7 reasons why liberals are incapable of understanding the world

[Flash]

[

You still can't comprehend the difference between taxes and charity can you?



5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.

.

Liberals really don't believe in charity. They are generally not very generous people when it comes to their own personal lives. What they call charity is getting the filthy ass oppressive government to take money away from somebody else to be used to pay their bills. Liberals are greedy assholes for the most part with no concept of personal responsibility or Liberty.

 

[Wyatt earp]

[

You still can't comprehend the difference between taxes and charity can you?



5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.

.

Liberals really don't believe in charity. They are generally not very generous people when it comes to their own personal lives. What they call charity is getting the filthy ass oppressive government to take money away from somebody else to be used to pay their bills. Liberals are greedy assholes for the most part with no concept of personal responsibility or Liberty.

Well we on the right know they think they are by taking your money by force and giving it to someone else = charity

In liberal logic 101


.

 

[JonKoch]

[QUO



Yup Obama was the epitome of number 6 in my OP


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personalfailing or a failure of the state?


.

There are many flaws with Liberalism but the inability to take personal responsibility is probably the greatest flaw in Liberalism. Those dumbasses think that the State should be responsibility for their well being, not themselves. They are willing to give up Liberty and prosperity for the false security of a welfare state because of their inability to take personal responsibility for their own well being. Despicable, isn't it?

Liberals not only take responsibility for themselves, but the rest of society

Conservatives only look out for themselves

You mean liberals force everyone to fund their schemes to save humanity, and they never work.

The world would be a lot better off if everyone stuck to looking out for themselves.

Care to point to this mythical libertarian place that follows your BS premise?

Closest we have are most Latin America/Asian nations

Latin American nations are anything but libertarian. Hong Kong and Singapore are probably the closest we have.

250 years ago democracy was "mythical." According to your logic, it should never have happened.

HK? Oh right where 40% of housing s subsidized and BOTH are just ways financialization of the economy

Singapore has a MANDATORY 20% health savings account, how libertarian

1,000,000 people? LMAOROG

 

[JonKoch]

[QU

Care to point to ONE policy since the US Founding that CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?


How about one policy the past 50 years the GOP passed that worked as promised?

I am not a Republican so you are barking up the wrong tree there Sport. I gave up on the Republican Party being a party of real Conservatives a long time go. The Republicans are Democrat Light for the most part. They talk a good game but usually give us the same big fiscally irresponsible big welfare state government as the filthy ass Democrats. The distinction sounds great in a debate but once the Republicans get into office you can't tell them from the Democrats.

The policies of personal Liberty, personal responsibility, fiscal responsibility, appreciation of life, low taxation, limited government interference in our lives and rejection of the filthy ass welfare state are the core beliefs of Conservatives.

On the other hand the filthy ass greedy Libtards believe in state corresponded thievery. They are pretty much the scum of America. The Democrat Party is a coalition of a the despicable assholes in the country. The Negroes that vote their race and their welfare check, environmental wackos, anti gun nuts, welfare queens, illegals, Feminazis, confused college kids and their batshit crazy Marxists professors, socialist, queers, union thugs and abortionists.

Good thing I asked TWO separate questions, one about CONServatives and one about GOPers


Instead of right wing jingles you klowns ALWAYS have, please point to a POLICY or law not some myths and fairy tales you klowns always use!!!

Reagan / Obama phone

Woo-Hoo, though CONservatives fought both as well as the grandaddy of it, FDR's electrification of America!!!

 

[Faun]

Right wingers are delusional. They truly believe ignorance give them insight. That everything can be looked at in a way that's simple. Because they are simpletons.

Too bad they don't spend more time building and creating. Their obvious envy is pathetic. They can only build their self esteem by tearing others down. If you have nothing to show your only option is as a credit snatcher. For instance, like trying to take credit for taking down Bin Laden. Or after Republicans ruined the economy under Bush, the Democrats brought us back to prosperity. And so Republicans whine, "You didn't bring us far enough so you failed". Worse, their only policies are the very ones that ruined the economy under Bush. They have learned nothing of value. And still, they toot a rusty and old out of tune horn. Sad. It's not even a horn. It's a kazoo.

Aw, a baby libtard pooped his diapers. How cute. All you have is hate, lies and smears. Republicans ruined the economy no matter how much the Democrat congress spent and Obama doubling Bush's debt? Another hallmark of liberalism is sheer stupidity. Your little pea brains are easy to manipulate.

"Republicans ruined the economy no matter how much the Democrat congress spent and Obama doubling Bush's debt?"


Know what happens when you inherit 20% of GDP in revenues and spending then dump revenues to 14.6% AS you blow up spending to almost 24% of GDP like Dubya/GOP did?

Care to give the law or policies Obama passed or had that did that?

Obama care, 4,000 regulations and rules by the EPA

.

Weird you can't critically think (HINT ACA 100% FUNDED, UNLIKE ANYTHING THE GOP EVER PASSES) :


They Called Obamacare A 'Job-Killer.'

Top Ex-White House Economist Admits 94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time | Zero Hedge

How can anybody be as fucked in the head as you appear to be??

Your own article claims that 94% of the jobs added being part time jobs were between the years 2005 and 2015.

Quoted by quartz, he said “We find that 94% of net job growth in the past decade was in the alternative work category,” said Krueger. “And over 60% was due to the [the rise] of independent contractors, freelancers and contract company workers.” In other words, nearly all of the 10 million jobs created between 2005 and 2015 were not traditional nine-to-five employment.​

Now you're asserting that Obama was president between 2005 through 2008??

And let's take a look at the ratio of full time/part time jobs under Obama up until the time that article came out....


Part time:
01.2009: 26,377,000
12.2015: 27,370,000
Net Gain: 993,000


Full time:
01.2009: 115,818,000
12.2015: 122,700,000
Net Gain: 6,882,000

Percentage of part time jobs added during that period under Obama (weeding out the horrendous numbers from Bush's years that were included in that 94%)...

12.6%

And that's only until the end of 2015. If we look at all of Obama's presidency, we find...


Part time:
01.2009: 26,377,000
12.2015: 27,233,000
Net Gain: 856,000


Full time:
01.2009: 115,818,000
12.2015: 125,987,000
Net Gain: 11,025,000

Percentage of part time jobs:

7.8%

So once again, we see you post bullshit because you look for bullshit and lack the intellectual fortitude to fact check what you post, no less, even understand what you post.

 

[JonKoch]

[

You still can't comprehend the difference between taxes and charity can you?



5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.

.

Liberals really don't believe in charity. They are generally not very generous people when it comes to their own personal lives. What they call charity is getting the filthy ass oppressive government to take money away from somebody else to be used to pay their bills. Liberals are greedy assholes for the most part with no concept of personal responsibility or Liberty.

More right wing BS fed to you by the right wing infotainment complex. I'm shocked

Study: Conservatives and liberals are equally charitable, but they give to different charities
Study: Conservatives and liberals are equally charitable, but they give to different charities

BROOKS IS A NUTJOB LIAR

 

[Wyatt earp]

[QU

Care to point to ONE policy since the US Founding that CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?


How about one policy the past 50 years the GOP passed that worked as promised?

I am not a Republican so you are barking up the wrong tree there Sport. I gave up on the Republican Party being a party of real Conservatives a long time go. The Republicans are Democrat Light for the most part. They talk a good game but usually give us the same big fiscally irresponsible big welfare state government as the filthy ass Democrats. The distinction sounds great in a debate but once the Republicans get into office you can't tell them from the Democrats.

The policies of personal Liberty, personal responsibility, fiscal responsibility, appreciation of life, low taxation, limited government interference in our lives and rejection of the filthy ass welfare state are the core beliefs of Conservatives.

On the other hand the filthy ass greedy Libtards believe in state corresponded thievery. They are pretty much the scum of America. The Democrat Party is a coalition of a the despicable assholes in the country. The Negroes that vote their race and their welfare check, environmental wackos, anti gun nuts, welfare queens, illegals, Feminazis, confused college kids and their batshit crazy Marxists professors, socialist, queers, union thugs and abortionists.

Good thing I asked TWO separate questions, one about CONServatives and one about GOPers


Instead of right wing jingles you klowns ALWAYS have, please point to a POLICY or law not some myths and fairy tales you klowns always use!!!

Reagan / Obama phone

Woo-Hoo, though CONservatives fought both as well as the grandaddy of it, FDR's electrification of America!!!

Funy how the first electrified city in America is in the conservative South

.

.

 

[Faun]

Liberals do 'tax and spend' , but at least they balance the budget. Republicans did 'borrow and spend' and like Reagan and Bush, tripled and doubled the national debt. For people like you, it means they left debts three times, and two times the size they inherited.

