$725 million more to Ukraine while we are distracted with Hunter

1srelluc

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2021
Messages
59,771
Reaction score
88,519
Points
3,488
Location
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia



IMG_2901-3396180.jpg


Mines.......lol.

They will be wanting 500M+ after the peace talks to remove them.

There's a reason the pardon is backdated to 2014; a NATO vassal state was created in Ukraine with the CIA coup.

Hunter ran point on the rob and plunder op, and they're going to squeeze every last drop of blood out of it before the clock runs out on 20 January.
 
Last edited:
There's no appreciable amount of opposition to sending more money to the Ukraine. Trump is having to carry the antiwar ball by himself and he's being silent on account of fear that stopping the money will be too unpopular.

The sore loser Dems and Biden are going to haunt the Trump admin long after Jan.20th.
 
Not a peep from the GOP led house?....
It's like as if Biden owns them!

Why would Trump ever think he could turn the Republican House? Their one priority that's much greater than Trump's wishes, is in ensuring that America doesn't quit and goes on to win the war.

It's either that or Russia and China and the Brics win all the marbles!

Now it begins.
 
It's like as if Biden owns them!

Why would Trump ever think he could turn the Republican House? Their one priority that's much greater than Trump's wishes, is in ensuring that America doesn't quit and goes on to win the war.

It's either that or Russia and China and the Brics win all the marbles!

Now it begins.
Win the war?... what does that look like to you?... a dead Putin?... a defeated Russian military?...
and how much more devastation and death lay in the way of "winning the war"?...
Its easy for people to talk... but if we don't refortify our military and grow our Navy and Air power we won't be able to win anything...
 
Relevant reading...

Copyright © 2024 The Ron Paul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.

Biden’s Parting Shot at America​

by Ron Paul | Dec 2, 2024

rp-weekly-button-1-1.jpg


The interim between a US presidential election and the swearing in of a new Administration has for most of our history been a non-eventful period where the outgoing Administration winds down operations and the incoming Administration ramps up new personnel before the inauguration.

The 20th Amendment to our Constitution was enacted in 1933 to reduce the “lame duck” period between election and inauguration to January 20th instead of March 4th. Increasing ease in travel and communications made such a long interim unnecessary. However long the transition period, it has been understood that with the new election came a new mandate from the American people and the “lame duck” outgoing administration was meant to quietly quack out its last few days in office without incident.

Then came Biden. In the period since the American people rejected Biden’s neocon interventionists in favor of Donald Trump’s promises to end the wars, the “lame duck” has run roughshod over the will of the American people. Whoever is running Biden – and the answer is unclear – has decided to “Trump proof” foreign policy to bring us to the literal brink of WWIII with Russia. And to top it off, Biden’s people this past week have again unleashed al-Qaeda linked rebels to wreak havoc in Syria!

After solidly opposing the neocon demand that Ukraine be given permission to fire US weapons deep into Russia, President Biden in the waning days of his presidency suddenly reversed course and granted permission. From back in 2022, when Russia first went into Ukraine, Biden had argued against sending offensive weaponry and US troops to fight on Ukraine’s behalf. “Make no mistake,” he said in March of that year, “that’s called World War III.”

Something about losing the popular and electoral vote has led Biden’s people to disregard the threat of WWIII and give the green light for attacks with US missiles deep into Russian territory. Why is this so different than providing tanks or bullets? These missile systems are highly complex and classified and can only be operated by US or NATO personnel. That means that American military officers are shooting American missiles into Russia – something unimaginable even in the depths of the Cold War!

Then, just days ago, we saw the sudden re-emergence of the US former proxies in Syria – extremists whose ties go back to al-Qaeda – sweep halfway through the country in what appears to be a return of Obama’s disastrous “Assad must go” policy. For five years the conflict in Syria had been more or less “frozen,” but Biden’s people have turned it up to a boil.

Why has the Biden Administration suddenly given a green light to these terrorists and how deeply is the CIA involved in stirring up new trouble in Syria? Make no mistake: these US-backed “rebels” would never have made their move without the approval of the Biden Administration.

The American people did not vote for an expansion of war, either in eastern Europe or the Middle East. A recent CBS News/YouGov poll has shown that a majority of Americans favor an end to all US military aid to Ukraine.

Upending the card table just because you lose the game not only shows blatant disregard for the “democracy” his party constantly preached on the campaign trail, but by pouring gasoline on these two very dangerous conflicts as he heads for the door President Biden puts each and every one of us in grave danger.

Author: Ron Paul (View all posts)​

 

$725 million more to Ukraine


HO HO HO
One Himars system costs nearly $500 million .
So the Ukeys might get one and a half systems which will last ten minutes before the Russians obliterate that threat .

