Wrong.
The people getting these mortgages were paying them fine for years.
What happened is that they were adjustable rate mortgage, (ARM), based on the British LIBOR instead of the US prime lending rate.
So then when the economy crashed and US interest rates went down, the LIBOR went up, and the monthly mortgage payments suddenly nearly doubled.
It was not uncovered and corrected until 2012, but it was what caused much of the 2008 crash.
{...
The
Libor scandal was a series of fraudulent actions connected to the
Libor (London Inter-bank Offered Rate) and also the resulting investigation and reaction. Libor is an average interest rate calculated through submissions of interest rates by major banks across the world. The scandal arose when it was discovered that banks were falsely inflating or deflating their rates so as to profit from trades, or to give the impression that they were more creditworthy than they were.
[3] Libor underpins approximately $350 trillion in
derivatives. It is currently administered by
Intercontinental Exchange, which took over running the Libor in January 2014.
[4]
The banks are supposed to submit the actual
interest rates they are paying, or would expect to pay, for borrowing from other banks. The Libor is supposed to be the total assessment of the health of the financial system because if the banks being polled feel confident about the state of things, they report a low number and if the member banks feel a low degree of confidence in the financial system, they report a higher interest rate number. In June 2012, multiple criminal settlements by
Barclays Bank revealed significant fraud and collusion by
member banks connected to the rate submissions, leading to the scandal.
[5][6][7]
Because Libor is used in US
derivatives markets, an attempt to manipulate Libor is an attempt to manipulate US derivatives markets, and thus a violation of American law. Since mortgages,
student loans,
financial derivatives, and other
financial products often rely on Libor as a reference rate, the manipulation of submissions used to calculate those rates can have significant negative effects on consumers and
financial markets worldwide.
On 27 July 2012, the
Financial Times published an article by a former trader which stated that Libor manipulation had been common since at least 1991.
[8] Further reports on this have since come from the
BBC[9][10] and
Reuters.
[11] On 28 November 2012, the Finance Committee of the
Bundestag held a hearing to learn more about the issue.
[12]
The
British Bankers' Association (BBA) said on 25 September 2012 that it would transfer oversight of Libor to
UK regulators, as predicted by bank analysts,
[13] proposed by
Financial Services Authority managing director
Martin Wheatley's independent review recommendations.
[14] Wheatley's review recommended that banks submitting rates to Libor must base them on actual inter-bank deposit market transactions and keep records of those transactions, that individual banks' LIBOR submissions be published after three months, and recommended criminal sanctions specifically for manipulation of benchmark interest rates.
[15] Financial institution customers may experience higher and more volatile borrowing and hedging costs after implementation of the recommended reforms.
[16] The UK government agreed to accept all of the Wheatley Review's recommendations and press for legislation implementing them.
[17]
...}
en.wikipedia.org