notmyfault2020
Platinum Member
- Oct 7, 2022
- 6,542
- 3,210
- 893
- Banned
- #1
My words are in italics and/or brackets
I found this information at Novus Ordo Watch (which I will refer to as NOW):
Highlights from Fr Fenton article on JP II and other “popes” not being pope:
Canon 2316 Code of Canon Law 1917: One who with full knowledge helps in any way in the propagation of heresy is suspect of heresy”..
NOW says (Fr Fenton?):
It is “utterly preposterous” to say that JP II, head of the Church supposedly is not a formal heretic because of his ignorance of the teaching of the Church [!!]. (That's really something... a person claiming that the pope doesn't know Catholic teaching! And yet, since he is not really pope..)
A formal heretic is not a Catholic and since he is not a Catholic, he is not a valid pope… he is only the head of the Conciliar Church Yet by his heresy, he ceases to be head of the Church
Christ founded the Church as an indefectible supernatural society that would in truth constitute His very own Mystical Body
Vatican II focused on “freedom of belief and the freedom to be different derives” (as, I believe, JP II or some other novus ordo cleric put it)
NOW says:
Blasphemy! .. worse than heresy; it is apostasy… which does away with all of Catholicism. It does away with the very notion of revealed religion in general. It wipes out any religions’ claim to being the objective truth revealed by God, as it grounds [imprecise word] all religious belief in the sphere of the subjective and relative
This is Modernism which St Pius X called “the synthesis of all heresies”
NOW: It is also the fertile ground upon which the one-world religion of the Antichrist can be built because if God "wills all religions," then none of them are actually true.
I found this information at Novus Ordo Watch (which I will refer to as NOW):
Highlights from Fr Fenton article on JP II and other “popes” not being pope:
Canon 2316 Code of Canon Law 1917: One who with full knowledge helps in any way in the propagation of heresy is suspect of heresy”..
NOW says (Fr Fenton?):
It is “utterly preposterous” to say that JP II, head of the Church supposedly is not a formal heretic because of his ignorance of the teaching of the Church [!!]. (That's really something... a person claiming that the pope doesn't know Catholic teaching! And yet, since he is not really pope..)
A formal heretic is not a Catholic and since he is not a Catholic, he is not a valid pope… he is only the head of the Conciliar Church Yet by his heresy, he ceases to be head of the Church
Christ founded the Church as an indefectible supernatural society that would in truth constitute His very own Mystical Body
Vatican II focused on “freedom of belief and the freedom to be different derives” (as, I believe, JP II or some other novus ordo cleric put it)
NOW says:
Blasphemy! .. worse than heresy; it is apostasy… which does away with all of Catholicism. It does away with the very notion of revealed religion in general. It wipes out any religions’ claim to being the objective truth revealed by God, as it grounds [imprecise word] all religious belief in the sphere of the subjective and relative
This is Modernism which St Pius X called “the synthesis of all heresies”
NOW: It is also the fertile ground upon which the one-world religion of the Antichrist can be built because if God "wills all religions," then none of them are actually true.
Last edited: