A “Do Nothing” Congress

[longknife]

I will repeat my opinion - the word "Congress" is entirely out of context and a ruse by the left to ignore the do-nothing about the Senate. And that inactivity is based solely upon Dingy Harry doing what he can to keep Obama from having to make tough decisions - something he is unqualified and unable to do.

 

[Derideo_Te]

I will repeat my opinion - the word "Congress" is entirely out of context and a ruse by the left to ignore the do-nothing about the Senate. And that inactivity is based solely upon Dingy Harry doing what he can to keep Obama from having to make tough decisions - something he is unqualified and unable to do.

Bills originate in the House. If the Speaker cannot provide bills capable of passing in the Senate that is on the Speaker, not the Senate.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

I will repeat my opinion - the word "Congress" is entirely out of context and a ruse by the left to ignore the do-nothing about the Senate. And that inactivity is based solely upon Dingy Harry doing what he can to keep Obama from having to make tough decisions - something he is unqualified and unable to do.

Bills originate in the House. If the Speaker cannot provide bills capable of passing in the Senate that is on the Speaker, not the Senate.

You need to change your tune. Come Jan 1, the Reps control both sides of Congress. Instead of talking about getting to work, they talk about waiting until the next president to do anything. There are no more excuses.

 

[Derideo_Te]

I will repeat my opinion - the word "Congress" is entirely out of context and a ruse by the left to ignore the do-nothing about the Senate. And that inactivity is based solely upon Dingy Harry doing what he can to keep Obama from having to make tough decisions - something he is unqualified and unable to do.

Bills originate in the House. If the Speaker cannot provide bills capable of passing in the Senate that is on the Speaker, not the Senate.

You need to change your tune. Come Jan 1, the Reps control both sides of Congress. Instead of talking about getting to work, they talk about waiting until the next president to do anything. There are no more excuses.

I don't have to change anything. If the Republican House and Senate aren't capable of putting together bills that Obama will sign then that is all on them.

 

[ScienceRocks]

I hope the congress passes a bill with more funding for science, r&d and infrastructure. That way it will be doing something for the American people.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

I hope the congress passes a bill with more funding for science, r&d and infrastructure. That way it will be doing something for the American people.

What part of America will they help? They certainly won't help me nor you. Unless you are a CEO of a major corporation that can buy their votes. The rest of us are slowly slipping down the drain a little at a time.

 

[BULLDOG]

What Liberals don't seem to understand is sometimes the answer to your President is NO.

"No" is good.

To Liberals, NO is not good. They believe government is the only answer to problems. The problem with that is they expect the very ones that created those problems to solve them. What they don't realize or are willing to acknowledge is that government was the cause. When an entity causes a problem they can't be expected to fix it. If they could, they wouldn't have caused it to start with.

Great Reagan video.. Check out this Reagan video from back before he got Alzheimer's and became a republican.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Reagan as president supported infrastructure, science, r&d and education.

We probably wouldn't have a, international space station without pro-science reagan....Reagan funded infrastructure like you can't say about the current president!

As of right now infrastructure is at the lowest percentage to gdp in 15 years. So you sure as hell can't whine about the debt with it.

Time to spend money things that advance america again.

 

[BULLDOG]

Reagan as president supported infrastructure, science, r&d and education.

We probably wouldn't have a, international space station without pro-science reagan....Reagan funded infrastructure like you can't say about the current president!

As of right now infrastructure is at the lowest percentage to gdp in 15 years. So you sure as hell can't whine about the debt with it.

Time to spend money things that advance america again.

The president has certainly worked to improve the infrastructure. Sadly, the Heritage Foundation claims that infrastructure work takes money out of the economy. Who do you think republicans agree with more?

 

[Derideo_Te]

Reagan as president supported infrastructure, science, r&d and education.

We probably wouldn't have a, international space station without pro-science reagan....Reagan funded infrastructure like you can't say about the current president!

As of right now infrastructure is at the lowest percentage to gdp in 15 years. So you sure as hell can't whine about the debt with it.

Time to spend money things that advance america again.

The president has certainly worked to improve the infrastructure. Sadly, the Heritage Foundation claims that infrastructure work takes money out of the economy. Who do you think republicans agree with more?

What they mean is that it takes money out of the pockets of the 1% and puts it into the pockets of hardworking Americans instead.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Reagan as president supported infrastructure, science, r&d and education.

We probably wouldn't have a, international space station without pro-science reagan....Reagan funded infrastructure like you can't say about the current president!

As of right now infrastructure is at the lowest percentage to gdp in 15 years. So you sure as hell can't whine about the debt with it.

Time to spend money things that advance america again.

The president has certainly worked to improve the infrastructure. Sadly, the Heritage Foundation claims that infrastructure work takes money out of the economy. Who do you think republicans agree with more?

What they mean is that it takes money out of the pockets of the 1% and puts it into the pockets of hardworking Americans instead.

I must agree with you on this one as the 1% seemly don't give a damn about maintaining this country. The heritage foundation appears to be a losertrian site that promotes "government" that can't function to societies needs and allows everything to turn to shit.

If we had a decent moderate government that wanted to governor for the better of this country we'd spend more on infrastructure, science, r&d and education. Maybe we should watch china for a few seconds and relearn what we've lost. Sad, but true.

Secondly, we need leadership that doesn't turn people against one enough. The kind of good leadership that promotes a stronger America.

 

[BULLDOG]

Reagan as president supported infrastructure, science, r&d and education.

We probably wouldn't have a, international space station without pro-science reagan....Reagan funded infrastructure like you can't say about the current president!

As of right now infrastructure is at the lowest percentage to gdp in 15 years. So you sure as hell can't whine about the debt with it.

Time to spend money things that advance america again.

The president has certainly worked to improve the infrastructure. Sadly, the Heritage Foundation claims that infrastructure work takes money out of the economy. Who do you think republicans agree with more?

What they mean is that it takes money out of the pockets of the 1% and puts it into the pockets of hardworking Americans instead.

I must agree with you on this one as the 1% seemly don't give a damn about maintaining this country. The heritage foundation appears to be a losertrian site that promotes "government" that can't function to societies needs and allows everything to turn to shit.

If we had a decent moderate government that wanted to governor for the better of this country we'd spend more on infrastructure, science, r&d and education. Maybe we should watch china for a few seconds and relearn what we've lost. Sad, but true.

Secondly, we need leadership that doesn't turn people against one enough. The kind of good leadership that promotes a stronger America.

We have that kind of leadership now. Unfortunately, we also have a right wing that doesn't care about the country, and only wants to obstruct. You can't lead a bunch of unleadable pinheads who would rather obstruct than progress.

 

[Conservative65]

What Liberals don't seem to understand is sometimes the answer to your President is NO.

"No" is good.

To Liberals, NO is not good. They believe government is the only answer to problems. The problem with that is they expect the very ones that created those problems to solve them. What they don't realize or are willing to acknowledge is that government was the cause. When an entity causes a problem they can't be expected to fix it. If they could, they wouldn't have caused it to start with.

Great Reagan video.. Check out this Reagan video from back before he got Alzheimer's and became a republican.

That was before he saw the light and realized Democrats were worthless and he wanted to actually contribute something he knew you morons wouldn't support.

 

[Conservative65]

Reagan as president supported infrastructure, science, r&d and education.

We probably wouldn't have a, international space station without pro-science reagan....Reagan funded infrastructure like you can't say about the current president!

As of right now infrastructure is at the lowest percentage to gdp in 15 years. So you sure as hell can't whine about the debt with it.

Time to spend money things that advance america again.

The president has certainly worked to improve the infrastructure. Sadly, the Heritage Foundation claims that infrastructure work takes money out of the economy. Who do you think republicans agree with more?

What they mean is that it takes money out of the pockets of the 1% and puts it into the pockets of hardworking Americans instead.

I must agree with you on this one as the 1% seemly don't give a damn about maintaining this country. The heritage foundation appears to be a losertrian site that promotes "government" that can't function to societies needs and allows everything to turn to shit.

If we had a decent moderate government that wanted to governor for the better of this country we'd spend more on infrastructure, science, r&d and education. Maybe we should watch china for a few seconds and relearn what we've lost. Sad, but true.

Secondly, we need leadership that doesn't turn people against one enough. The kind of good leadership that promotes a stronger America.

It's Democrat social justice programs that have turned everything to shit. Too many believe that when life goes bad for them, it's the government's job to make it better.

What's sad is someone wanting to be moderate. Pick a path. Being Moderate is nothing more than riding the fence.

Then we don't need the type that's in the White House now. Everything he does turns people against people. That's his plan. Maybe you don't realize that because you simply don't know or maybe it's because you're moderate and can't make up your mind.

 

[BULLDOG]

What Liberals don't seem to understand is sometimes the answer to your President is NO.

"No" is good.

To Liberals, NO is not good. They believe government is the only answer to problems. The problem with that is they expect the very ones that created those problems to solve them. What they don't realize or are willing to acknowledge is that government was the cause. When an entity causes a problem they can't be expected to fix it. If they could, they wouldn't have caused it to start with.

Great Reagan video.. Check out this Reagan video from back before he got Alzheimer's and became a republican.

That was before he saw the light and realized Democrats were worthless and he wanted to actually contribute something he knew you morons wouldn't support.

Certainly before he got Alzheimer's and became a republican.

 

[BULLDOG]

Reagan as president supported infrastructure, science, r&d and education.

We probably wouldn't have a, international space station without pro-science reagan....Reagan funded infrastructure like you can't say about the current president!

As of right now infrastructure is at the lowest percentage to gdp in 15 years. So you sure as hell can't whine about the debt with it.

Time to spend money things that advance america again.

The president has certainly worked to improve the infrastructure. Sadly, the Heritage Foundation claims that infrastructure work takes money out of the economy. Who do you think republicans agree with more?

What they mean is that it takes money out of the pockets of the 1% and puts it into the pockets of hardworking Americans instead.

I must agree with you on this one as the 1% seemly don't give a damn about maintaining this country. The heritage foundation appears to be a losertrian site that promotes "government" that can't function to societies needs and allows everything to turn to shit.

If we had a decent moderate government that wanted to governor for the better of this country we'd spend more on infrastructure, science, r&d and education. Maybe we should watch china for a few seconds and relearn what we've lost. Sad, but true.

Secondly, we need leadership that doesn't turn people against one enough. The kind of good leadership that promotes a stronger America.

It's Democrat social justice programs that have turned everything to shit. Too many believe that when life goes bad for them, it's the government's job to make it better.

What's sad is someone wanting to be moderate. Pick a path. Being Moderate is nothing more than riding the fence.

Then we don't need the type that's in the White House now. Everything he does turns people against people. That's his plan. Maybe you don't realize that because you simply don't know or maybe it's because you're moderate and can't make up your mind.

Actually, the fact that he is a black Democrat is enough to turn the right against him. That was confirmed with that meeting where the teabag right decided to oppose him in every way. It's obvious that your mind is made up. It's pretty likely that Hannity and rush made it up for you.

 

[Conservative65]

Reagan as president supported infrastructure, science, r&d and education.

We probably wouldn't have a, international space station without pro-science reagan....Reagan funded infrastructure like you can't say about the current president!

As of right now infrastructure is at the lowest percentage to gdp in 15 years. So you sure as hell can't whine about the debt with it.

Time to spend money things that advance america again.

The president has certainly worked to improve the infrastructure. Sadly, the Heritage Foundation claims that infrastructure work takes money out of the economy. Who do you think republicans agree with more?

What they mean is that it takes money out of the pockets of the 1% and puts it into the pockets of hardworking Americans instead.

I must agree with you on this one as the 1% seemly don't give a damn about maintaining this country. The heritage foundation appears to be a losertrian site that promotes "government" that can't function to societies needs and allows everything to turn to shit.

If we had a decent moderate government that wanted to governor for the better of this country we'd spend more on infrastructure, science, r&d and education. Maybe we should watch china for a few seconds and relearn what we've lost. Sad, but true.

Secondly, we need leadership that doesn't turn people against one enough. The kind of good leadership that promotes a stronger America.

It's Democrat social justice programs that have turned everything to shit. Too many believe that when life goes bad for them, it's the government's job to make it better.

What's sad is someone wanting to be moderate. Pick a path. Being Moderate is nothing more than riding the fence.

Then we don't need the type that's in the White House now. Everything he does turns people against people. That's his plan. Maybe you don't realize that because you simply don't know or maybe it's because you're moderate and can't make up your mind.

Actually, the fact that he is a black Democrat is enough to turn the right against him. That was confirmed with that meeting where the teabag right decided to oppose him in every way. It's obvious that your mind is made up. It's pretty likely that Hannity and rush made it up for you.

All I need is DEMOCRAT. I don't like the white ones either.

 

[longknife]

I will repeat my opinion - the word "Congress" is entirely out of context and a ruse by the left to ignore the do-nothing about the Senate. And that inactivity is based solely upon Dingy Harry doing what he can to keep Obama from having to make tough decisions - something he is unqualified and unable to do.

Bills originate in the House. If the Speaker cannot provide bills capable of passing in the Senate that is on the Speaker, not the Senate.

What? Where on earth do you get that?

The very foundation of Congress is based upon lengthy debate in the Senate to slow down the activity of the House.

IT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE SENATE MAJORITY LEADER FROM KEEPING THE SENATE FROM EVEN DEBATING THEM!!!!!

 

[Derideo_Te]

I will repeat my opinion - the word "Congress" is entirely out of context and a ruse by the left to ignore the do-nothing about the Senate. And that inactivity is based solely upon Dingy Harry doing what he can to keep Obama from having to make tough decisions - something he is unqualified and unable to do.

Bills originate in the House. If the Speaker cannot provide bills capable of passing in the Senate that is on the Speaker, not the Senate.

What? Where on earth do you get that?

The very foundation of Congress is based upon lengthy debate in the Senate to slow down the activity of the House.

IT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE SENATE MAJORITY LEADER FROM KEEPING THE SENATE FROM EVEN DEBATING THEM!!!!!

The Senate Majority leader can make a determination that his party won't vote for bills that harm the American people and not waste the Senate's time on meaningless attempts to repeal the ACA.

He is under no obligation whatsoever to obey the Speaker and whatever garbage he can push through with a majority of extreme hard right zealots intent upon harming both Obama and the hardworking people of this nation.

So the onus is on you to prove that the Senate Majority Leader doesn't have that power.

 

[Conservative65]

I will repeat my opinion - the word "Congress" is entirely out of context and a ruse by the left to ignore the do-nothing about the Senate. And that inactivity is based solely upon Dingy Harry doing what he can to keep Obama from having to make tough decisions - something he is unqualified and unable to do.

Bills originate in the House. If the Speaker cannot provide bills capable of passing in the Senate that is on the Speaker, not the Senate.

What? Where on earth do you get that?

The very foundation of Congress is based upon lengthy debate in the Senate to slow down the activity of the House.

IT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE SENATE MAJORITY LEADER FROM KEEPING THE SENATE FROM EVEN DEBATING THEM!!!!!

The Senate Majority leader can make a determination that his party won't vote for bills that harm the American people and not waste the Senate's time on meaningless attempts to repeal the ACA.

He is under no obligation whatsoever to obey the Speaker and whatever garbage he can push through with a majority of extreme hard right zealots intent upon harming both Obama and the hardworking people of this nation.

So the onus is on you to prove that the Senate Majority Leader doesn't have that power.

Sure he has the power. The problem is that as long as he uses it to determine " that his party won't vote for bills that harm the American people . . " and you agree, it's OK. However, let the Speaker of the House not do the same for what he feels would do the same and you Obama and Reid ass lickers call it obstruction.