7 reasons why liberals are incapable of understanding the world

[bripat9643]

6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility.

Their plight in life is always the fault of somebody else ...

You mean like the way Trump blames everything on Obama.

Someone tapped my phone - Obama
Healthcare costs - Obama
Iran - Obama
North Korea - Obama

Who else would be to blame?

 

[bripat9643]

For instance, on the issue of economics the stupid Liberals think the solution is higher taxation, more deficit spending and taking money away from the people that earned it and giving it away to the special interest groups that didn't earn the money. How convoluted is that?

Liberals do 'tax and spend' , but at least they balance the budget. Republicans did 'borrow and spend' and like Reagan and Bush, tripled and doubled the national debt. For people like you, it means they left debts three times, and two times the size they inherited.

Really? How did that go during the Obama administration?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Spits the imbecile who claims Obama gave money in an election when there was no election happening when the money was given.

Republicans know that democrats have ESP, they can predict the future. Obama knew that Netanyahu was going to schedule a surprise election

Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland

So we could get gorsuch..



Why did you set yourself up for that?



.

You are truly insane.

Republicans began their confirmation blockade in March, 2016...

GOP Senators Are Already Saying They Will Block Merrick Garland’s Nomination

... which Republicans believed Hillary couldn't lose the election back then?

They rolled the dice just like voice one and V15 did...


So no critical thinking skills once again by you Fawn huh?


Still upset no stats you can pull out of your ass on this thread?


lol

.

Which means your post, "Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland. So we could get gorsuch.. Why did you set yourself up for that," gets flushed down the toilet since you now claim it was based on a gamble. Whereas, there's no evidence Obama gave that money to OneVoice on a gamble that Netanyahu would fire his cabinet and call for a special election.

You trying to hard Fawn, again the question was about did Obama and his crew interfere in Israels election...


I provided enough evidence to convict Obama in the 9 circuit court.


You provided none to say he didn't.


.

 

[bripat9643]

I know these guys are so retarded like that John kosh dude above, the thread was about did Obama meddle in Israels election of course he did, but this idiot wants to move the goal post to an irrelevant answer.



.

You're ******* deranged.

How did Obama meddle in an election that wasn't scheduled until after the money was given?

Again you ******* asshole moron did you read the god damn report ?


.

Of course I read it. That's how I know it says nothing about trying to influence an election. And again, how could it since there was no election scheduled at the time the money was given?

It also states there was nothing wrong with giving the money.

You're just a ******* imbecile conservative.

Yes there was , it's illegal to use tax payer money to influence a foreign election and they found away around it.

But again that's not what the argument was about, the argument was did Obama and his hence man meddle in Israels election.


Their is no doubt that he did. We all know he was siding more with the Palestine



We seen it

The issue returned to the headlines when the United Nations Security Council recently voted 14 to 0 to condemn Israeli settlements. The United States, which often vetoes resolutions critical of Israel, abstained and allowed the resolution to pass.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded angrily, unleashing a stream of accusations against the Obama administration. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry defended the U.S. position Wednesday in a lengthy speech that repeatedly admonished Israel over settlements.



.

LOLOL

You're such a rightard.

Try explaining how money given before December, 2014, was meant to influence an election that was scheduled IN December, 2014.......

So you believe it would be more effective to give the money after the election?

 

[JonKoch]

"Obama has been sending taxpayer dollars, at least $350,000 to fund anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for (the) election."

Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel

Here is the Senate report you stupid ****



Majority Media | Media | Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee







Senate Report: State Department Funded Effort to Overthrow Netanyahu

11:27 AM, JUL 12, 2016 | By JIM SWIFT

Your assertions are LIES. Obama did not fund a campaign to unseat Netanyahu, nor did he "meddle" in the Israeli elections.

The State Department funded peace efforts and negotiations. When the negotiations collapsed, the NGO used the funds for other purposes, but your post and the blog connected to it implied that Obama tried to get rid of Netanyahu which is "Mostly False".

It's like giving your teenager $30 to go get a pizza, and instead the kid buys liquor with the money. Are you guilty of giving your underage kid liquor?

Proving point one in the OP. You are unaware of the truth and refuse to accept it, when provided.

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Apparently republicans are extremely mentally disordered. According to "bear" they vote for liberals all the time and don't even realize it.

Did you even think about this when you vote?


View attachment 127943



.

 

[Faun]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Only in right wing fantasy. Y'alls specialization in Red Herrings, "proves" it.

No red herrings read the liberal posters here on my thread....that keep confirming my OP.

How many knock down liberal threads do us conservative posters make hers on USMB?

Since I have been here.


The score is like 1,089,580,000 liberals hate cons

5 conservatives hate liberals.


