A Slow But Steady Genocide

[toastman]

Only the things that can be used to hurt people.

Bullshit! All their exports and imports are restricted.

And why can't they have weapons?

Are you saying they have no right to defend themselves?

Because the weapons go to Hamas and Islamic Jihad, who have sworn on many occasions to destroy Israel, if it's the last thing they do.
It's not Israel vs. the Palestinians, it's Israel vs. Hamas and IJ. They are in a state of belligerency and if one of them can stop the other from acquiring weapons, then too bad.
Hamas is more than welcome to try and stop Israel from acquiring weapons from the U.S.

 

[Billo_Really]

Because the weapons go to Hamas and Islamic Jihad, who have sworn on many occasions to destroy Israel, if it's the last thing they do.
It's not Israel vs. the Palestinians, it's Israel vs. Hamas and IJ. They are in a state of belligerency and if one of them can stop the other from acquiring weapons, then too bad.
Hamas is more than welcome to try and stop Israel from acquiring weapons from the U.S.

So you're saying the Gazan government has no right to defend its people from aggression?

And Hamas has sworn on many "recent" occasions, they're willing to accept a two-state solution.

Why do you ignore that?

 

[Hossfly]

They were UN registered refugees under Egypt. There are refugees registered and cared for by the UN in Jordan, Syria, Iraq and Lebanon as well as the WB. All have been receiving aid since before Israel gained control of the gaza and WB. All are still receiving aid from the UN even since the palestinian authority was established.
It has nothing to do with any restrictions Israel or Egypt put on good or people being transported through the check points in either direction. It has to do with how the arabs, including other palestinians treat the refugees.
Camps are under UN jurisdiction. Jobs, services, etc., are all under the UN, not Israel.

According to Physician's for Human Rights, you're full of shit!


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtaGV8SU5dA]PHR-Israel Report: "Humanitarian Minimum" - Food Insecurity in Gaza, 2010 - YouTube[/ame]


Why won't you let them fish in deep water?





You say it has nothing to do with restrictions. Tell that to the 40,000 Gazans who lost their jobs because of it.





You fuckers are so irresponsible, you refuse to take ownership over anything you do.

You know what I say to that? **** you!

Nobody here has done anything except talk about it, Bildo. Go take your Prozac before you pop your cork.

 

[toastman]

Because the weapons go to Hamas and Islamic Jihad, who have sworn on many occasions to destroy Israel, if it's the last thing they do.
It's not Israel vs. the Palestinians, it's Israel vs. Hamas and IJ. They are in a state of belligerency and if one of them can stop the other from acquiring weapons, then too bad.
Hamas is more than welcome to try and stop Israel from acquiring weapons from the U.S.

So you're saying the Gazan government has no right to defend its people from aggression?

And Hamas has sworn on many "recent" occasions, they're willing to accept a two-state solution.

Why do you ignore that?

Like they used their anti tank missile to directly hit a yellow school bus, killing a student?
Who do they need to defend themselves from?

 

[aris2chat]

Only the things that can be used to hurt people.

Bullshit! All their exports and imports are restricted.

And why can't they have weapons?

Are you saying they have no right to defend themselves?

In agreement with Oslo and everything after than, palestinians are not to have weapons.
Security dangers from outside will be dealt with by the IDF. Palestinians having weapons is endangering Israelis.
Palestinians in camps were supposed to have weapons or wage war against Israel or their hosts, but they did. They weren't supposed to fight and kill each other, but they did.

 

[Roudy]

I think you are confusing ethnic cleansing with genocide. Both are crimes, by the way.

You can't think. How could there be ethnic cleansing when the numbers of an ethnicity keeps increasing exponentially.

Another bogus baloney claim, by the head propagandist DUFUS.

 

[Roudy]

Because the weapons go to Hamas and Islamic Jihad, who have sworn on many occasions to destroy Israel, if it's the last thing they do.
It's not Israel vs. the Palestinians, it's Israel vs. Hamas and IJ. They are in a state of belligerency and if one of them can stop the other from acquiring weapons, then too bad.
Hamas is more than welcome to try and stop Israel from acquiring weapons from the U.S.

So you're saying the Gazan government has no right to defend its people from aggression?

And Hamas has sworn on many "recent" occasions, they're willing to accept a two-state solution.

Why do you ignore that?

Like they used their anti tank missile to directly hit a yellow school bus, killing a student?
Who do they need to defend themselves from?

Palestinians are generally good at targeting and killing unsuspecting, unarmed civilians.

It's called "freedom fighting" aka "FREAKDOM fighting" aka "Palestinian Mentality" (TM)

 

[Hossfly]

I think you are confusing ethnic cleansing with genocide. Both are crimes, by the way.

There is no genocide, no ethnic cleansing, therefore no crime. If you think any harder you might pull a muscle.

 

[Billo_Really]

There is no genocide, no ethnic cleansing, therefore no crime. If you think any harder you might pull a muscle.

IDF soldiers were told to "cleanse" Gaza...


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Pw8m4azLcg]Israeli soldiers told to 'cleanse' Gaza - C4 News exclusive - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Billo_Really]

Like they used their anti tank missile to directly hit a yellow school bus, killing a student?

That's not cool.

Who do they need to defend themselves from?

Bryan Adams.

