A Burning Question about the NYC attack and terrorism in general...

[jillian]

and how should that be done, idiot? do you take the internet away from angry men? if they did, you would be off-line permanently.

Hah! You have no grasp on this issue whatsoever, jillian. Though the internet is an effective medium for terrorists to spread their vile ideologies, it also spurs the like minded into action. I never said anything about "taking the internet away."

a lot more people have been killed by terrorism in this country since 9/11 by white christian terrorists.

Do you have stats or links to back that up? I'm not denying there are "White Christian terrorists" but am simply refusing to acknowledge the deflection.

do we take them out of the country?

You know, these seem awfully like your own suggestions, not mine. Project much?

the numbers are fact, dearie... go do your homework. but I do know that not once have any of the trumptards done anything to control their angry white supremacist christian terrorists.

no... those "suggestions", are based on what is clear in the pathetic rants of the trump idolators.

but cute diversion.

 

[The Original Tree]

The Democrats have a plan.
It was hatched in Hell but it’s a plan.
In order to push us to globalism and to create their socialist dystopia, they have allied with Jihadists and Illegals.

Once they have the numbers, and populate the courts and the voting booth with Dembot Godless Liberals, they will turn lady liberty on her head and defile her at will and irrevocably destroy the last truly free nation on Earth!

 

[jillian]

So, nobody will address the fact that every country listed never attacks us while we sign arms deals with Saudi Arabia?

You disingenuous partisan hacks.

At least we are getting something out of it. What is our country getting when terrorist judges stop Trump from banning these Muslims?

the first amendment doesn't let the orange sociopath ban muslims. perhaps that confuses you....

wackjob.

 

[The Original Tree]

and how should that be done, idiot? do you take the internet away from angry men? if they did, you would be off-line permanently.

Hah! You have no grasp on this issue whatsoever, jillian. Though the internet is an effective medium for terrorists to spread their vile ideologies, it also spurs the like minded into action. I never said anything about "taking the internet away."

a lot more people have been killed by terrorism in this country since 9/11 by white christian terrorists.

Do you have stats or links to back that up? I'm not denying there are "White Christian terrorists" but am simply refusing to acknowledge the deflection.

do we take them out of the country?

You know, these seem awfully like your own suggestions, not mine. Project much?

the numbers are fact, dearie... go do your homework. but I do know that not once have any of the trumptards done anything to control their angry white supremacist christian terrorists.

no... those "suggestions", are based on what is clear in the pathetic rants of the trump idolators.

but cute diversion.

On IGNORE after having to hear that kind of bigotry. Islam is Sociopathy!

 

[jillian]

The Democrats have a plan.
It was hatched in Hell but it’s a plan.
In order to push us to globalism and to create their socialist dystopia, they have allied with Jihadists and Illegals.

Once they have the numbers, and populate the courts and the voting booth with Dembot Godless Liberals, they will turn lady liberty on her head and defile her at will and irrevocably destroy the last truly free nation on Earth!

any other lies and conspiracies you think you'd like to post about?

it never goes well for uneducated, ignorant trumptards when they try to pretend they know how normal people think.

 

[jillian]

and how should that be done, idiot? do you take the internet away from angry men? if they did, you would be off-line permanently.

Hah! You have no grasp on this issue whatsoever, jillian. Though the internet is an effective medium for terrorists to spread their vile ideologies, it also spurs the like minded into action. I never said anything about "taking the internet away."

a lot more people have been killed by terrorism in this country since 9/11 by white christian terrorists.

Do you have stats or links to back that up? I'm not denying there are "White Christian terrorists" but am simply refusing to acknowledge the deflection.

do we take them out of the country?

You know, these seem awfully like your own suggestions, not mine. Project much?

the numbers are fact, dearie... go do your homework. but I do know that not once have any of the trumptards done anything to control their angry white supremacist christian terrorists.

no... those "suggestions", are based on what is clear in the pathetic rants of the trump idolators.

but cute diversion.

On IGNORE after having to hear that kind of bigotry.

oh I hope you blocked me you loon.then maybe I won't have to read your garbage any more.

you're the bigots cookie... not us.

it is not bigotry to point out what you are. but I know that white christian supremacists have tried that for decades.... probably a lot longer.

you're dismissed now, crazy little trumptardian snowflake.

