Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 79,926
- 58,871
- 3,565
If so then we need more safeguards at the beginning of the processThey did everything required to do so.
But you guys still want to take away their rights.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If so then we need more safeguards at the beginning of the processThey did everything required to do so.
But you guys still want to take away their rights.
We need safeguards from politicians taking away our votes after we cast them for the opposition.If so then we need more safeguards at the beginning of the process
Well here we go.. I can play this game too:We just think you need to prove a vote is fraudulent before you exclude it.
It's not a problem for MAGA. There's absolutely no need for consistency.Yeah the problem with the whole stolen election thing is obvious.
If you discredit the system how do you use it later? Now I'm not saying that there wasn't some basis for concern court cases notwithstanding... But sometimes the wisest move is not to shit in your own nest. Can definitely come back to haunt you.
No, we need a more rigorous registration process, no mail in ballots, and better voter identification on election dayWe need safeguards from politicians taking away our votes after we cast them for the opposition.
It's not a problem for MAGA. There's absolutely no need for consistency.
Well let's see....about 80 million Democrats just had that done to them.We need safeguards from politicians taking away our votes after we cast them for the opposition.
I don't claim he colluded with the Russians.We just think you need to prove Trump colluded with the Russians when the Mueller and Durham report says no evidence was found...
It was proven in court. The documents Trump provided were false.We just think you need to prove Trump defrauded the banks when no banks were claiming fraud and they were paid back in full and made a profit..
It was proven by the summary of the phone call and by the testimony from those involved in decision to hold up aid to Ukraine.We just think you need to prove Trump pressured Zelensky to investigate his political opponent in exchange for aid when Zelensky denies he was pressured and Ukraine got the weapons they were asking for...
I never said they were illegal and never said to overturn the election.We just think you need to prove that the electoral votes in 2016 were illegal before you try to overturn the election....
Again, none of that matters unless you also protect the votes from politicians who want to decide which ones to count and which ones to exclude based on who they voted for.No, we need a more rigorous registration process, no mail in ballots, and better voter identification on election day
Almost in 2020. Not sure what you're talking about now.Well let's see....about 80 million Democrats just had that done to them.
We need safeguards from politicians taking away our votes after we cast them for the opposition.
That’s exactly what Trump tried to do in 2020.GASLIGHT ALERT
![]()
No, that's your fucking RETARDED BULLSHIT NARRATIVE.That’s exactly what Trump tried to do in 2020.
Now you are setting up straw men
I dont think and never said we should emulate Hitler
I take it with a grain of salt...
I seriously doubt The Trump has done any serious study of history especially of the world War 2 era....
What he knows about the national socialist movement in Germany during the '40s could probably be exhausted in three sentences.
Well here we go.. I can play this game too:
We just think you need to prove Trump colluded with the Russians when the Mueller and Durham report says no evidence was found...
We just think you need to prove Trump defrauded the banks when no banks were claiming fraud and they were paid back in full and made a profit..
We just think you need to prove Trump pressured Zelensky to investigate his political opponent in exchange for aid when Zelensky denies he was pressured and Ukraine got the weapons they were asking for...
What summary? Show me.It was proven by the summary of the phone call
Then you need to see this: (Ambassador Sondland admits he never heard the call and didn't know what happened)and by the testimony from those involved in decision to hold up aid to Ukraine.
not how it works,,hasn't been proven he didn't.
So you have Trump who is a proven liar, vs. Kelly, a highly decorated four star general.
This shouldn't be a contest in the real world.
People who witnessed the call??? What did they testify to??There were witnesses in the room when he did and they all testified.
What summary? Show me.
Then you need to see this: (Ambassador Sondland admits he never heard the call and didn't know what happened)
.. and this:
‘Nobody Pushed Me.’ Ukrainian President Denies Trump Pressured Him to Investigate Biden’s Son
.. and this:
Trump gives green light to selling lethal arms to Ukraine