911 WTC Demolition! The Final Nail in the Debunker/Posers Coffin!

The Illuminati Conspiracy



Yes hollie we all know about unwarranted influence..military industrial complex secret society what ever you wish to call it..presidents warned us them...



agents dawgshit and hollie gets their asses handed to him on a platter from eots as always.lol

they he can only sling shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are.hee hee.
fun fact handjob has repeated that same falsehood a million times.
 
there is no valid or verifiable "peer reviewed" papers to be found. There are, however, a lot of papers out there with a cult following of people with substantially less than a reliable scientific or structural background.

the absence of any of the alleged discoveries or contradictions not being printed in any scientific venue that could be reviewed by peers. They seem to be only on op-blogs, conspiracy websites and fictional "documentaries."


yeh like steel structures that completely self destruct due to fire.

where is the peer review on that again?

waiting......:dig:
 
say's the man that cannot find after 14 years of zealot like devotion to his fantasy a single credible scrap of evidence to refute nist's findings.
so he resorts to strawmen and inane babble...

says the fucking idiot who after 12 years claimed the bank was wtc 7 and spent 30 pages arguing about it. Did you ever pull your head far enough out of your ass to figure that out yet?
 
there is no valid or verifiable "peer reviewed" papers to be found. There are, however, a lot of papers out there with a cult following of people with substantially less than a reliable scientific or structural background.

the absence of any of the alleged discoveries or contradictions not being printed in any scientific venue that could be reviewed by peers. They seem to be only on op-blogs, conspiracy websites and fictional "documentaries."


yeh like steel structures that completely self destruct due to fire.

where is the peer review on that again?

waiting......:dig:
odd noone has ever claimed that but you.
 
say's the man that cannot find after 14 years of zealot like devotion to his fantasy a single credible scrap of evidence to refute nist's findings.
so he resorts to strawmen and inane babble...

says the fucking idiot who after 12 years claimed the bank was wtc 7 and spent 30 pages arguing about it. Did you ever pull your head far enough out of your ass to figure that out yet?
not even one page it was you who went batshit over it for the next 29 and 1/2 pages....
exaggeration another credibility problem you ass hats have.
you're the worst twoof there is a no plane dolt.
 
yeh like steel structures that completely self destruct due to fire.

where is the peer review on that again?

waiting......:dig:
odd noone has ever claimed that but you.

So now you dont even know what we are talking about? No surprise there. LOL[/QUOTE]

say's the man that cannot find after 14 years of zealot like devotion to his fantasy a single credible scrap of evidence to refute nist's findings.
so he resorts to strawmen and inane babble...

says the fucking idiot who after 12 years claimed the bank was wtc 7 and spent 30 pages arguing about it. Did you ever pull your head far enough out of your ass to figure that out yet?
not even one page it was you who went batshit over it for the next 29 and 1/2 pages....
exaggeration another credibility problem you ass hats have.
you're the worst twoof there is a no plane dolt.

we all got a great laugh out of it! Even after it was brought to your attention you still claimed the bank was wtc 7 and even after pictures were posted you still demanded that the bank was wtc 7. Meanwhile another nail in the poser duhbwunker movement coffin!
 
yeh like steel structures that completely self destruct due to fire.

where is the peer review on that again?

waiting......:dig:
odd noone has ever claimed that but you.

So now you dont even know what we are talking about? No surprise there. LOL

say's the man that cannot find after 14 years of zealot like devotion to his fantasy a single credible scrap of evidence to refute nist's findings.
so he resorts to strawmen and inane babble...

says the fucking idiot who after 12 years claimed the bank was wtc 7 and spent 30 pages arguing about it. Did you ever pull your head far enough out of your ass to figure that out yet?
not even one page it was you who went batshit over it for the next 29 and 1/2 pages....
exaggeration another credibility problem you ass hats have.
you're the worst twoof there is a no plane dolt.

we all got a great laugh out of it! Even after it was brought to your attention you still claimed the bank was wtc 7 and even after pictures were posted you still demanded that the bank was wtc 7. Meanwhile another nail in the poser duhbwunker movement coffin![/QUOTE]
A decade and a half past 9/11 and you conspiracy theory loons are still chasing the same conspiracy theories long ago discredited.

You may want to move on to alien abductions and anal probing. Bring your fantasies to life.
 
yeh like steel structures that completely self destruct due to fire.

where is the peer review on that again?

waiting......:dig:
odd noone has ever claimed that but you.

