A Slow But Steady Genocide

[Roudy]

Yeah, I am all for Israel defending itself from Arab Muslim savages. In fact I am all for Israel treating Arabs exactly the way they treat Jews and others. Perhaps that might solve the problem.

No, I think people should treat you, like you treat others.

How do you like them apples, animal?

Problem is Arabs aren't capable of treating Jews and Christians with the same tolerance, understanding and compassion they they have towards Muslims, dumbass. Remember the tolerance America showed Muslims, EVEN AFTER an event like 9-11 no other nation is capable of this.

 

[toastman]

I bet you're singing summer '69 as you write that post .......

I might of hummed a couple bars?

What's it to you?

I first read 'I might have humped a couple bars'

Man, you have no idea how much they play song in the local rock music radio station

 

[aris2chat]

Yeah, I am all for Israel defending itself from Arab Muslim savages. In fact I am all for Israel treating Arabs exactly the way they treat Jews and others. Perhaps that might solve the problem.

No, I think people should treat you, like you treat others.

How do you like them apples, animal?

Problem is Arabs aren't capable of treating Jews and Christians with the same tolerance, understanding and compassion they they have towards Muslims, dumbass. Remember the tolerance America showed Muslims, EVEN AFTER an event like 9-11 no other nation is capable of this.

Religious tolerence......

Have you heard the one about a muslims wearing a djellaba and head gear enters a church on easter sunday, walked up the alter, lays his prayer rung down beside it then begins reciting his prayers?

Not not a joke. It happened in France during mass. The man proceeded to pray next to the alter. No mad crush of people trying to attack him or push him out the door, just waited for police to arrive. Someone at the church had called them, the deputy commissioner arrived, walked up to the man and quietly ask him to come with him and escorted him out of the church.
Seems he was not totally rational. He had done the same thing the week before during palm sunday mass.

Would we ever see such tolerance on the temple mount if a jew walked into the dome of the rock or al aqsa opened his prayer book and began davening?

http://www.leprogres.fr/jura/2014/0...iere-et-prie-allah-pendant-la-messe-de-paques

 

[Phoenall]

So they got out the buckets and mops and cleansed all the shit of the roads. Or was it to cleanse gaza of all the terrorist scum that infested the place ?

Or maybe it was to cleanse off all the shit the IDF rubbed onto Palestinian walls, as they went through their neighborhoods?

They must have picked it up from pro palli terrorist supporters

 

[Phoenall]

In agreement with Oslo and everything after than, palestinians are not to have weapons.
Security dangers from outside will be dealt with by the IDF. Palestinians having weapons is endangering Israelis.
Palestinians in camps were supposed to have weapons or wage war against Israel or their hosts, but they did. They weren't supposed to fight and kill each other, but they did.

I'm sorry, but anyone and everyone on the planet, has an inalienable right to defend themselves from harm.

Do you realize how ridiculous it sounds, inferring they don't?

BTW, ever since Israel was found in breach of Oslo, that "agreement", has been rendered null and void. And that makes it un-enforceable.

Not with illegal chemical and biological weapons they are not. And not targeting children with them.

Sorry to say but the P.A. have just invoked Oslo when the threatened to dissolve the P.A.
So which way will you swing when they do dissolve the P.A. will you also invoke Oslo and demand that Israel takes over Palestine and foots all their bills. Or will you state that Oslo is extinct and that Israel is not responsible for the plight of Palestine

 

[Phoenall]

"it's possible to understand where this is coming from. And that woman, you don't know whether she's .... She wasn't supposed to be there, because there were announcements and there were bombings. Logic says she shouldn't be there. The way you describe it, as murder in cold blood, that isn't right. It's known that they have lookouts and that sort of thing."

The soldier were not going to hand out roses and chocolate. They are in danger from any and all that are still there. Every entry could be an ambush. There could be any number of traps and weapons ready to maim or kill the soldiers.