 

[The Original Tree]

The first amendment reads that America is an open door and all creeds colors religions and ideologies have a right to force The US to accept them as immigrants legal or illegal! even if they refuse to assimilate are hostile towards America and Democracy.

Anyone who believes that should give themselves a lobotomy!

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So, nobody will address the fact that every country listed never attacks us while we sign arms deals with Saudi Arabia?

You disingenuous partisan hacks.

At least we are getting something out of it. What is our country getting when terrorist judges stop Trump from banning these Muslims?

the first amendment doesn't let the orange sociopath ban muslims. perhaps that confuses you....

wackjob.

Most of the Muslims are still permitted in the country even with the ban wackjob. But you puppets are so used to repeating what your puppet masters told you, so you go on this rant that his ban was against all Muslims.

The US Constitution applies to people within this country--not people outside of this country or those who want to enter this country. Foreigners do not have US Constitutional rights. The problem is Commie judges don't know that.

 

[Manonthestreet]

It would seem, votes are far more important than dead Americans.

They are losing votes over this

 

[Manonthestreet]

Now, law enforcement sources are telling the media that the attacker, Uzbekistan native Sayfullo Saipov, was previously known to authorities for his direct ties to other terrorism suspects under investigation. This makes the attack yet another case of what I have termed "Known Wolf" terrorism. Virtually every terror attack carried out in the United States in recent years was committed by individuals already known to authorities: New York City Terror Attack Is Confirmed As 'Known Wolf' Terrorism ... Again

 

[Sundance508]

They're going to do what they do for ALL "oppressed" groups, and that is keep standards low, spin for it, and as a result enable its worst behaviors - no matter what damage is caused. It's just what they do.

This might be a step too far in me asking this, but...

But does that attitude make them indistinguishable from terrorists? Or does it not suggest some type of complicity in the matter?

Obviously they are enablers....but not only democrats...politically correct Republicans fall into the same category aka george bush trotting around the globe proclaiming islam a religion of peace. The media is even worse....very timid in their response to islamic terrorism always making excuses and resistant to call just about anything they do as terrorism. Too many people simply are ignorant of islam and its history of militancy and radicalism....those who hate Christianity are quick to make excuses for Islam....often equating all religions as the same...absolute nonsense.

 

[Sundance508]

and how should that be done, idiot? do you take the internet away from angry men? if they did, you would be off-line permanently.

Hah! You have no grasp on this issue whatsoever, jillian. Though the internet is an effective medium for terrorists to spread their vile ideologies, it also spurs the like minded into action. I never said anything about "taking the internet away."

a lot more people have been killed by terrorism in this country since 9/11 by white christian terrorists.

Do you have stats or links to back that up? I'm not denying there are "White Christian terrorists" but am simply refusing to acknowledge the deflection.

do we take them out of the country?

You know, these seem awfully like your own suggestions, not mine. Project much?

the numbers are fact, dearie... go do your homework. but I do know that not once have any of the trumptards done anything to control their angry white supremacist christian terrorists.

no... those "suggestions", are based on what is clear in the pathetic rants of the trump idolators.

but cute diversion.

Name or list some of these angry white supremacist christian terrorists...or forever be known as a liar.

 

[Sundance508]

Now, law enforcement sources are telling the media that the attacker, Uzbekistan native Sayfullo Saipov, was previously known to authorities for his direct ties to other terrorism suspects under investigation. This makes the attack yet another case of what I have termed "Known Wolf" terrorism. Virtually every terror attack carried out in the United States in recent years was committed by individuals already known to authorities: New York City Terror Attack Is Confirmed As 'Known Wolf' Terrorism ... Again

The FBI became indoctrinated and controlled by political correctness decades ago...this is the result....a lax attitude towards potential islamic terrorists....the FBI said even though he had associated with known terrorists they did not have enough evidence to do anything about it...meaning their superiors would have shot down any type of action they would have initiated.

 

[Sundance508]

So, nobody will address the fact that every country listed never attacks us while we sign arms deals with Saudi Arabia?

You disingenuous partisan hacks.

At least we are getting something out of it. What is our country getting when terrorist judges stop Trump from banning these Muslims?

the first amendment doesn't let the orange sociopath ban muslims. perhaps that confuses you....

wackjob.

Most of the Muslims are still permitted in the country even with the ban wackjob. But you puppets are so used to repeating what your puppet masters told you, so you go on this rant that his ban was against all Muslims.

