ABC the cost ($) of murder in DC

It's not low. But what is low is you taking information from an agency working to reduce black incarceration to create a racist bait thread to run your mouth about black people.
 
It's not low. But what is low is you taking information from an agency working to reduce black incarceration to create a racist bait thread to run your mouth about black people.
racist bait thread or just a fact?
would you say the same if this was SLC and those being arrested were all white? nope....

not rocket science DC has a vast majority of blacks, those are the ones doing to crime

it's called statistics
 
It's not low. But what is low is you taking information from an agency working to reduce black incarceration to create a racist bait thread to run your mouth about black people.


Between the OP, his link and you, you're the only one that has brought up race. It all costs the same regardless of who the perp or victim is.

.
 
Between the OP, his link and you, you're the only one that has brought up race. It all costs the same regardless of who the perp or victim is.

.

You start out in 1954 by saying, “******, ******, ******.” By 1968 you can’t say “******”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “******, ******.”

Lee Atwater

This is what you right-wingers do. Then you try denying that it's about race because race was not specifically mentioned. If this were not about race, then he could have started a thread about the overall cost of murder in the United States. Instead, he picks out a city tht is largely populated by blacks as an example. So just can it with the denials, your bullshit gets real old..
 
You start out in 1954 by saying, “******, ******, ******.” By 1968 you can’t say “******”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “******, ******.”

Lee Atwater

This is what you right-wingers do. Then you try denying that it's about race because race was not specifically mentioned. If this were not about race, then he could have started a thread about the overall cost of murder in the United States. Instead, he picks out a city tht is largely populated by blacks as an example. So just can it with the denials, your bullshit gets real old..


Poor thing, perhaps you should be addressing the organization that compiled the report, if you think their purpose is suspect. Didn't you say this about them?
an agency working to reduce black incarceration
Why would you claim they are putting out a racist report? You're not making any sense.

.
 
Back
Top Bottom