It's a war crime to target civilian infrastructure or persons who take no part in hostilities.

The video proves IDF soldiers were under orders to cleanse the area of arabs and that's genocide, one neighborhood at a time.

It is a crime against humanity to use civilian areas to fight from, just as it is to use civilians as human shields in the process. Using civilian areas makes them military targets and civilians acting as human shields become militia. It is all in the Geneva conventions


The video by itself proves nothing, were is the corroborative testimony from other people

 

[Phoenall]

Interesting how you omitted this paragraph from your own link:

"And whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country;"

So, the vote was to create a country called Palestine FOR JEWS.

OOOOOOPS! You just put your hoof in your mouth again.

Next time, read what you post, MOHOMOD! Ha ha ha. You're a barrel of laughs .

Did you read what it said. Why do you make things so easy for me. It says "establishment of a national home for Jewish people in Palestine not a separate country that "might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine,"

Taking land from the "existing non-Jewish communities in Plaestine" would certainly "prejudice the civil and religious rights" of said people.

You are so dimwitted I will now cease to respond to you. You are an embarrassment.

Aside from another mistake, it was supposed to be a JEWISH COUNTRY, right idiot? Which is exactly the problem intolerant Arab Muslim savages have had with it from the very beginning. Wait don't tell me, Arabs massacred the Jews of Hebron because of "Jewish treatment" and 5 Arab nations attacked Israel because of the "treatment". Or was it "NO JEWISH STATE NO MATTER WHAT!ALLAH AKBAR!"

Methinks the latter.

Case closed.

And FYI: Arab Palestine was supposed to be Jordan, remember? Now get lost, or come back for more embarrassment.

The child does not realise that he is destroying one of his friends arguments by posting this. As it declares "Turkish citizens" and not Palestinian citizens, and applied to the arab muslims wanting to set up nations of Syria and Jordan

 

[Phoenall]

Yeah, I am all for Israel defending itself from Arab Muslim savages. In fact I am all for Israel treating Arabs exactly the way they treat Jews and others. Perhaps that might solve the problem.

No, I think people should treat you, like you treat others.

How do you like them apples, animal?

So when are you going to treat him with Kindness and decency ?

 

[Billo_Really]

So when are you going to treat him with Kindness and decency ?

When he posts something kind and decent.

 

[Billo_Really]

It is a crime against humanity to use civilian areas to fight from,

Is it not a crime to deliberately attack those areas with disproportionate force?

just as it is to use civilians as human shields in the process.

Care to explain the IDF's use of "johnnies"?

Using civilian areas makes them military targets and civilians acting as human shields become militia. It is all in the Geneva conventions

Wrong! A "target", must be of military necessity. If it isn't, you can't shoot. Take hospitals, for example; you can't target a hospital under any conditions. You also cannot target first responders. Israel, has targeted them both.

The video by itself proves nothing, were is the corroborative testimony from other people

The video is the first time members of the IDF have been interviewed on camera.

There's no point in showing you any evidence at all. You're just going to keep making up excuses for Israeli actions. There is nothing Israel does, no acts too heinous, no actions too criminal, that you won't defend or try to justify or attempt to blame others for.

And that last part is the biggest reason I can't stand Zionists. Because you're too ***** to be responsible adults.

 

[Billo_Really]

Is It Time Israel Ends Oslo?

You're about 10 years too late!

Sharon's breach of Oslo was step too far
Israeli move into Palestinian-controlled area was serious risk

Tuesday 17 April 2001

... the Israeli army breached the historic Oslo agreement by occupying territory in the Gaza Strip that had been handed over to autonomous Palestinian control - the so-called Area A - and before the Israeli prime minister, Ariel Sharon, announced last night that Israel was pulling pull out.

But hey, try again, maybe your luck will change.

 

[Billo_Really]

Problem is Arabs aren't capable of treating Jews and Christians with the same tolerance, understanding and compassion they they have towards Muslims, dumbass. Remember the tolerance America showed Muslims, EVEN AFTER an event like 9-11 no other nation is capable of this.

Bullshit! They treated them fine for generations with no major incidents of recorded violence, until the Zionist migration imported all the hate and hostility into the area.

 

[Billo_Really]

I first read 'I might have humped a couple bars'

Man, you have no idea how much they play song in the local rock music radio station

Down here, the song is "Hold on Loosely", by 38 Special.

 

[Roudy]

Did you read what it said. Why do you make things so easy for me. It says "establishment of a national home for Jewish people in Palestine not a separate country that "might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine,"

Taking land from the "existing non-Jewish communities in Plaestine" would certainly "prejudice the civil and religious rights" of said people.

You are so dimwitted I will now cease to respond to you. You are an embarrassment.

Aside from another mistake, it was supposed to be a JEWISH COUNTRY, right idiot? Which is exactly the problem intolerant Arab Muslim savages have had with it from the very beginning. Wait don't tell me, Arabs massacred the Jews of Hebron because of "Jewish treatment" and 5 Arab nations attacked Israel because of the "treatment". Or was it "NO JEWISH STATE NO MATTER WHAT!ALLAH AKBAR!"

Methinks the latter.

Case closed.

And FYI: Arab Palestine was supposed to be Jordan, remember? Now get lost, or come back for more embarrassment.

The child does not realise that he is destroying one of his friends arguments by posting this. As it declares "Turkish citizens" and not Palestinian citizens, and applied to the arab muslims wanting to set up nations of Syria and Jordan

I've discovered that they usually don't bother reading what they're posting, even if it destroys there arguments. This is a common phenomenon.

 

[Roudy]

Problem is Arabs aren't capable of treating Jews and Christians with the same tolerance, understanding and compassion they they have towards Muslims, dumbass. Remember the tolerance America showed Muslims, EVEN AFTER an event like 9-11 no other nation is capable of this.

Bullshit! They treated them fine for generations with no major incidents of recorded violence, until the Zionist migration imported all the hate and hostility into the area.

Nah. Arabs have been oppressing and killing minorities for centuries, and they are STILL doing it. It seems to upset you when Jews fight back and don't let them get away with it any longer. Good.

 

[montelatici]

Aside from another mistake, it was supposed to be a JEWISH COUNTRY, right idiot? Which is exactly the problem intolerant Arab Muslim savages have had with it from the very beginning. Wait don't tell me, Arabs massacred the Jews of Hebron because of "Jewish treatment" and 5 Arab nations attacked Israel because of the "treatment". Or was it "NO JEWISH STATE NO MATTER WHAT!ALLAH AKBAR!"

Methinks the latter.

Case closed.

And FYI: Arab Palestine was supposed to be Jordan, remember? Now get lost, or come back for more embarrassment.

The child does not realise that he is destroying one of his friends arguments by posting this. As it declares "Turkish citizens" and not Palestinian citizens, and applied to the arab muslims wanting to set up nations of Syria and Jordan

I've discovered that they usually don't bother reading what they're posting, even if it destroys there arguments. This is a common phenomenon.

The case is not closed you dimwit. You are in fact just plain stupid, or have a poor grasp of the English language, and some of your supporters are even dimmer. Had the drafters wanted to indicate that a separate state for the Jews was to be created, they would have stated it directly.

A "national home" in Palestine, does not mean a separate country or independent state for Jews. That would contravene what is stated in the same sentence: "it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine". Obviously, creating a separate state on land owned and inhabited by the " existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine" would "prejudice the civil and religious rights" of those communities.

Now, run along.

 

[Phoenall]

Is It Time Israel Ends Oslo?

You're about 10 years too late!

Sharon's breach of Oslo was step too far
Israeli move into Palestinian-controlled area was serious risk

Tuesday 17 April 2001

... the Israeli army breached the historic Oslo agreement by occupying territory in the Gaza Strip that had been handed over to autonomous Palestinian control - the so-called Area A - and before the Israeli prime minister, Ariel Sharon, announced last night that Israel was pulling pull out.