The US Constitution applies to people within this country--not people outside of this country or those who want to enter this country. Foreigners do not have US Constitutional rights. The problem is Commie judges don't know that.

Our liberal judges are great enablers of islamic jihadists.

 

[Sundance508]

The first amendment reads that America is an open door and all creeds colors religions and ideologies have a right to force The US to accept them as immigrants legal or illegal! even if they refuse to assimilate are hostile towards America and Democracy.

Anyone who believes that should give themselves a lobotomy!

You must have a reading problem.............what the first amendment to the constitution actually says.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Now of course the problem with the constitution --it is interpeted in many different ways and way too often liberal judges misconstrue what it says.

 

[Sundance508]

and how should that be done, idiot? do you take the internet away from angry men? if they did, you would be off-line permanently.

Hah! You have no grasp on this issue whatsoever, jillian. Though the internet is an effective medium for terrorists to spread their vile ideologies, it also spurs the like minded into action. I never said anything about "taking the internet away."

a lot more people have been killed by terrorism in this country since 9/11 by white christian terrorists.

Do you have stats or links to back that up? I'm not denying there are "White Christian terrorists" but am simply refusing to acknowledge the deflection.

do we take them out of the country?

You know, these seem awfully like your own suggestions, not mine. Project much?

the numbers are fact, dearie... go do your homework. but I do know that not once have any of the trumptards done anything to control their angry white supremacist christian terrorists.

no... those "suggestions", are based on what is clear in the pathetic rants of the trump idolators.

but cute diversion.

On IGNORE after having to hear that kind of bigotry.

oh I hope you blocked me you loon.then maybe I won't have to read your garbage any more.

you're the bigots cookie... not us.

it is not bigotry to point out what you are. but I know that white christian supremacists have tried that for decades.... probably a lot longer.

you're dismissed now, crazy little trumptardian snowflake.

Have you ever tried to make a post that does not primarily consist of name calling? Is that all you are capable of? Apparantly so.

 

[Sundance508]

So, nobody will address the fact that every country listed never attacks us while we sign arms deals with Saudi Arabia?

You disingenuous partisan hacks.

At least we are getting something out of it. What is our country getting when terrorist judges stop Trump from banning these Muslims?

the first amendment doesn't let the orange sociopath ban muslims. perhaps that confuses you....

wackjob.

Have you ever read the first amendment? Here it is......... "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

It has nothing to do with immigration. Trumps ban was not based on religion...it was based on a proclivity for terrorism in certain foreign countries. It did not ban all muslims...only those from certain areas known to present a danger to America because of their history of terrorism.

 

[The Original Tree]

Now, law enforcement sources are telling the media that the attacker, Uzbekistan native Sayfullo Saipov, was previously known to authorities for his direct ties to other terrorism suspects under investigation. This makes the attack yet another case of what I have termed "Known Wolf" terrorism. Virtually every terror attack carried out in the United States in recent years was committed by individuals already known to authorities: New York City Terror Attack Is Confirmed As 'Known Wolf' Terrorism ... Again

Yet because of The Left’s Alliance with Jihadists and Illegals and PC our OWN Government refuses to deport these people.

Any association with any terrorist in any way should result in immediate and instant deportation and permanent ban from America forever.

But when you have Satan Worshipping Traitors like Obama and his followers and Globalists like him in power in any office or position of authority we not only refuse to do this we actually help Terrorists and Illegals avoid law enforcement and Obstruct Justice!

 

[Sundance508]

.....And why aren't saudis on ban list?
Your unproven assertion doesn't speak to that.

Maybe Melania is hoping to get $1,300,000 in personal jewelry from the Saudis like Michelle did? And of course the Obama's took all of their $millions in personal gifts from the Saudis when they left

Yeah let's see a link to that one bubbalah

One that isn't trumpsters nonsense.

Nice deflection btw. Thanks for trolling by.

Now answer the questions I politely posed. You know, without shilling for Donald

Are you serious? You don't know that the Saudis gave SUPER lavish gifts to the Obamas???

HAHAHAHA.....

https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/d...ave-over-13m-in-gifts-to-the-obamas-last-year

Hillary Clinton’s gifts from foreign leaders more lavish than those for Obama

The 12 best gifts world leaders gave the Obamas in 2014 - CNNPolitics

Don't you know that federal law requires that all gifts given by foreign governments to presidents, their families, and other government official must be handed over to the GSA? They don't get to keep this stuff. trump doesn't get to keep what the Saudis gave him, either.

except when the Saudis and others stay at his hotels and golf on his golf courses. that money goes into the Donald's coffers.

and no, he doesn't know that the Clintons and obamas didn't get to keep any of those things. but no one expects him to. *shrug*

.....And why aren't saudis on ban list?
Your unproven assertion doesn't speak to that.

Maybe Melania is hoping to get $1,300,000 in personal jewelry from the Saudis like Michelle did? And of course the Obama's took all of their $millions in personal gifts from the Saudis when they left

Yeah let's see a link to that one bubbalah

One that isn't trumpsters nonsense.

Nice deflection btw. Thanks for trolling by.

Now answer the questions I politely posed. You know, without shilling for Donald

Are you serious? You don't know that the Saudis gave SUPER lavish gifts to the Obamas???

HAHAHAHA.....

https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/d...ave-over-13m-in-gifts-to-the-obamas-last-year

Hillary Clinton’s gifts from foreign leaders more lavish than those for Obama

The 12 best gifts world leaders gave the Obamas in 2014 - CNNPolitics

Don't you know that federal law requires that all gifts given by foreign governments to presidents, their families, and other government official must be handed over to the GSA? They don't get to keep this stuff. trump doesn't get to keep what the Saudis gave him, either.

except when the Saudis and others stay at his hotels and golf on his golf courses. that money goes into the Donald's coffers.

and no, he doesn't know that the Clintons and obamas didn't get to keep any of those things. but no one expects him to. *shrug*

Gingrich: Clinton broke law with foreign foundation giving

 

[Sundance508]

Dear Democrats...

Why send thoughts and prayers to victims of terrorism when you resist any attempt to save lives by addressing the problem directly? Why bother when you're too consumed by your own political agenda? Does this not make your "thoughts and prayers" meaningless?

Spare me your sanctimony about "the Muslim ban". What happened in New York yesterday requires far more than "thoughts and prayers"; we need action, to weed out the radicals who distort their own faith to take innocent life. You want us to have sympathy on the refugees fleeing their war torn countries, but apparently none on the Americans that some of these wolves in sheep's clothing kill indiscriminately.

I've heard and seen enough. I've stopped short of labeling all of Islam as a dangerous ideology, mainly because I know Muslims that put some of the best practicing Christians in our society under a table. Christianity had to deal with its radical elements, so too should Islam. If not, that is what armed conflict is for. We will deal with its radical elements if it will not.

Do more than pray or mourn, stop standing in the way. Do your job and put the safety and welfare of the American citizenry first. Radical Islamic Terrorism is real. What will you do about it?

Sincerely,

An upset American citizen

If only Democrats went after terrorists suspects the way they went after Manafort....if only

You have absolutely no leg to stand on for that statement.

I find it bizarre that anyone would (1) drag party affiliation into the issue of terrorism, and (2) would pretend that all of the governmental organizations that the U.S. has that are involved in fighting terrorism do not exist. Apparently, according to Crusader Frank, the U.S. is making no efforts to fight terrorism, there is no CIA or Dept. of Homeland Security, there are no FBI agents out there investigating suspicious people, nobody working security at our airports, nobody cruising the internet to find suspicious traffic, and this is all the fault of one of our political parties.

The FBI, the Obama people in it anyway, conducted a predawn raid on Mueller because they had a heads up from the Obama people at the NSA that Mueller was holding back information. If only they would have looked at Saipov that closely.

If only

The FBI apparently had enough information on Manafort to get a search warrant. The FBI most likely has a division of labor. The FBI folks who were looking at Manafort probably were in a whole separate division from those who try to catch terrorists. Those in the terrorism field apparently had no information that would raise suspicion about Saipov. The two cases are not related. It's apples and oranges. And how would you know whether the agents involved were "Obama people"? Career people in this town do their jobs regardless of their political views.

Anyway, I don't see why you are a fan of this Manafort. He seems like a pretty scuzzy character with connections to the Russian government. He doesn't seem to be very patriotic.

BTW: Mueller has a sterling reputation and background. Decorated Vietnam vet, Republican, appointed to be the director of the FBI by Bush 41, married to the same woman since 1966. Seems like an Eliot Ness type.

Mueller team criticized by fellow attorneys for history of questionable tactics.
Mueller team criticized by fellow attorneys for history of questionable tactics