Really? How did that go during the Obama administration?

Yep, Dubya inheriting 20% of GDP in revenues and spending while Obama inherited 14.6% of GDP in revenues and almost 24% in spending is Obama's fault *shaking head*

POLICIES THAT OBAMA PUT IN PLACE THAT CAUSED THE DEBT? HINT OBAMA LOWERED DUBYA'S FINAL F/Y DEFICIT BY 2/3RDS!

So you're blaming it on Bush. Didn't one of your ilk just get done whining that Republicans blame Obama for everything wrong?

Why not blame Bush?? He took credit for the housing boom before it went bust.

"Thanks to our policies, homeownership in America is at an all time high!" ~ George Bush, 2004 RNC acceptance speech​

Once again my op



6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility.


.

Where's your personal responsibility for being the moron who actually asserted Obama funneled money to influence an election he didn't know about?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Aw, a baby libtard pooped his diapers. How cute. All you have is hate, lies and smears. Republicans ruined the economy no matter how much the Democrat congress spent and Obama doubling Bush's debt? Another hallmark of liberalism is sheer stupidity. Your little pea brains are easy to manipulate.

"Republicans ruined the economy no matter how much the Democrat congress spent and Obama doubling Bush's debt?"


Know what happens when you inherit 20% of GDP in revenues and spending then dump revenues to 14.6% AS you blow up spending to almost 24% of GDP like Dubya/GOP did?

Care to give the law or policies Obama passed or had that did that?

Obama care, 4,000 regulations and rules by the EPA

.

Weird you can't critically think (HINT ACA 100% FUNDED, UNLIKE ANYTHING THE GOP EVER PASSES) :


They Called Obamacare A 'Job-Killer.'

Top Ex-White House Economist Admits 94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time | Zero Hedge

How can anybody be as fucked in the head as you appear to be??

Your own article claims that 94% of the jobs added being part time jobs were between the years 2005 and 2015.

Quoted by quartz, he said “We find that 94% of net job growth in the past decade was in the alternative work category,” said Krueger. “And over 60% was due to the [the rise] of independent contractors, freelancers and contract company workers.” In other words, nearly all of the 10 million jobs created between 2005 and 2015 were not traditional nine-to-five employment.​

Now you're asserting that Obama was president between 2005 through 2008??

And let's take a look at the ratio of full time/part time jobs under Obama up until the time that article came out....


Part time:
01.2009: 26,377,000
12.2015: 27,370,000
Net Gain: 993,000


Full time:
01.2009: 115,818,000
12.2015: 122,700,000
Net Gain: 6,882,000

Percentage of part time jobs added during that period under Obama (weeding out the horrendous numbers from Bush's years that were included in that 94%)...

12.6%

And that's only until the end of 2015. If we look at all of Obama's presidency, we find...


Part time:
01.2009: 26,377,000
12.2015: 27,233,000
Net Gain: 856,000


Full time:
01.2009: 115,818,000
12.2015: 125,987,000
Net Gain: 11,025,000

Percentage of part time jobs:

7.8%

So once again, we see you post bullshit because you look for bullshit and lack the intellectual fortitude to fact check what you post, no less, even understand what you post.

Ohhh Fawn was waiting and creaming in his jeans to bring out stats wernt you boi?



.

 

[JonKoch]

For instance, on the issue of economics the stupid Liberals think the solution is higher taxation, more deficit spending and taking money away from the people that earned it and giving it away to the special interest groups that didn't earn the money. How convoluted is that?

Liberals do 'tax and spend' , but at least they balance the budget. Republicans did 'borrow and spend' and like Reagan and Bush, tripled and doubled the national debt. For people like you, it means they left debts three times, and two times the size they inherited.

Really? How did that go during the Obama administration?

Yep, Dubya inheriting 20% of GDP in revenues and spending while Obama inherited 14.6% of GDP in revenues and almost 24% in spending is Obama's fault *shaking head*

POLICIES THAT OBAMA PUT IN PLACE THAT CAUSED THE DEBT? HINT OBAMA LOWERED DUBYA'S FINAL F/Y DEFICIT BY 2/3RDS!

So you're blaming it on Bush. Didn't one of your ilk just get done whining that Republicans blame Obama for everything wrong?

Pointing out POLICY MATTERS?

