88 million Voters should sue Trump for the attempt to subvert our right to evict him from the White House with our votes.

They hate President Trump.
If you were a true American you would hate President Trump just like I do. I am more proud of it more than ever. Watch the hearing. Your mom is threatening to hang Mike Pence for defending democracy
 
Are you a socialist? do you want Biden to give you a five year plan for our federal government it’s to make sure all shelves are stocked at all times, wage and price controls confiscation of private property? Bring back 55 mile an hour laws?
bring back 2.50 a gallon gas and stock our stores with the supplies floating in the Pacific.
 
If you were a true American you would hate President Trump just like I do. I am more proud of it more than ever. Watch the hearing. Your mom is threatening to hang Mike Pence for defending democracy
Oh so now you think Trump isn't an american, nor the 74k who voted for him? interesting. you are truly a fool.
 
You are terrified of MAGA.
I love retired Judge Luddig who just just spoke at the hearing.

The rotted head at the head of a MAGA is going down. He will be indicted. So no I am not terrified of MAGA.

if you watch the hearing you will know why.
 
Last edited:
Oh so now you think Trump isn't an american
Trump is not an American because he is a fascist.

I voted for his opponent in 2020. His opponent won the election. On December 14th all 50 states certified their elections. It was over. Trump lost. I am seeing evidence that Trump conspired even with members of Congress to implement a scheme that discarded my vote as if it meant absolutely nothing. The scheme was trumps means to attempt to stay in power and basically shit on my constitutional right to vote for who I want to be president of United States. He does not respect my rights so I have no choice to conclude but to conclude the fact that he is a fascist and his power over the American people Who rejected him. including me, is more important than the constitution. That is fact? that is reality? that is undeniable. Your guy is a fascist.
 
You must be watching. Give me an example of something that is doctored.
They doctored text messages of his staff.

They edited President Trump’s speech, taking out his actual statement of keeping the protests “patriotic and peaceful”.

They did not show video of Capitol Police allowing protesters in.

Did they mention the people that died that day? All peaceful protesters.
 
An actual Congressional hearing would have to allow the opposition to present their evidence,

Trump supporters have all been trying to hide but they know from the committee. Community would welcome any Trump supporter who wanted to testify and present opposition evidence to join. Why isn’t band and they’re telling Trump side?

Ryan Goodman, former special counsel to the Department of Defense, cited 18 US §1512, which makes it illegal to corruptly obstruct an official congressional proceeding.​
The official proceeding on January 6 was in fact obstructed by forces that Trump assembled on January 6 to “STOP the Steal, STOP means STOP.
 
They edited President Trump’s speech, taking out his actual statement of keeping the protests “patriotic and peaceful”.
You are a stinking liar. We’re not even talking about the violence in today’s hearing. It’s the inside coup you flaming idiot.

I’m on record hear that Trump is not responsible and didn’t need or want violence at the capital. He wanted parents to obstruct it and create chaos
 
I love retired Judge Luddig who just just spoke at the hearing.

The rotted head at the head of a MAGA is going down. He will be indicted. So no I am not terrified of MAGA.

if you watch the hearing you will know why.
You see, this is exactly what I am talking about. Judge Luddig is a nobody that retired a long, long time ago. He has no connection whatsoever to any of this and has no information to give, just his opinion. He’s yet another Bush Globalist, used to be the VP of Boeing. He’s a Bush stooge and here you are gleefully swallowing whatever he says.
 
Trump supporters have all been trying to hide but they know from the committee. Community would welcome any Trump supporter who wanted to testify and present opposition evidence to join. Why isn’t band and they’re telling Trump side?

Ryan Goodman, former special counsel to the Department of Defense, cited 18 US §1512, which makes it illegal to corruptly obstruct an official congressional proceeding.​
The official proceeding on January 6 was in fact obstructed by forces that Trump assembled on January 6 to “STOP the Steal, STOP means STOP.
Why would they want to testify at a staged freakshow? Why not let them testify in an actual Congressional hearing? Why not let the other side call witnesses? Because they know the left, Nancy and her gang would be exposed.
 
Why would they want to testify at a staged freakshow?
To present the truth if they have some. I don’t see how they can have any.. It’s in trumps on words when he announced to the public that he’s trying to do a coup.

The Eastman memo defined exactly how to pull off the coup is not in dispute.

