And I use the word "our" loosely.
Here we have an article from CNN, about a backlash to Target's reversal of its DEI policies.
"Then came the backlash", it's called. Implying past tense, like it already happened.
Reading through the article though, they never tell you what the backlash IS. It's just a bunch of speculation by marketing executives.
Reading very carefully, we discover that "the backlash" consists of social media posts.
And a boycott petition by a black pastor that has a grand total of 50,000 signatures.
And a 4% reduction in customer traffic during the month of January. Well duh, it's been snowing all over the country duh, it's winter duh.
CNN is falling all over themselves trying to make Target look bad, because Target doesn't advertise on CNN.
The morons at CNN seem to think they can "create" a backlash by gaslighting the American public. And Target's customers.
But guess what? I was just IN the big Target store, not 30 minutes ago. There's no backlash, they had plenty of customers. Business as usual. Lots of black people shopping there. And Latinos, and even a dude with a turban.
CNN seems to be in the gaslighting business. Which is true for a lot.of our media. And now that Trump has pulled their USAID funding, AP is asking for donations and Reuters wants to charge you a buck to read their "news".
CNN has been up for sale for over a year, and no one's buying. No one wants it. The only reason they're not bankrupt is because they have a contract with the airports. So they have to gaslight the public with outrageous headlines in an effort to get viewership.
This is pretty much true for all of our media these days. And Google pushes this crap into the newfeeds - why? - because CNN pays them to do it.
The real headline should be "backlash against CNN", but of course they'll never publish the truth.
Here we have an article from CNN, about a backlash to Target's reversal of its DEI policies.
Loading…
www.cnn.com
"Then came the backlash", it's called. Implying past tense, like it already happened.
Reading through the article though, they never tell you what the backlash IS. It's just a bunch of speculation by marketing executives.
Reading very carefully, we discover that "the backlash" consists of social media posts.
And a boycott petition by a black pastor that has a grand total of 50,000 signatures.
And a 4% reduction in customer traffic during the month of January. Well duh, it's been snowing all over the country duh, it's winter duh.
CNN is falling all over themselves trying to make Target look bad, because Target doesn't advertise on CNN.
The morons at CNN seem to think they can "create" a backlash by gaslighting the American public. And Target's customers.
But guess what? I was just IN the big Target store, not 30 minutes ago. There's no backlash, they had plenty of customers. Business as usual. Lots of black people shopping there. And Latinos, and even a dude with a turban.
CNN seems to be in the gaslighting business. Which is true for a lot.of our media. And now that Trump has pulled their USAID funding, AP is asking for donations and Reuters wants to charge you a buck to read their "news".
CNN has been up for sale for over a year, and no one's buying. No one wants it. The only reason they're not bankrupt is because they have a contract with the airports. So they have to gaslight the public with outrageous headlines in an effort to get viewership.
This is pretty much true for all of our media these days. And Google pushes this crap into the newfeeds - why? - because CNN pays them to do it.
The real headline should be "backlash against CNN", but of course they'll never publish the truth.
~S~