Hint BJ Bill had 20% of GDP in revenues and spending, he had 4 surpluses, 3 after vetoing the GOP's $792+ billion tax cut, THEN DUBYA/GOP HAD TOTAL CONTROL OF THE ECONOMY FOR 6 YEARS AND GUTTED REVENUES TO 14.6% OF GDP (KOREAN WAR LEVELS) AS THEY BLEW UP SPENDING TOO NEARLY 24% OF GDP WHILE DUBYA CHEERED ON THE BANKSTERS SUBPRIME BUBBLE!!



CARE TO POINT TO A LAW PASSED OR POLICY OBAMA PUT IN PLACE THAT CREATED THE DEBT????? LOL

 

[Wyatt earp]

Really? How did that go during the Obama administration?

Yep, Dubya inheriting 20% of GDP in revenues and spending while Obama inherited 14.6% of GDP in revenues and almost 24% in spending is Obama's fault *shaking head*

POLICIES THAT OBAMA PUT IN PLACE THAT CAUSED THE DEBT? HINT OBAMA LOWERED DUBYA'S FINAL F/Y DEFICIT BY 2/3RDS!

So you're blaming it on Bush. Didn't one of your ilk just get done whining that Republicans blame Obama for everything wrong?

Why not blame Bush?? He took credit for the housing boom before it went bust.

"Thanks to our policies, homeownership in America is at an all time high!" ~ George Bush, 2004 RNC acceptance speech​

Once again my op



6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility.


.

Where's your personal responsibility for being the moron who actually asserted Obama funneled money to influence an election he didn't know about?

Again I have the left media

The right media

The Senate bi partisian report and a black guy on my side..


What do you have ?





.

 

[Faun]

"Republicans ruined the economy no matter how much the Democrat congress spent and Obama doubling Bush's debt?"


Know what happens when you inherit 20% of GDP in revenues and spending then dump revenues to 14.6% AS you blow up spending to almost 24% of GDP like Dubya/GOP did?

Care to give the law or policies Obama passed or had that did that?

Obama care, 4,000 regulations and rules by the EPA

.

Weird you can't critically think (HINT ACA 100% FUNDED, UNLIKE ANYTHING THE GOP EVER PASSES) :


They Called Obamacare A 'Job-Killer.'

Top Ex-White House Economist Admits 94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time | Zero Hedge

How can anybody be as fucked in the head as you appear to be??

Your own article claims that 94% of the jobs added being part time jobs were between the years 2005 and 2015.

Quoted by quartz, he said “We find that 94% of net job growth in the past decade was in the alternative work category,” said Krueger. “And over 60% was due to the [the rise] of independent contractors, freelancers and contract company workers.” In other words, nearly all of the 10 million jobs created between 2005 and 2015 were not traditional nine-to-five employment.​

Now you're asserting that Obama was president between 2005 through 2008??

And let's take a look at the ratio of full time/part time jobs under Obama up until the time that article came out....


Part time:
01.2009: 26,377,000
12.2015: 27,370,000
Net Gain: 993,000


Full time:
01.2009: 115,818,000
12.2015: 122,700,000
Net Gain: 6,882,000

Percentage of part time jobs added during that period under Obama (weeding out the horrendous numbers from Bush's years that were included in that 94%)...

12.6%

And that's only until the end of 2015. If we look at all of Obama's presidency, we find...


Part time:
01.2009: 26,377,000
12.2015: 27,233,000
Net Gain: 856,000


Full time:
01.2009: 115,818,000
12.2015: 125,987,000
Net Gain: 11,025,000

Percentage of part time jobs:

7.8%

So once again, we see you post bullshit because you look for bullshit and lack the intellectual fortitude to fact check what you post, no less, even understand what you post.

Ohhh Fawn was waiting and creaming in his jeans to bring out stats wernt you boi?



.

I understand, stats scare you.

Of course they do, they both expose your idiocy AND you can't refute them (which is why everyone reading this saw you didn't even try).

But again, I'm saying this to the form moron who really did just post how Obama was president since 2005.

 

[bripat9643]

Liberals get it wrong on just about every issue. It doesn't make any difference what the issue is the Liberals will have a convoluted idea of the solution. That is why they get so much ridicule and have no credibility.

For instance, on the issue of economics the stupid Liberals think the solution is higher taxation, more deficit spending and taking money away from the people that earned it and giving it away to the special interest groups that didn't earn the money. How convoluted is that?

Care to point to ONE policy since the US Founding that CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?