DJTtweet8:17* January 6, 2021 8:17 a.m.: Trump tweets: "States want to correct their votes, which they now know were based on irregularities and fraud, plus corrupt process never received legislative approval. All Mike Pence has to do is send them back to the States, AND WE WIN. Do it Mike, this is a time for extreme courage!" 21JAN06-DJTtweet8:17


.. and the only way for Trump to say “we win” would be for the coolest attempt to be successful. That is a fact no Trump supporter can sit before a committee and change that fact.
 
To present the truth if they have some. I don’t see how they can have any.. It’s in trumps on words when he announced to the public that he’s trying to do a coup.

The Eastman memo defined exactly how to pull off the coup is not in dispute.

DJTtweet8:17* January 6, 2021 8:17 a.m.: Trump tweets: "States want to correct their votes, which they now know were based on irregularities and fraud, plus corrupt process never received legislative approval. All Mike Pence has to do is send them back to the States, AND WE WIN. Do it Mike, this is a time for extreme courage!" 21JAN06-DJTtweet8:17


.. and the only way for Trump to say “we win” would be for the coolest attempt to be successful. That is a fact no Trump supporter can sit before a committee and change that fact.
So? If the states did audits and found much of it to be fraudulen (as they now have), then he was 100% correct. It was rigged, and stolen.
 
If the states did audits and found much of it to be fraudulen (as they now have), then he was 100% correct. It was rigged, and stolen.

(as they now have) No state did audits and found any of their original certified elections be fraudulent. You are lying.
 
. An actual Congressional hearing would have to allow the opposition to present their evidence, which of course the Dems and anti-Trumpers can’t allow.

I mean if Trump is as innocent as he claims, he writes a letter to the committee that he will come to them to defend his honor. He will not plead the fifth and truthfull answer any question that is asked of him,

yes truthfully. he can’t agree to that can he.
 
Yes. Conspiracy happened.



Why was Eastman trying to hide his documents from the select committee? This was a big loss for Trump//Eastman:

As part of the suit, Mr. Eastman sought to shield from release documents he said were covered by attorney-client privilege. In response, the committee argued — under the legal theory known as the crime-fraud exception — that the privilege does not cover information conveyed from a client to a lawyer if it was part of furthering or concealing a crime.​

Mr. Eastman then argued the committee had offered “no evidence” of the existence of a crime-fraud exception, prompting the committee’s latest filing.​
“The evidence supports an inference that President Trump, plaintiff and several others entered into an email agreement to defraud the United States by interfering with the election certification process, disseminating false information about election fraud, and pressuring state officials to alter state election results and federal officials to assist in that effort,” the filing states.

It also made reference to a recent ruling in a civil suit in Washington, D.C., in which Judge Amit P. Mehta of the Federal District Court found that it was “plausible to believe that the president entered into a conspiracy with the rioters on Jan. 6, 2021.

See Link Below;



Do not need luck / We have trumps co-conspirator named John Eastman.

The committee issued a subpoena to Mr. Eastman in January, citing a memo he wrote laying out how Mr. Trump could use the vice president and Congress to try to invalidate the 2020 election results. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/02/us/politics/trump-criminal-charges-jan-6.htmli
Maybe just maybe you guys shouldn't go around stealing elections . Ever think of that ?
 
Maybe just maybe you guys shouldn't go around stealing elections .

Why are you aiding and abetting Trump’s “common law fraud”


I am sure you are compiling evidence to back up the criminal charges that you made.


There is compelling evidence that Trump knew that when he was asking Mike Pence to do was against the law.

The evidence against Trump in Eastman are mountainous and solid:


WASHINGTON — The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol said on Wednesday that there was enough evidence to conclude that former President Donald J. Trump and some of his allies might have conspired to commit fraud and obstruction by misleading Americans about the outcome of the 2020 election and oattempting to overturn the result.​

In a court filing in a civil case in California, the committee’s lawyers for the first time laid out their theory of a potential criminal case against the former president. They said they had accumulated evidence demonstrating that Mr. Trump, the conservative lawyer John Eastman and other allies could potentially be charged with criminal violations including obstructing an official proceeding of Congress and conspiracy to defraud the American people.
The filing also said there was evidence that Mr. Trump’s repeated lies that the election had been stolen amounted to common law fraud.
 
Why are you aiding and abetting Trump’s “common law fraud”


I am sure you are compiling evidence to back up the criminal charges that you made.


There is compelling evidence that Trump knew that when he was asking Mike Pence to do was against the law.