 

[montelatici]

I think you are confusing ethnic cleansing with genocide. Both are crimes, by the way.

There is no genocide, no ethnic cleansing, therefore no crime. If you think any harder you might pull a muscle.

There is and has been ethnic cleansing there has been attempted genocide therefore crimes that can be brought to the ICC and the Hague. If you think any harder you'll crap on yourself. Oh wait, you already did.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Huh? Then what was Jordan, it was even labeled as "Arab Palestine", where "no Jews were allowed".

Jordan is not Palestine just as Austria is not Germany.

Was not Jordan part of the Palestine Mandate? I would think that 78% of the Mandate must have plenty of room to accommodate a lot of Arabs. Jordan sure looks like a big country on the map compared to tiny Israel.

So?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Only the things that can be used to hurt people.

Bullshit! All their exports and imports are restricted.

And why can't they have weapons?

Are you saying they have no right to defend themselves?

In agreement with Oslo and everything after than, palestinians are not to have weapons.
Security dangers from outside will be dealt with by the IDF. Palestinians having weapons is endangering Israelis.
Palestinians in camps were supposed to have weapons or wage war against Israel or their hosts, but they did. They weren't supposed to fight and kill each other, but they did.

Oslo was a five year plan that expired.

 

[Roudy]

There is no genocide, no ethnic cleansing, therefore no crime. If you think any harder you might pull a muscle.

IDF soldiers were told to "cleanse" Gaza...


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Pw8m4azLcg]Israeli soldiers told to 'cleanse' Gaza - C4 News exclusive - YouTube[/ame]

Hee hee hee moron forgot to see the Gaza Hamas charter, which calls for the ethnic cleansing and genocide of all Jews.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Because the weapons go to Hamas and Islamic Jihad, who have sworn on many occasions to destroy Israel, if it's the last thing they do.
It's not Israel vs. the Palestinians, it's Israel vs. Hamas and IJ. They are in a state of belligerency and if one of them can stop the other from acquiring weapons, then too bad.
Hamas is more than welcome to try and stop Israel from acquiring weapons from the U.S.

So you're saying the Gazan government has no right to defend its people from aggression?

And Hamas has sworn on many "recent" occasions, they're willing to accept a two-state solution.

Why do you ignore that?

Like they used their anti tank missile to directly hit a yellow school bus, killing a student?
Who do they need to defend themselves from?

The Palestinians are supposed to have anti tank missiles.

But there are no reports of destroyed tanks.

The Palestinians are supposed to have anti aircraft missiles.

But there are no reports of any airplanes coming down.

How can anybody believe this crap?

 

[Roudy]

I think you are confusing ethnic cleansing with genocide. Both are crimes, by the way.

There is no genocide, no ethnic cleansing, therefore no crime. If you think any harder you might pull a muscle.

There is and has been ethnic cleansing there has been attempted genocide therefore crimes that can be brought to the ICC and the Hague. If you think any harder you'll crap on yourself. Oh wait, you already did.

Palestinians and their supporters are the kings of lies and false claims. It's called Pallywood

[ame=http://youtube.com/watch?v=uartJGBVHwU]Pallywood Fiction: Lies About Israel - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Roudy]

So you're saying the Gazan government has no right to defend its people from aggression?

And Hamas has sworn on many "recent" occasions, they're willing to accept a two-state solution.

Why do you ignore that?

Like they used their anti tank missile to directly hit a yellow school bus, killing a student?
Who do they need to defend themselves from?

The Palestinians are supposed to have anti tank missiles.

But there are no reports of destroyed tanks.

The Palestinians are supposed to have anti aircraft missiles.

But there are no reports of any airplanes coming down.

How can anybody believe this crap?

Like I said targeting women and children is more preferable for the animals. Arabs in general do not fight armies any longer, they always engage in terroristic activities.

 

[P F Tinmore]

I think you are confusing ethnic cleansing with genocide. Both are crimes, by the way.

Acts of genocide and ethnic cleansing are crimes.

Their actual effectiveness is irrelevant.

 

[P F Tinmore]

There is no genocide, no ethnic cleansing, therefore no crime. If you think any harder you might pull a muscle.

There is and has been ethnic cleansing there has been attempted genocide therefore crimes that can be brought to the ICC and the Hague. If you think any harder you'll crap on yourself. Oh wait, you already did.

Palestinians and their supporters are the kings of lies and false claims. It's called Pallywood

[ame=http://youtube.com/watch?v=uartJGBVHwU]Pallywood Fiction: Lies About Israel - YouTube[/ame]

The Palestinians making up fake stories to make Israel look bad is like pissing in the ocean to make it salty.

 

[toastman]

So you're saying the Gazan government has no right to defend its people from aggression?

And Hamas has sworn on many "recent" occasions, they're willing to accept a two-state solution.

Why do you ignore that?

Like they used their anti tank missile to directly hit a yellow school bus, killing a student?
Who do they need to defend themselves from?

The Palestinians are supposed to have anti tank missiles.

But there are no reports of destroyed tanks.

The Palestinians are supposed to have anti aircraft missiles.

But there are no reports of any airplanes coming down.

How can anybody believe this crap?

Because Israel has anti anti tank missiles and their jets are not easy to shoot down.
We've been through this already, the incident was well documented.
Calling it crap shows how shallow you are, considering thee boy died.