- Feb 22, 2017
- 113,731
- 40,356
- 2,290
Where? Why won't you answer?
Why should I? Last time I gave you exact numbers and did the math for you and you told me you did not care about the facts, you were told something and that was good enough for you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where? Why won't you answer?
I never said I did not care about facts. Please produce that post. Thanks.Why should I? Last time I gave you exact numbers and did the math for you and you told me you did not care about the facts, you were told something and that was good enough for you.
By a judge of the New York supreme court, and then upheld by the New York court of appeals.
All political. Judges are elected.
Then they are appointed by politicians. That is even worse.Not in New York. They are confirmed by the state senate, which in the case of the majority of the sitting judges were confirmed by a republican senate.
So much for claiming they were political. If anything, they were republicans.
Then they are appointed by politicians. That is even worse.
They were confirmed by a republican New York senate.Then they are appointed by politicians. That is even worse.
Merit would be nice.So it is bad if they are elected, worse if they are appointed.
Exactly how the fuck do you think Judges should get their positions?
Merit would be nice.
He didn't have a clue how judges are appointed in New York. So he assumed they were elected (WRONG) and when told they were nominated by the Governor and confirmed by the senate (republican controlled in New York at the time) he was against that too.So it is bad if they are elected, worse if they are appointed.
Exactly how the fuck do you think Judges should get their positions?
He didn't have a clue how judges are appointed in New York. So he assumed they were elected (WRONG) and when told they were nominated by the Governor and confirmed by the senate (republican controlled in New York at the time) he was against that too.
And who do you want to judge that merit?Merit would be nice.
You are deflecting from the fact voters have to sue to see the votes in GA. Why is that if there was no fraud?And who do you want to judge that merit?
Politicians, who are elected, or by other judges who are not.
"Georgia counties still have all the paper ballots cast in the election, according to the Secretary of State’s office. The results of the presidential race in Georgia were counted three times, and all three tallies showed Democrat Joe Biden prevailing"
Posts misrepresent impact of missing ballot images in Georgia
Social media users are reigniting unsupported claims of 2020 election meddling in Georgia after a longtime critic of Georgia’s election systems pointed out that some of the state’s counties could not produce electronic ballot images from that election.apnews.com
You are running away from acknowledging that Rudy Giuliani's accusers (that he lied) were republican confirmed judges on the New York court of appeals.You are deflecting from the fact voters have to sue to see the votes in GA. Why is that if there was no fraud?
I am running back to the topic of this thread. Why is it so hard to get the ballots if there was no fraud?You are running away from acknowledging that Rudy Giuliani's accusers (that he lied) were republican confirmed judges on the New York court of appeals.
These are the highest judges in the state, and to answer your question of "sez who" that Rudy Giuliani was lying about the election, it's as I said, the highest judges in New York.
Because as with most election laws, the ballots re under the control of the county election boards, who are legally bound to keep them secure, That's why someone needs a court order to get access to them.You are deflecting from the fact voters have to sue to see the votes in GA. Why is that if there was no fraud?
Well, then what is the problem? Voters want to see them.Because as with most election laws, the ballots re under the control of the county election boards, who are legally bound to keep them secure, That's why someone needs a court order to get access to them.
It's election law.
I am running back to the topic of this thread. Why is it so hard to get the ballots if there was no fraud?
Then they need to get a judge to O.K. it.Well, then what is the problem? Voters want to see them.
Why wouldn't he? What are the people telling him not to worried about? Do you assholes want to help prove there was no fraud? Those ballots would do that, if there was no fraud.Then they need to get a judge to O.K. it.