How about one policy the past 50 years the GOP passed that worked as promised?

They were correct about staying out of WW I and WW II. They have always been correct about opposing socialist government boondoggles like Social Security, welfare and Medicare. They were correct about the folly of going off the gold standard, opposing the income tax and opposing the 17th Amendment.

So NOTHING were they on the correct side of US history, though I'm happy to see someone is being honest about them being isolationist during BOTH WW's

SS the best anti poverty program in the US? Keeps almost half of seniors out of poverty?? lol

Medicare? Oh right that thing that gets above 80% approval rating and costs 3% to administer...

Your claims are all leftwing propaganda and bullshit. everyone would be far wealthier when they retire if they had the 15% of their income the government takes to invest. Our GDP would have increased at a far greater rate if government hadn't pissed that money down the sewer.,

The idea that getting involved in WW I was a good idea was rejected by the entire country after the war. Any fool could see that taking sides in that mess was a foolish.

I could go on all day, but that's enough to show what a moron you are.

How'd they do before SS again? How about Chile's example where they are STILL subsidizing BECAUSE costs ate up supposed returns YET still most who went private (except the most well off), are dirt poor in poverty?



Your BS premise is destroyed Bubs

That's total ******* bullshit.

They did fine before SSN, although not during the Great Depression. Obviously, virtually no one did fine then. Most people had a good sized nest egg saved up when government wasn't fleecing them for everything they earned.

 

[JonKoch]

Right wingers are delusional. They truly believe ignorance give them insight. That everything can be looked at in a way that's simple. Because they are simpletons.

Too bad they don't spend more time building and creating. Their obvious envy is pathetic. They can only build their self esteem by tearing others down. If you have nothing to show your only option is as a credit snatcher. For instance, like trying to take credit for taking down Bin Laden. Or after Republicans ruined the economy under Bush, the Democrats brought us back to prosperity. And so Republicans whine, "You didn't bring us far enough so you failed". Worse, their only policies are the very ones that ruined the economy under Bush. They have learned nothing of value. And still, they toot a rusty and old out of tune horn. Sad. It's not even a horn. It's a kazoo.

Aw, a baby libtard pooped his diapers. How cute. All you have is hate, lies and smears. Republicans ruined the economy no matter how much the Democrat congress spent and Obama doubling Bush's debt? Another hallmark of liberalism is sheer stupidity. Your little pea brains are easy to manipulate.

"Republicans ruined the economy no matter how much the Democrat congress spent and Obama doubling Bush's debt?"


Know what happens when you inherit 20% of GDP in revenues and spending then dump revenues to 14.6% AS you blow up spending to almost 24% of GDP like Dubya/GOP did?

Care to give the law or policies Obama passed or had that did that?

Obama care, 4,000 regulations and rules by the EPA

.

Weird you can't critically think (HINT ACA 100% FUNDED, UNLIKE ANYTHING THE GOP EVER PASSES) :


They Called Obamacare A 'Job-Killer.'

You forgot to mention that the red dive started when that filthy ass Democrat elected Congress took over in 2007. In the six years before that Bush had a decent economy and then the Democrats took over Congress with Barney Queerboy, Tits Peloski, Dirty Harry and that asshole senator from Illinois and everything went to hell.

If you want to post silly shit like that just remember that during that blue part of the line Obama increased poverty, decreased family income, increased income disparity, let millions of illegals flood in, appointed two extreme far Left assholes to the Supreme Court. tremendously grew debt ,and had dismal economic growth not ever even achieving a paltry 3%. That is on top of destroying healthcare and conducting a disastrous foreign policy.

You stupid Moon Bats need to get down on your knees and beg us Americans to forgive you for electing the worst President this country ever had.

Just remember something else Moon Bat, since you like to put up stupid charts like that. During his first 100 days Trump created 370,000 jobs. During Obama's first 100 days he lost 1,500,000 jobs.

By the way dumbshit, the ACA passed strictly along partisan lines. Only the filthy ass Democrats voted for it and as we all know it was disaster. Like I said, you Liberals should beg America for forgiveness. You were really idiots electing Obama and his administration was a disaster. Thank god Crooked Hillary wasn't elected to continue with the disaster.

SHOULD BE SIMPLE TO POINT TO WHAT THE DEMS PASSED IN CONGRESS WHEN THEY TOOK OVER THEN RIGHT BUBBA?