So now you dont even know what we are talking about? No surprise there. LOL

say's the man that cannot find after 14 years of zealot like devotion to his fantasy a single credible scrap of evidence to refute nist's findings.
so he resorts to strawmen and inane babble...

says the fucking idiot who after 12 years claimed the bank was wtc 7 and spent 30 pages arguing about it. Did you ever pull your head far enough out of your ass to figure that out yet?
not even one page it was you who went batshit over it for the next 29 and 1/2 pages....
exaggeration another credibility problem you ass hats have.
you're the worst twoof there is a no plane dolt.

we all got a great laugh out of it! Even after it was brought to your attention you still claimed the bank was wtc 7 and even after pictures were posted you still demanded that the bank was wtc 7. Meanwhile another nail in the poser duhbwunker movement coffin![/QUOTE]who is "we"? we got a huge laugh out of you going batshit.
to put it another way. I and others like me can and do make mistakes .
on the other hand everything you asshats post must be absolute fact if only one tiny piece of your "theory" is wrong it all goes in the shitter.
fact is, it already has.
 
yeh like steel structures that completely self destruct due to fire.

where is the peer review on that again?

waiting......:dig:
odd noone has ever claimed that but you.

So now you dont even know what we are talking about? No surprise there. LOL

say's the man that cannot find after 14 years of zealot like devotion to his fantasy a single credible scrap of evidence to refute nist's findings.
so he resorts to strawmen and inane babble...

says the fucking idiot who after 12 years claimed the bank was wtc 7 and spent 30 pages arguing about it. Did you ever pull your head far enough out of your ass to figure that out yet?
not even one page it was you who went batshit over it for the next 29 and 1/2 pages....
exaggeration another credibility problem you ass hats have.
you're the worst twoof there is a no plane dolt.

we all got a great laugh out of it! Even after it was brought to your attention you still claimed the bank was wtc 7 and even after pictures were posted you still demanded that the bank was wtc 7. Meanwhile another nail in the poser duhbwunker movement coffin!
who is "we"? we got a huge laugh out of you going batshit.
to put it another way. I and others like me can and do make mistakes .
on the other hand everything you asshats post must be absolute fact if only one tiny piece of your "theory" is wrong it all goes in the shitter.
fact is, it already has.[/QUOTE]

yes you and others like you make 'mostly' mistakes, at least you finally have the balls to admit it 5years too late.
 
yeh like steel structures that completely self destruct due to fire.

where is the peer review on that again?

waiting......:dig:
odd noone has ever claimed that but you.

So now you dont even know what we are talking about? No surprise there. LOL

say's the man that cannot find after 14 years of zealot like devotion to his fantasy a single credible scrap of evidence to refute nist's findings.
so he resorts to strawmen and inane babble...

says the fucking idiot who after 12 years claimed the bank was wtc 7 and spent 30 pages arguing about it. Did you ever pull your head far enough out of your ass to figure that out yet?
not even one page it was you who went batshit over it for the next 29 and 1/2 pages....
exaggeration another credibility problem you ass hats have.
you're the worst twoof there is a no plane dolt.

we all got a great laugh out of it! Even after it was brought to your attention you still claimed the bank was wtc 7 and even after pictures were posted you still demanded that the bank was wtc 7. Meanwhile another nail in the poser duhbwunker movement coffin!
who is "we"? we got a huge laugh out of you going batshit.
to put it another way. I and others like me can and do make mistakes .
on the other hand everything you asshats post must be absolute fact if only one tiny piece of your "theory" is wrong it all goes in the shitter.
fact is, it already has.

yes you and others like you make 'mostly' mistakes, at least you finally have the balls to admit it 5years too late.[/QUOTE]you haven't been on this site for 5 years. you join date is 10 /02 /13 not even two years. if you can't keep that straight, you can't expect anyone who is not brain damaged to buy into your shit.
like I said :
on the other hand everything you asshats post must be absolute fact if only one tiny piece of your "theory" is wrong it all goes in the shitter.
fact is, it already has!
 
yeh like steel structures that completely self destruct due to fire.

where is the peer review on that again?

waiting......:dig:
odd noone has ever claimed that but you.