The evidence against Trump in Eastman are mountainous and solid:


WASHINGTON — The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol said on Wednesday that there was enough evidence to conclude that former President Donald J. Trump and some of his allies might have conspired to commit fraud and obstruction by misleading Americans about the outcome of the 2020 election and oattempting to overturn the result.​

In a court filing in a civil case in California, the committee’s lawyers for the first time laid out their theory of a potential criminal case against the former president. They said they had accumulated evidence demonstrating that Mr. Trump, the conservative lawyer John Eastman and other allies could potentially be charged with criminal violations including obstructing an official proceeding of Congress and conspiracy to defraud the American people.
The filing also said there was evidence that Mr. Trump’s repeated lies that the election had been stolen amounted to common law fraud.
The only frauds are you never trumpers, with TDS .
 
The only frauds are you never trumpers, with TDS .

So I guess you are saying that I am in the same company with Judge Michael Luttig

An ultra conservative Judge ranking as high as Alito and Scalia as far as his conservative bonafides go snd he considers Trump
a clear and present danger to democracy.”

J. Michael Luttig, a former federal judge and conservative legal expert who advised former Vice President Mike Pence during his time in office, will testify June 16 before the House Jan. 6 committee.​

Luttig played a key role in supporting Pence as the former vice president refused requests from Trump, under the advice of conservative Claremont Institute lawyer John Eastman, to reject the results of the 2020 elections.​
According to a memo obtained by journalists Bob Woodward and Robert Costa, Eastman reportedly told Trumpthat Pence could simply refuse to certify the electors sent by the states, thus throwing the selection of electoral votes to House of Representative state delegations that were dominated by Republicans who supported Trump.​
“The fact is that the Constitution assigns this power to the Vice President as the ultimate arbiter. We should take all of our actions with that in mind,” Eastman wrote in the memo
According to CNN, Pence’s personal lawyer, Richard Cullen, contacted Luttig asking him to provide a legal argument to rebut Eastman, who had once been Luttig’s clerk. Luttig published a tweet thread the day before the Jan. 6 insurrection on whether Pence as vice president had the ability to change the way Electoral College votes were counted. Luttig concluded that Pence did not.​
The only responsibility and power of the Vice President under the Constitution is to faithfully count the electoral college votes as they have been cast,” Luttig wrote.

Luttig said in an interview with Frontline in the days before the Jan. 6 committee hearings began that it was clear “the plan was to overturn the election through the exploitation of what I’ve called the institutions of democracy and the instruments and instrumentalities of our democracy.”

“We know now there’s no question about it,” Luttig said. “They knew exactly what they were doing. And they believed it.”​
 
So I guess you are saying that I am in the same company with Judge Michael Luttig

An ultra conservative Judge ranking as high as Alito and Scalia as far as his conservative bonafides go snd he considers Trump
a clear and present danger to democracy.”

J. Michael Luttig, a former federal judge and conservative legal expert who advised former Vice President Mike Pence during his time in office, will testify June 16 before the House Jan. 6 committee.​

Luttig played a key role in supporting Pence as the former vice president refused requests from Trump, under the advice of conservative Claremont Institute lawyer John Eastman, to reject the results of the 2020 elections.​
According to a memo obtained by journalists Bob Woodward and Robert Costa, Eastman reportedly told Trumpthat Pence could simply refuse to certify the electors sent by the states, thus throwing the selection of electoral votes to House of Representative state delegations that were dominated by Republicans who supported Trump.​
“The fact is that the Constitution assigns this power to the Vice President as the ultimate arbiter. We should take all of our actions with that in mind,” Eastman wrote in the memo
According to CNN, Pence’s personal lawyer, Richard Cullen, contacted Luttig asking him to provide a legal argument to rebut Eastman, who had once been Luttig’s clerk. Luttig published a tweet thread the day before the Jan. 6 insurrection on whether Pence as vice president had the ability to change the way Electoral College votes were counted. Luttig concluded that Pence did not.​
The only responsibility and power of the Vice President under the Constitution is to faithfully count the electoral college votes as they have been cast,” Luttig wrote.

Luttig said in an interview with Frontline in the days before the Jan. 6 committee hearings began that it was clear “the plan was to overturn the election through the exploitation of what I’ve called the institutions of democracy and the instruments and instrumentalities of our democracy.”

“We know now there’s no question about it,” Luttig said. “They knew exactly what they were doing. And they believed it.”​
We all believe the election was stolen . You liars will never admit to it , but you know.
 

Forum List

Back
Top