Well in our state they have the right to life. If you violate that right here you will be thrown in prison and the key will be thrown away.
With the BS Roe v Wade gone............WELL WE JUST DID THAT.
Any questions................ That is the law. and I doubt you live here anyway.........only 6000 a year abortions happened in our state before Roe V Wade was overturned. 2/3rds being from black aboritons. In blue areas.........Imagine that.
Rants.............it is now set in stone..........We will decide.........I've shown the way out in many threads............BUT YOU DON'T WANT COMPROMISE........You want to listen to a BS article from the DAILY KOS......which is about worth toilet paper.
The left BS brought us here........perhaps the dang DNC could put the left on a leash and retake the party to sanity again.
I don't ******* care...............I've already showed the compromise on thread after thread. And them being GLORIOUS ON LATE TERM ABORTION brought us here.
Time for the ******* legislatures to do their jobs.
Roe V Wade ruled that states may proscribe abortion in the third trimester , because birth was IMMINENT and alluded to a potential life - a potential relative with birth requirement for equal protection - ALITO IS A GOD DAMNED LIAR that the Roe court did not explain that .
Yet , the grandiose of public misinformation and vapid stupidity of the religious reich to its constituents is that all abortion should be outlawed because some imbecile sensationalized the absurd homicidal psychopath that seeks an on demand abortion in the third trimester simply for the thrill of it all .
Rants.............it is now set in stone..........We will decide.........I've shown the way out in many threads............BUT YOU DON'T WANT COMPROMISE........You want to listen to a BS article from the DAILY KOS......which is about worth toilet paper.
The left BS brought us here........perhaps the dang DNC could put the left on a leash and retake the party to sanity again.
So. That actually blows your outrage out of the water. Doesn't stop abortion. You just can't do it here. Want to move out..........Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.
If leftist leave states with these laws..........It's a GREAT DAY FOR those states. GO BACK TO CALI.....they will allow barbarism there.
Huh? I didn't say that - are you just making shit up again?
Here's the quote I was responding to, that you apparently didn't read: "You have the need to reduce everything to just 2 categories because you cannot seem to understand a world where there are more than just 2 options.
The bolded portion is the dangerous dysfunction. Dimwitted partisanship.
* The Obscure Poster Child To Represent The Norm *
Roe V Wade ruled that states may proscribe abortion in the third trimester , because birth was IMMINENT and alluded to the state as a potential life - a wright to life from the perspective of a state - ALITO IS A GOD DAMNED LIAR that the Roe court did not explain that .
Yet , the grandiose of public misinformation and vapid stupidity of the religious reich to its constituents is that all abortion should be outlawed because some imbecile sensationalized the absurd homicidal psychopath that seeks an on demand abortion in the third trimester simply for the thrill of it all .
It never answered the question of when life begins and said that LEGISLATURES have to make that decision. Not the courts. They made a law which was never authorized by congress in Roe v Wade. They pulled a rabbit out of the hat and CREATED LAW via VIABILITY which wasn't on the docket.
Simple solution. Amendment to the Constitution on where America overwhelmingly agrees on abortion. The left WANT THIS WEDGE.......THEY LOVE THE WEDGY.........
The solution is simple. But they DON'T WANT COMPROMISE...
No. As you so deliciously point out, just deny that the child is a person. It's not like this hasn't been done before. For years blacks were non persons and had no rights.
And...........Your side will go ABORTION IS LEGAL ON DEMAND.........And then a few years later we will tell you again to shove that up your ass.
And wash rinse spin dry.............repeat.
The answer is simple............but YOU REFUSE ANYTHING OTHER THAN ABORTION ON DEMAND.........more so you try and FORCE THAT ON STATES who don't agree.
Huh? I didn't say that - are you just making shit up again?
Here's the quote I was responding to, that you apparently didn't read: "You have the need to reduce everything to just 2 categories because you cannot seem to understand a world where there are more than just 2 options.
The bolded portion is the dangerous dysfunction. Dimwitted partisanship.
It never answered the question of when life begins and said that LEGISLATURES have to make that decision. Not the courts. They made a law which was never authorized by congress in Roe v Wade. They pulled a rabbit out of the hat and CREATED LAW via VIABILITY which wasn't on the docket.
Simple solution. Amendment to the Constitution on where America overwhelmingly agrees on abortion. The left WANT THIS WEDGE.......THEY LOVE THE WEDGY.........
The solution is simple. But they DON'T WANT COMPROMISE...
When a biological life begins is not the issue , rather when a wright to life begins is the issue .
The roe court implemented judicial activism in substituting natural viability in lieu of the only other option available which is to rule that abortion could not be outlawed and that a constitutional amendment was required .
" Equal Protection Of Citizenship Is Under Sedition By States As A Result Of US Supreme Court Ruling On Abortion " * Constitutional Originalism Versus Judicial Activism * Blackmun wrote this - ' Logically, of course, a legitimate state interest in this area need not stand or fall on...
This past Monday, a child abuse doctor in Ohio had a 10-year old rape victim in her office. She is six weeks and three days pregnant. She was obviously terrified, and instead of helping her, Ohio legislators turned on her. As soon as SCOTUS overturned Roe v. Wade, Ohio outlawed all abortion after six weeks. The child discovered she was pregnant three days too late. There was no longer any access to an abortion clinic in the state, and there were no exceptions made for child rape. Even if there was a doctor who would take pity on this horrible situation, the doctor would be taking an extreme risk of prosecution—along with possibly the child.
Daily Kos is a progressive news site that fights for democracy by giving our audience information and resources to win elections and impact government. Our coverage is assiduously factual, ethical, and unapologetically liberal. We amplify what we think is important, with the proper context—not...
Stories without names, just alleging the events are usually full of shit.
Why isn't the name of the alleged child molester who allegedly impregnated the child, being mentioned in this story? That would be news we could use, especially as the alleged pervert is a medical professional.
My guess is that this is just something that "could have happened" and is being published to "raise awareness".
Yes, most likely that is exactly what it is. That is one of the left's many infuriating "debate" methods, the apocryphal story. They don't even try to make it real, instead it is too pat, as another poster said.
Then we who want to argue facts and logic often find ourselves saying things like "hypothetically if this were a true story, the girl was not "denied an abortion," she just had to take a trip to get the abortion." The left-leaning person will take that as agreeing that the story is true and not address the obvious falsity.
I'm sure the left would have preferred to run a story about a ten-year-old being "forced" to take a baby to term, but that would have been a much more elaborate hoax than one agenda-driven doctor telling about an supposed anonymous colleague who supposedly requested an abortion for a ten year old three days after the deadline.