By who?
I hope you're not talking about WUWTommy's cherry picked denier blog junk. :^)
`
By many people.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
By who?
I hope you're not talking about WUWTommy's cherry picked denier blog junk. :^)
`
Well joker..
The burden is still on you for the claim/Lie until you can post it.
And even then I'm going to bust it.
You take care now shriveled brain.
You've said/LIED that many times and cannot Link One. No Lies, Not one false.No, dumbass. Your claims have been proven false many times. You are free to waste your time, but not mine.
OK, so I guess I'm as much wary of "threats to our health or way of life" as the next guy, so let's decide two things: one is just how much of a threat this is so we don't under or over-react, and the other is what action can we take that has a reasonable expectation of fixing whatever's wrong.
How would u address these two quandaries?
10F warmer would melt the poles/Greenland/all glaciers. (even 3F+ would)
Sea level would rise about 230'.
The end of our coastal cities and much further inland.
SkookerasBil would be under water long before that.
Do you have any brain at all?
No
You're stupid as a stone.
`
You made a claim above about Ocean temps you can't even post a link forNobody cares about the 3mm
But China sOn??
The graph I presented goes through 2020, and shows a sharp rise from 1970.No, it isn’t. It has remained functionally static for decades. Your problem is you look at reports that stop in the 1970's.
The oceans were much cooler, except for the 1930's when they were much warmer than now.
Perspective is lost when the cherry pick their source material.
And they are experts at cherry picking.
Sadly, we have already succumbed to many of these threats.OK, but u understand that this would mean that neither can we say that we're facing "threats to our health or way of life".
The graph I presented goes through 2020, and shows a sharp rise from 1970.
Sadly, we have already succumbed to many of these threats.
Westwall heard thatYeah, the raw data from the 1930's was higher, then it cooled dramatically, then it warmed again, etc. etc. etc. In other words it is all cyclical.
You Understand you are STUPID right?Yeah, the raw data from the 1930's was higher, then it cooled dramatically, then it warmed again, etc. etc. etc. In other words it is all cyclical.
Poor health, poverty, crowded substandard living, failed education, widespread crime and corruption.Such as?
My, but you like to lie a lot.You mean like when they used to have vineyards in northern England and Vikings farmed in Greenland where there is now nothing but ice? Is that what you mean?
How do you think that is something to worry about?
Poor health, poverty, crowded substandard living, failed education, widespread crime and corruption.
And the lakes are choked with weeds.![]()
What other answer would one expect from a Trumpanzee. LOLBy many people.
We're going around in circles now & I'm afraid it's time to stop.Sadly, we have already succumbed to many of these threats.
lol!! Actually, fiscal policy is a whole different story & probably off topic (according to any lurking hidden topic police) but the point is golden: before we try and save the planet we should at least come by for a visit and maybe even see reality as it is.We should probably learn how to balance a budget before we go trying to save the planet.