But hey, try again, maybe your luck will change.

Only this week Abbas has stated that he will dissolve the P.A. and force Israel to take over the territory as defined in the Oslo accords. So who is correct you when you say the accords are no longer valid or Abbas the P.A. leader.

Which way will you go if he does dissolve the P.A. will you support him and demand Israel take up the slack as in the terms of the Oslo accords. Or will you deny the people of the west bank and state that Oslo no longer exists

I wont hold my breath waiting for your reply as it poses a difficult question for you.

 

[Phoenall]

Problem is Arabs aren't capable of treating Jews and Christians with the same tolerance, understanding and compassion they they have towards Muslims, dumbass. Remember the tolerance America showed Muslims, EVEN AFTER an event like 9-11 no other nation is capable of this.

Bullshit! They treated them fine for generations with no major incidents of recorded violence, until the Zionist migration imported all the hate and hostility into the area.

So the reported atrocities, mass murders and ethnic cleansings are all fairy stories made up by the arab muslims are they ?

 

[Phoenall]

The child does not realise that he is destroying one of his friends arguments by posting this. As it declares "Turkish citizens" and not Palestinian citizens, and applied to the arab muslims wanting to set up nations of Syria and Jordan

I've discovered that they usually don't bother reading what they're posting, even if it destroys there arguments. This is a common phenomenon.

The case is not closed you dimwit. You are in fact just plain stupid, or have a poor grasp of the English language, and some of your supporters are even dimmer. Had the drafters wanted to indicate that a separate state for the Jews was to be created, they would have stated it directly.

A "national home" in Palestine, does not mean a separate country or independent state for Jews. That would contravene what is stated in the same sentence: "it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine". Obviously, creating a separate state on land owned and inhabited by the " existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine" would "prejudice the civil and religious rights" of those communities.

Now, run along.

Do you mean like this which is the LoN mandated terms agreed with the arab muslims as the NATIONAL HOME FOR THE JEWS

This does not contravene anything as the Jews have stated legally that they were prepared to accept all non Jews as citizens of Israel with the same rights and liberties as Jews. It has not interfered with the civil and religious rights of any non Jews that took up the offer of citizenship.

By the way read the legend at the bottom of the map and see were it does state that this was to be the RECONSTITUTED NATIONAL HOME OF THE JEWS, which equates to it being a state or nation.

 

[montelatici]

I've discovered that they usually don't bother reading what they're posting, even if it destroys there arguments. This is a common phenomenon.

The case is not closed you dimwit. You are in fact just plain stupid, or have a poor grasp of the English language, and some of your supporters are even dimmer. Had the drafters wanted to indicate that a separate state for the Jews was to be created, they would have stated it directly.

A "national home" in Palestine, does not mean a separate country or independent state for Jews. That would contravene what is stated in the same sentence: "it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine". Obviously, creating a separate state on land owned and inhabited by the " existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine" would "prejudice the civil and religious rights" of those communities.

Now, run along.

Do you mean like this which is the LoN mandated terms agreed with the arab muslims as the NATIONAL HOME FOR THE JEWS

This does not contravene anything as the Jews have stated legally that they were prepared to accept all non Jews as citizens of Israel with the same rights and liberties as Jews. It has not interfered with the civil and religious rights of any non Jews that took up the offer of citizenship.

By the way read the legend at the bottom of the map and see were it does state that this was to be the RECONSTITUTED NATIONAL HOME OF THE JEWS, which equates to it being a state or nation.

1. No, it does not equate to being a State or Nation. It clearly stated a National Home for Jews in Palestine.. Palestine was to be the state.

2. Taking land from the non-Jews and then to put the non-Jews under Jewish rule clearly contravened the condition that the the National Home for Jews could not prejudice "the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine". What are you, an idiot.