Right wingers are delusional. They truly believe ignorance give them insight. That everything can be looked at in a way that's simple. Because they are simpletons.

Too bad they don't spend more time building and creating. Their obvious envy is pathetic. They can only build their self esteem by tearing others down. If you have nothing to show your only option is as a credit snatcher. For instance, like trying to take credit for taking down Bin Laden. Or after Republicans ruined the economy under Bush, the Democrats brought us back to prosperity. And so Republicans whine, "You didn't bring us far enough so you failed". Worse, their only policies are the very ones that ruined the economy under Bush. They have learned nothing of value. And still, they toot a rusty and old out of tune horn. Sad. It's not even a horn. It's a kazoo.

Aw, a baby libtard pooped his diapers. How cute. All you have is hate, lies and smears. Republicans ruined the economy no matter how much the Democrat congress spent and Obama doubling Bush's debt? Another hallmark of liberalism is sheer stupidity. Your little pea brains are easy to manipulate.

"Republicans ruined the economy no matter how much the Democrat congress spent and Obama doubling Bush's debt?"


Know what happens when you inherit 20% of GDP in revenues and spending then dump revenues to 14.6% AS you blow up spending to almost 24% of GDP like Dubya/GOP did?

Care to give the law or policies Obama passed or had that did that?

Obama care, 4,000 regulations and rules by the EPA

.

Weird you can't critically think (HINT ACA 100% FUNDED, UNLIKE ANYTHING THE GOP EVER PASSES) :


They Called Obamacare A 'Job-Killer.'

You forgot to mention that the red dive started when that filthy ass Democrat elected Congress took over in 2007. In the six years before that Bush had a decent economy and then the Democrats took over Congress with Barney Queerboy, Tits Peloski, Dirty Harry and that asshole senator from Illinois and everything went to hell.

If you want to post silly shit like that just remember that during that blue part of the line Obama increased poverty, decreased family income, increased income disparity, let millions of illegals flood in, appointed two extreme far Left assholes to the Supreme Court. tremendously grew debt ,and had dismal economic growth not ever even achieving a paltry 3%. That is on top of destroying healthcare and conducting a disastrous foreign policy.

You stupid Moon Bats need to get down on your knees and beg us Americans to forgive you for electing the worst President this country ever had.

Just remember something else Moon Bat, since you like to put up stupid charts like that. During his first 100 days Trump created 370,000 jobs. During Obama's first 100 days he lost 1,500,000 jobs.

By the way dumbshit, the ACA passed strictly along partisan lines. Only the filthy ass Democrats voted for it and as we all know it was disaster. Like I said, you Liberals should beg America for forgiveness. You were really idiots electing Obama and his administration was a disaster. Thank god Crooked Hillary wasn't elected to continue with the disaster.

SHOULD BE EASY TO POINT THE LAWS THE DEMS PASSED THAT CHANGED DUBYA/GOP POLICY IN 2007 THEN RIGHT BUBBA? LMAOROG

From Bush's President's Working Group on Financial Markets March 2008

"The Presidents Working Group's March policy statement acknowledged that turmoil in financial markets clearly was triggered by a dramatic weakening of underwriting standards for U.S. subprime mortgages, beginning in late 2004 and extending into 2007" OOPS



I GUESS DUBYA/GOP CHEERING ON A BANKSTER BUBBLE HAD CONSEQUENCES BUBS?

 

[Wyatt earp]

[

You still can't comprehend the difference between taxes and charity can you?



5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.

.

Liberals really don't believe in charity. They are generally not very generous people when it comes to their own personal lives. What they call charity is getting the filthy ass oppressive government to take money away from somebody else to be used to pay their bills. Liberals are greedy assholes for the most part with no concept of personal responsibility or Liberty.

More right wing BS fed to you by the right wing infotainment complex. I'm shocked

Study: Conservatives and liberals are equally charitable, but they give to different charities
Study: Conservatives and liberals are equally charitable, but they give to different charities

BROOKS IS A NUTJOB LIAR

We know liberals give to their favorite coke dealer charity..



And the rest ...of the liberals we know that also how much they give


Biden gave average of $369 to charity a year




.

 

[JonKoch]

"Republicans ruined the economy no matter how much the Democrat congress spent and Obama doubling Bush's debt?"


Know what happens when you inherit 20% of GDP in revenues and spending then dump revenues to 14.6% AS you blow up spending to almost 24% of GDP like Dubya/GOP did?

