman is in charge.

Read up on Project 2025. It is not the citizen's friend.

View attachment 1021299 Get out and vote.

Abortion is a touchy subject. Not because of women's rights or religion, but because of the ramifications of the survival of America. The idiot reps think they will save America with a 50-state abortion ban and lowering taxes for the rich.

Personally I believe you should be encouraging dems to abort ALL their babies...to save the planet. When you ban abortion, all you are doing is bringing a majority of more little dems into the world that will grow up to destroy America. Abort those filthy little dems before they can even take their first breath. Suck those little commie fetuses out of those skanky dem vag's with a Shopvac and throw them into the closest trash can. And I'm all for adult dems aborting themselves as well...we must save the planet! OK, I understand there may be collateral damage and some future reps are aborted...but this is WAR! I'm not joking...I never joke. You are seeing America destroyed in real time by the filthy, commie dems.

Now the flip side of the coin is this...

If states ban abortion, the blue hairs will move to states that are abortion friendly. This offers hope to make the red states redder. While this theory has some truth to it; the reality has been very different from the hopium. What has happened in the past is; the blue hairs rally and get abortion freedom passed in a state election and enshrined in the state's constitution. And the idiot reps now find that abortion is much worse in their state than what it was under Roe Vs. Wade.

The filthy dem women claim the gov wants to control their vag. That is wrong. The gov does not want to control their vag any more than the gov wants to control my hands or that pile of scrap metal sitting in the corner. But, if I use my hands to build an unlicensed machine gun out of that scrap metal, then the gov steps in. Same with a woman's vag. If a woman chooses to create life with her vag and then wants to murder a life...then the gov steps in.

At least that is how a god nutter may view it. For me...I say...

SHOPVAC!

Fuck the commie dems...fuck them with a splintery broomstick!

 

[DigitalDrifter]

The Dims are certainly trying to make abortion a 'major' issue, but the economy and Biden and Harris' third-world flood are of a much higher concern.

 

[lafayette]

The Dims are certainly trying to make abortion a 'major' issue, but the economy and Biden and Harris' third-world flood are of a much higher concern.

That will be determined on election day.

 

[HeyNorm]

There is no adverse consequences to the public at large when a woman terminates her pregnancy. That is a fact. You cannot define how you are harmed when a woman terminates her pregnancy in a safe legal manner. You have no answer. You’re in a dead end. You are stuck. all you can do is lie.

There is to dad and the baby, so there’s that.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

There is to dad and the baby, so there’s that.

If sperm got into a vagina without serious commitment on the woman to deliver a child then the man can fuck off. He gets no input into the women’s decision.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

There is to dad and the baby,

The fetus does not acquire consciousness prior to a Roe v Wade abortion. So it is none of your business.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

There are no serious consequences to the public at large when anyone is killed. That is a fact.

What is law enforcement, our courts and prison system doing 24/7 since the Constitution was written to protect every “born” person’s right to life liberty and pursuit of happiness.

If we as a society do not prosecute and imprison those who murder any body living under the Constitution’s jurisdiction what do you know the consequences would be.

Women are not punished for terminating a pregnancy and nothing happens to society at all, Nothing.

 

[HeyNorm]

If sperm got into a vagina without serious commitment on the woman to deliver a child then the man can fuck off. He gets no input into the women’s decision.

So she gets to murder. Cucks b cute.

 

[HeyNorm]

What is law enforcement, our courts and prison system doing 24/7 since the Constitution was written to protect every “born” person’s right to life liberty and pursuit of happiness.

If we as a society do not prosecute and imprison those who murder any body living under the Constitution’s jurisdiction what do you know the consequences would be.

Women are not punished for terminating a pregnancy and nothing happens to society at all, Nothing.

You serious? How many of the dead fetuses would have cured cancer?

Hmmmmmmm

 

[whutTHEYsay]

How many of the dead fetuses would have cured cancer?

as many as would become mass murderers as far as you know.

3 out of 100,000 full term fetuses kill the woman giving them birth. The only facts based statistics we can cite.

 

[HeyNorm]

as many as would become mass murderers as far as you know.

3 out of 100,000 full term fetuses kill the woman giving them birth. The only facts based statistics we can cite.

Sure, kill em then deny their importance. Didn’t that Adolph dude do the same.

 

[lafayette]

What is law enforcement, our courts and prison system doing 24/7 since the Constitution was written to protect every “born” person’s right to life liberty and pursuit of happiness.

If we as a society do not prosecute and imprison those who murder any body living under the Constitution’s jurisdiction what do you know the consequences would be.

Women are not punished for terminating a pregnancy and nothing happens to society at all, Nothing.

Good heavens. Sell your computer and yell at the TV.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

What is law enforcement, our courts and prison system doing 24/7 since the Constitution was written to protect every “born” person’s right to life liberty and pursuit of happiness.

If we as a society do not prosecute and imprison those who murder any body living under the Constitution’s jurisdiction what do you know the consequences would be.

Women are not punished for terminating a pregnancy and nothing happens to society at all, Nothing.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The consequences would be catastrophic. People would willy nilly be slaughtering each other in the street. However the truth is many people can be murdered with barely a notice. The Green River Killer had 48 admitted victims. There might be more. Was anyone terribly inconvenienced?

If it is legal to kill your own unborn. And no one cares, why isn't it legal to kill someone elses? It's the same non living tissue. Maybe a minor assault without injury. Theft?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Yes, and selling infant parts.

Weird propaganda.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

If it is legal to kill your own unborn. And no one cares, why isn't it legal to kill someone elses? It's the same non living tissue.

The “unburn living tissue” that is a 15 week aborted fetus has never acquired the consciousness that “born living tissue“ has.

Without consciousness there is no person involved.

Killing a non person inside one’s own body is inconsequential to the other persons grouped into a society.

Killing a non-person or potential person outside one’s own body is consequential to the other persons grouped into a society.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

So she gets to murder.

There is no other person to murder. So it’s none of your fucking business.

 

[Leo123]

The “unburn living tissue” that is a 15 week aborted fetus has never acquired the consciousness that “born living tissue“ has.

Without consciousness there is no person involved.

Killing a non person inside one’s own body is inconsequential to the other persons grouped into a society.

Killing a non-person or potential person outside one’s own body is consequential to the other persons grouped into a society.

There is a life force directing the development of a human being. You kill that life force in an abortion. Just admit it, move on and stop with the 'non-person' shit because it is pathological.

 

[HeyNorm]

The “unburn living tissue” that is a 15 week aborted fetus has never acquired the consciousness that “born living tissue“ has.

Without consciousness there is no person involved.

Killing a non person inside one’s own body is inconsequential to the other persons grouped into a society.

Killing a non-person or potential person outside one’s own body is consequential to the other persons grouped into a society.

And many born living persons will loose what you consider consciousness during after a traumatic event. Better to kill them than to use public resources to save them?