So now you dont even know what we are talking about? No surprise there. LOL

say's the man that cannot find after 14 years of zealot like devotion to his fantasy a single credible scrap of evidence to refute nist's findings.
so he resorts to strawmen and inane babble...

says the fucking idiot who after 12 years claimed the bank was wtc 7 and spent 30 pages arguing about it. Did you ever pull your head far enough out of your ass to figure that out yet?
not even one page it was you who went batshit over it for the next 29 and 1/2 pages....
exaggeration another credibility problem you ass hats have.
you're the worst twoof there is a no plane dolt.

we all got a great laugh out of it! Even after it was brought to your attention you still claimed the bank was wtc 7 and even after pictures were posted you still demanded that the bank was wtc 7. Meanwhile another nail in the poser duhbwunker movement coffin!
who is "we"? we got a huge laugh out of you going batshit.
to put it another way. I and others like me can and do make mistakes .
on the other hand everything you asshats post must be absolute fact if only one tiny piece of your "theory" is wrong it all goes in the shitter.
fact is, it already has.

yes you and others like you make 'mostly' mistakes, at least you finally have the balls to admit it 5years too late.
you haven't been on this site for 5 years. you join date is 10 /02 /13 not even two years. if you can't keep that straight, you can't expect anyone who is not brain damaged to buy into your shit.
like I said :
on the other hand everything you asshats post must be absolute fact if only one tiny piece of your "theory" is wrong it all goes in the shitter.
fact is, it already has!
that was a euphemism, DUH

You are a genius in your own wrong.
 
odd noone has ever claimed that but you.

So now you dont even know what we are talking about? No surprise there. LOL

says the fucking idiot who after 12 years claimed the bank was wtc 7 and spent 30 pages arguing about it. Did you ever pull your head far enough out of your ass to figure that out yet?
not even one page it was you who went batshit over it for the next 29 and 1/2 pages....
exaggeration another credibility problem you ass hats have.
you're the worst twoof there is a no plane dolt.

we all got a great laugh out of it! Even after it was brought to your attention you still claimed the bank was wtc 7 and even after pictures were posted you still demanded that the bank was wtc 7. Meanwhile another nail in the poser duhbwunker movement coffin!
who is "we"? we got a huge laugh out of you going batshit.
to put it another way. I and others like me can and do make mistakes .
on the other hand everything you asshats post must be absolute fact if only one tiny piece of your "theory" is wrong it all goes in the shitter.
fact is, it already has.

yes you and others like you make 'mostly' mistakes, at least you finally have the balls to admit it 5years too late.
you haven't been on this site for 5 years. you join date is 10 /02 /13 not even two years. if you can't keep that straight, you can't expect anyone who is not brain damaged to buy into your shit.
like I said :
on the other hand everything you asshats post must be absolute fact if only one tiny piece of your "theory" is wrong it all goes in the shitter.
fact is, it already has!
that was a euphemism, DUH

You are a genius in your own wrong.
right ..sure it was ......
 
I have to say, i'm now leaning towards Demolition. Three buildings collapsing so perfectly into their own footprints? Highly unlikely, if not impossible. It just doesn't happen.
 
I have to say, i'm now leaning towards Demolition. Three buildings collapsing so perfectly into their own footprints? Highly unlikely, if not impossible. It just doesn't happen.


bld 7 is the crux of the 9/11 coverup that disinfo agents such as dawgshit-aka sayit,rat in the ass,hollie,irosie,gomer pyle ollie and others cant get around and have to invent lies when losing an argument to try and save face in defeat.
 
Nice try Fabiani.major fail though.

Report NFL not considering an L.A. delay ProFootballTalk

Any delay is not up to the league. Mr. Stan Kroenke controls the relocation issue and nobody else. That includes Roger Goodell, Dean Spanos, Mark Davis, the city of Oakland, the city of San Diego, the city of Carson and the city of St. Louis.

Mr. Kroenke may….or may NOT……allow another team to use his stadium and call it as thier home.
That decision is his alone, NOT the leagues.
If the Raiders or Chargers want to be based in Inglewood, they better be prepared to do so under Mr. Kroenke’s terms.

So in other words- Krunky IS taking the Rams whether the rest like it or not and this is all negotiation on the “relocation fee”.

Which will be about $1.00

Kroenke is building his stadium in Inglewood with his own money. He doesn’t have to share it with anybody. And why would he?

Why is the NFL operating under the delusion that they control this? Everyone involved knows they don’t.

You obviously are off your meds again ... waaaay off.
somebody explain this, how are LA'S lack of ability to get and keep a football team a part of the 911 saga...?
 
I see your handlers sent you here to fart immediately worried about trying to derail a truth discussion dawgshit.:biggrin::banana:
 

Forum List

Back
Top