A historian shows how the real neo-Nazis are the DEMOCRATS

They did everything required to do so.

But you guys still want to take away their rights.
If so then we need more safeguards at the beginning of the process
 
If so then we need more safeguards at the beginning of the process
We need safeguards from politicians taking away our votes after we cast them for the opposition.
 
We just think you need to prove a vote is fraudulent before you exclude it.
Well here we go.. I can play this game too:
We just think you need to prove Trump colluded with the Russians when the Mueller and Durham report says no evidence was found...
We just think you need to prove Trump defrauded the banks when no banks were claiming fraud and they were paid back in full and made a profit..
We just think you need to prove Trump pressured Zelensky to investigate his political opponent in exchange for aid when Zelensky denies he was pressured and Ukraine got the weapons they were asking for...
We just think you need to prove that the electoral votes in 2016 were illegal before you try to overturn the election....

See how this works?
 
Yeah the problem with the whole stolen election thing is obvious.
If you discredit the system how do you use it later? Now I'm not saying that there wasn't some basis for concern court cases notwithstanding... But sometimes the wisest move is not to shit in your own nest. Can definitely come back to haunt you.
It's not a problem for MAGA. There's absolutely no need for consistency.
 
We need safeguards from politicians taking away our votes after we cast them for the opposition.
No, we need a more rigorous registration process, no mail in ballots, and better voter identification on election day
 
It's not a problem for MAGA. There's absolutely no need for consistency.

Politics in general promotes chaos. Thats one thing I have to give to Obama...he may be araxist at heart but he was never inconsistent about it! Lol...

So here we are... interviewing two candidates for the most important job on the planet both of whom should never have made it to this point.

It's about time we stop blaming ourselves for our selection system.... It sucks.
 
We need safeguards from politicians taking away our votes after we cast them for the opposition.
Well let's see....about 80 million Democrats just had that done to them.
 
We just think you need to prove Trump colluded with the Russians when the Mueller and Durham report says no evidence was found...
I don't claim he colluded with the Russians.
We just think you need to prove Trump defrauded the banks when no banks were claiming fraud and they were paid back in full and made a profit..
It was proven in court. The documents Trump provided were false.
We just think you need to prove Trump pressured Zelensky to investigate his political opponent in exchange for aid when Zelensky denies he was pressured and Ukraine got the weapons they were asking for...
It was proven by the summary of the phone call and by the testimony from those involved in decision to hold up aid to Ukraine.
We just think you need to prove that the electoral votes in 2016 were illegal before you try to overturn the election....
I never said they were illegal and never said to overturn the election.
 
No, we need a more rigorous registration process, no mail in ballots, and better voter identification on election day
Again, none of that matters unless you also protect the votes from politicians who want to decide which ones to count and which ones to exclude based on who they voted for.

That's what Trump tried to do.
 
I take it with a grain of salt...

I seriously doubt The Trump has done any serious study of history especially of the world War 2 era....

What he knows about the national socialist movement in Germany during the '40s could probably be exhausted in three sentences.

Okay, why would you want a person this ignorant of history to be President? I agree, Trump probably doesn't know a lot of about WW2 History, but the very fact that he looks at Hitler as someone to emulate should be scary.
 
Well here we go.. I can play this game too:
We just think you need to prove Trump colluded with the Russians when the Mueller and Durham report says no evidence was found...

Except that Mueller did find he did, and referred it to Congress. (Durham failed to prove anything he was investigating.)

We just think you need to prove Trump defrauded the banks when no banks were claiming fraud and they were paid back in full and made a profit..

A court found he did.

We just think you need to prove Trump pressured Zelensky to investigate his political opponent in exchange for aid when Zelensky denies he was pressured and Ukraine got the weapons they were asking for...

There were witnesses in the room when he did and they all testified.
 
It was proven by the summary of the phone call
What summary? Show me.
and by the testimony from those involved in decision to hold up aid to Ukraine.
Then you need to see this: (Ambassador Sondland admits he never heard the call and didn't know what happened)

.. and this:

‘Nobody Pushed Me.’ Ukrainian President Denies Trump Pressured Him to Investigate Biden’s Son

.. and this:

Trump gives green light to selling lethal arms to Ukraine

 
What summary? Show me.

Then you need to see this: (Ambassador Sondland admits he never heard the call and didn't know what happened)

.. and this:

‘Nobody Pushed Me.’ Ukrainian President Denies Trump Pressured Him to Investigate Biden’s Son

.. and this:

Trump gives green light to selling lethal arms to Ukraine


Surely you’ve seen the summary where he directly asks Zelensky to investigate Biden.


Sonland confirmed there was a quid pro quo with regard to a presidential meeting.

Do you think Trump paused the aid at the exact same time for some other unrelated reason? That would defy logic.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom