Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 136,325
- 28,245
- 2,180
My position is we meed [sic] cameras in the classrooms so parents can see the crap teachers are infecting children with
You have been told many times why that would be problematic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My position is we meed [sic] cameras in the classrooms so parents can see the crap teachers are infecting children with
We've been over this before.
And we will keep going over itWe've been over this before.
Yes, every fake roadblock that the lib teaching establishment can think ofYou have been told many times why that would be problematic.
Need to abolish the entire Department of Education kicking education back down to the states who do a better job educating and are less inclined to indoctrinating as much.Parents will find out how much work home schooling is and quietly send their kids back to public schools.
Not going to be the case with this little unstable glitterbug being talked about........Homophobe!
You are probably still in the closet yourself.
The greatest teacher I ever met was gay. It had nothing to do with how he taught AP Calculus either. All of the kids and faculty knew he was gay, but the nicest you could ever meet.
If you took his class, your chances of passing the AP Test were 100%. The chance of maxing your score at 5 was about 80%. I taught with him for 10 years, Not a single student failed the AP Calculus exam.
No matter how many times you repeat your pet idea, it is still against the law to record students in such a manner. No matter how many times you ignore it, parents are still free to communicate with their children's' teachers in a variety of ways, and to observe classes.And we will keep going over it
The great, great majority of education is funded and managed locally now.Need to abolish the entire Department of Education kicking education back down to the states who do a better job educating and are less inclined to indoctrinating as much.
Just because YOU want something really, really bad doesn't change the law or the many, many details you don't want to think about.Yes, every fake roadblock that the lib teaching establishment can think of
But the objections are bullshit
Definitely state control! I just moved from bluer-than-blue Western Washington to the lovely red embrace of South Dakota and the kids here are wonderful! After a recent windstorm, the high school kids were all out in their trucks, picking up fallen branches for their neighbors. Kids here learn firearms safety at a young age and often participate in rifle and trap shoot programs through the school. I feel a whole lot safer with any of the high schoolers around here than I ever did with the sullen, smart phone obsessed idiot children in my former town of residence.Need to abolish the entire Department of Education kicking education back down to the states who do a better job educating and are less inclined to indoctrinating as much.
Only in your imaginationNo matter how many times you repeat your pet idea, it is still against the law to record students in such a manner.
There is no federal law against cameras in the classroomJust because YOU want something really, really bad doesn't change the law or the many, many details you don't want to think about.
What do you mean?Only on your imagination
I mean its not against the law as you claimWhat do you mean?
We've been over this before. Why are you pretending you don't know?There is no federal law against cameras in the classroom
There are so many holes in that excuse that I hardly know where to beginWe've been over this before. Why are you pretending you don't know?
FAQs on Photos and Videos under FERPA | Protecting Student Privacy
studentprivacy.ed.gov
A link to a relevant LAW is not an "excuse." It's information.There are so many holes in that excuse ....
If you want to argue law, go find a lawyer.There are so many holes in that excuse that I hardly know where to begin
But here is just one of them:
A photo or video should not be considered directly related to a student in the absence of these factors and if the student’s image is incidental or captured only as part of the background, or if a student is shown participating in school activities that are open to the public and without a specific focus on any individual.
Patents are recording YOU and any image of s student is part of the background
You are not a lawyer and your opinion is no better than mineIf you want to argue law, go find a lawyer.
/——-/ My question was directed at you.What is your major malfunction? The comment was not addressed to you anyway!
I provided a link to the actual law. You just put your fingers in your ears and cried "no, no, no!"You are not a lawyer and your opinion is no better than mine