Far better . Get them some warm gloves and underwear
 
And Chinese Landowners bringing in containers of Attack Drones to kill American Troops and destroy Military Equipment and Civilian Infrastructure
 
It's like as if Biden owns them!

Why would Trump ever think he could turn the Republican House? Their one priority that's much greater than Trump's wishes, is in ensuring that America doesn't quit and goes on to win the war.

It's either that or Russia and China and the Brics win all the marbles!

Now it begins.
Explain win!
 
Explain win!
Sure! Winning is the opposite of losing. You've heard it said that America is not going to be the uni-polar superpower of the world in the 21st. century. That doesn't have to be true if America can own the riches of the country that now owns the greatest amount of the world's wealth.
 
Sure! Winning is the opposite of losing. You've heard it said that America is not going to be the uni-polar superpower of the world in the 21st. century. That doesn't have to be true if America can own the riches of the country that now owns the greatest amount of the world's wealth.
So how do we do such thing when it isn't our war, and what sacrifices are you ready to make to win?
 
And Chinese Landowners bringing in containers of Attack Drones to kill American Troops and destroy Military Equipment and Civilian Infrastructure
We need to condemn (take) all land owned by Chinese or others around or close to US bases to be sure that a pre-emptive strike cannot affect a US military response.
 

$725 million more to Ukraine


HO HO HO
One Himars system costs nearly $500 million .
So the Ukeys might get one and a half systems which will last ten minutes before the Russians obliterate that threat .

Far better . Get them some warm gloves and underwear

Interesting that a couple of old chaps did not even believe US provided cost figures for the HIMARS system .
A wonderful mechanism --- Cognitive Rigidity -- for when you cannot handle facts .

Will there be any home grown UAF remaining ?
Over 200 000 have surrendered -- the running total , and they all ran in the same direction .
Home to Mummy .
 
It's like as if Biden owns them!

Why would Trump ever think he could turn the Republican House? Their one priority that's much greater than Trump's wishes, is in ensuring that America doesn't quit and goes on to win the war.

It's either that or Russia and China and the Brics win all the marbles!

Now it begins.

The US can not possibly win the war in the Ukraine.
Not only is Russia closer and larger, but will have to resort to nuking the US if they have to, in order to win.
That is because the Ukraine is INSIDE the Russian defense grid, since Russia used to have retaliatory nukes there.
So if the Ukraine were to be allowed to join NATO, then the US would install first strike nukes there that Russia could not detect until they detonated in Russia.
So anyone thinking the US can win in the Ukraine, is not rational.
Never going to happen.

And from an ethical standpoint, the Ukraine is historically the most important part of Russia, with the capital of Russia only moving out of Kyiv due to fear during the Mongol invasion around 1200 AD.
Kyiv has a lot of ethnic Polish from the defeated Polish invasion attempt around 1700, but they are not really native. The Ukraine was part of Russia until the Treaty of Versailles illegally took it to punish the Bolshevik revolution in 1920.
 
The US can not possibly win the war in the Ukraine.
Not only is Russia closer and larger, but will have to resort to nuking the US if they have to, in order to win.
That is because the Ukraine is INSIDE the Russian defense grid, since Russia used to have retaliatory nukes there.
So if the Ukraine were to be allowed to join NATO, then the US would install first strike nukes there that Russia could not detect until they detonated in Russia.
So anyone thinking the US can win in the Ukraine, is not rational.
Never going to happen.
Yes of course, but! There's so much more to discuss before we have to start thinking of nuclear war. There are the strictest precautions and limitations on the war to protect against nuclear, in which nobody wins.
And from an ethical standpoint, the Ukraine is historically the most important part of Russia, with the capital of Russia only moving out of Kyiv due to fear during the Mongol invasion around 1200 AD.
We can't take from that that Russia is intent on taking the Ukraine back. Russia is ready to negotiate a settlement based on only keeping that which they have fought for and won.
Kyiv has a lot of ethnic Polish from the defeated Polish invasion attempt around 1700, but they are not really native. The Ukraine was part of Russia until the Treaty of Versailles illegally took it to punish the Bolshevik revolution in 1920.
You know your history. How about applying what else you know to a discussion on how a war with conventional weapons will evolve?

I'll feed you something for a start: America/Nato attack Russia with ballistic missiles and do appreciable damage, along with a thousand or two Russian fatalities. Russia then destroys or sinks a US aircraft carrier, costing America two thousand lives. What comes next in a conventional weapons war?

If that scenario doesn't work for you, start your own. Or maybe even fill in the steps leading up to my imagined scenario?

This could become a source for ideas!
 
Back
Top Bottom