Care to give the law or policies Obama passed or had that did that?

Obama care, 4,000 regulations and rules by the EPA

.

Weird you can't critically think (HINT ACA 100% FUNDED, UNLIKE ANYTHING THE GOP EVER PASSES) :


They Called Obamacare A 'Job-Killer.'

Top Ex-White House Economist Admits 94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time | Zero Hedge

LMAOROG, You're a crazy MF Bubs



Hey but lying floats your boat, keep it up

Truth hurts ?




3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions



.

If you "believe" the BS from your blog Bubs, go for it

 

[Wyatt earp]

[

You still can't comprehend the difference between taxes and charity can you?



5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.

.

Liberals really don't believe in charity. They are generally not very generous people when it comes to their own personal lives. What they call charity is getting the filthy ass oppressive government to take money away from somebody else to be used to pay their bills. Liberals are greedy assholes for the most part with no concept of personal responsibility or Liberty.

More right wing BS fed to you by the right wing infotainment complex. I'm shocked

Study: Conservatives and liberals are equally charitable, but they give to different charities
Study: Conservatives and liberals are equally charitable, but they give to different charities

BROOKS IS A NUTJOB LIAR

We know liberals give to their favorite coke dealer charity..



And the rest ...of the liberals we know that also how much they give


Biden gave average of $369 to charity a year




.

Good job $360 bucks in one year




We proud of liberals

 

[JonKoch]

Care to point to ONE policy since the US Founding that CONservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history?


How about one policy the past 50 years the GOP passed that worked as promised?

They were correct about staying out of WW I and WW II. They have always been correct about opposing socialist government boondoggles like Social Security, welfare and Medicare. They were correct about the folly of going off the gold standard, opposing the income tax and opposing the 17th Amendment.

So NOTHING were they on the correct side of US history, though I'm happy to see someone is being honest about them being isolationist during BOTH WW's

SS the best anti poverty program in the US? Keeps almost half of seniors out of poverty?? lol

Medicare? Oh right that thing that gets above 80% approval rating and costs 3% to administer...

Your claims are all leftwing propaganda and bullshit. everyone would be far wealthier when they retire if they had the 15% of their income the government takes to invest. Our GDP would have increased at a far greater rate if government hadn't pissed that money down the sewer.,

The idea that getting involved in WW I was a good idea was rejected by the entire country after the war. Any fool could see that taking sides in that mess was a foolish.

I could go on all day, but that's enough to show what a moron you are.

How'd they do before SS again? How about Chile's example where they are STILL subsidizing BECAUSE costs ate up supposed returns YET still most who went private (except the most well off), are dirt poor in poverty?



Your BS premise is destroyed Bubs

That's total ******* bullshit.

They did fine before SSN, although not during the Great Depression. Obviously, virtually no one did fine then. Most people had a good sized nest egg saved up when government wasn't fleecing them for everything they earned.

LMAOROG, Yes the country hadn't changed since the GOP first great depression

 

[JonKoch]

[

You still can't comprehend the difference between taxes and charity can you?



5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.

.

Liberals really don't believe in charity. They are generally not very generous people when it comes to their own personal lives. What they call charity is getting the filthy ass oppressive government to take money away from somebody else to be used to pay their bills. Liberals are greedy assholes for the most part with no concept of personal responsibility or Liberty.

More right wing BS fed to you by the right wing infotainment complex. I'm shocked

Study: Conservatives and liberals are equally charitable, but they give to different charities
Study: Conservatives and liberals are equally charitable, but they give to different charities

BROOKS IS A NUTJOB LIAR

We know liberals give to their favorite coke dealer charity..



And the rest ...of the liberals we know that also how much they give


Biden gave average of $369 to charity a year




.

I get it Bubba you hate scientific studies and science

 

[danielpalos]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Only in right wing fantasy. Y'alls specialization in Red Herrings, "proves" it.

No red herrings read the liberal posters here on my thread....that keep confirming my OP.

How many knock down liberal threads do us conservative posters make hers on USMB?

Since I have been here.


The score is like 1,089,580,000 liberals hate cons

5 conservatives hate liberals.


.

It is the right wing that "hates on the poor" in every thread about taxes or social spending.

Daniel pal you just said what my number 6 talked about in my OP



6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?

.

How is Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, Any form of Personal fault or responsibility? It is "public policy" under our form of Capitalism, merely for the bottom line of the rich, not equal protection of the law.