.

I don't speak for any other Liberals here, but I post purely for the entertainment value you rightards provide. Just as you are doing in this thread where you idiotically claim Obama gave money to overthrow Netanyahu in an election no one knew would be held.

I'm certainly not here to educate you fools as I have learned a loooong time ago -- conservatives are ineducable.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Spits the imbecile who claims Obama gave money in an election when there was no election happening when the money was given.

Republicans know that democrats have ESP, they can predict the future. Obama knew that Netanyahu was going to schedule a surprise election

Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland

So we could get gorsuch..



Why did you set yourself up for that?



.

You are truly insane.

Republicans began their confirmation blockade in March, 2016...

GOP Senators Are Already Saying They Will Block Merrick Garland’s Nomination

... which Republicans believed Hillary couldn't lose the election back then?

They rolled the dice just like voice one and V15 did...


So no critical thinking skills once again by you Fawn huh?


Still upset no stats you can pull out of your ass on this thread?


lol

.

Which means your post, "Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland. So we could get gorsuch.. Why did you set yourself up for that," gets flushed down the toilet since you now claim it was based on a gamble. Whereas, there's no evidence Obama gave that money to OneVoice on a gamble that Netanyahu would fire his cabinet and call for a special election.

It's amusing you are trying your best to throw this thread in the bad lands .
Try try again.....




.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Here is the Senate report you stupid ****



Majority Media | Media | Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee







Senate Report: State Department Funded Effort to Overthrow Netanyahu

11:27 AM, JUL 12, 2016 | By JIM SWIFT

Your assertions are LIES. Obama did not fund a campaign to unseat Netanyahu, nor did he "meddle" in the Israeli elections.

The State Department funded peace efforts and negotiations. When the negotiations collapsed, the NGO used the funds for other purposes, but your post and the blog connected to it implied that Obama tried to get rid of Netanyahu which is "Mostly False".

It's like giving your teenager $30 to go get a pizza, and instead the kid buys liquor with the money. Are you guilty of giving your underage kid liquor?

Proving point one in the OP. You are unaware of the truth and refuse to accept it, when provided.

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Apparently republicans are extremely mentally disordered. According to "bear" they vote for liberals all the time and don't even realize it.

Did you even think about this when you vote?


View attachment 127943



.

What does that have to do with my thread?


But OK are you jealous that Obama didn't bring these 1,000s of jobs to your blue States ?

Thanks Nikki Haley..

.

 

[Faun]

Republicans know that democrats have ESP, they can predict the future. Obama knew that Netanyahu was going to schedule a surprise election

Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland

So we could get gorsuch..



Why did you set yourself up for that?



.

You are truly insane.

Republicans began their confirmation blockade in March, 2016...

GOP Senators Are Already Saying They Will Block Merrick Garland’s Nomination

... which Republicans believed Hillary couldn't lose the election back then?

They rolled the dice just like voice one and V15 did...


So no critical thinking skills once again by you Fawn huh?


Still upset no stats you can pull out of your ass on this thread?


lol

.

Which means your post, "Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland. So we could get gorsuch.. Why did you set yourself up for that," gets flushed down the toilet since you now claim it was based on a gamble. Whereas, there's no evidence Obama gave that money to OneVoice on a gamble that Netanyahu would fire his cabinet and call for a special election.

You trying to hard Fawn, again the question was about did Obama and his crew interfere in Israels election...


I provided enough evidence to convict Obama in the 9 circuit court.


You provided none to say he didn't.


.

Now you're lying. Clear confirmation even you know you lost the argument, even if you're not man enough to admit it.

As far as me not providing anything to disassemble your idiocy... to recap-- you claimed Obama funneled money in an election to overthrow Netanyahu and I used your own link to prove Obama gave the money before anyone knew there would even be an election.

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Only in right wing fantasy. Y'alls specialization in Red Herrings, "proves" it.

No red herrings read the liberal posters here on my thread....that keep confirming my OP.

How many knock down liberal threads do us conservative posters make hers on USMB?

Since I have been here.


The score is like 1,089,580,000 liberals hate cons

5 conservatives hate liberals.


.

I don't speak for any other Liberals here, but I post purely for the entertainment value you rightards provide. Just as you are doing in this thread where you idiotically claim Obama gave money to overthrow Netanyahu in an election no one knew would be held.

I'm certainly not here to educate you fools as I have learned a loooong time ago -- conservatives are ineducable.

Spits the imbecile who claims Obama gave money in an election when there was no election happening when the money was given.

Republicans know that democrats have ESP, they can predict the future. Obama knew that Netanyahu was going to schedule a surprise election

Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland

So we could get gorsuch..



Why did you set yourself up for that?



.

You are truly insane.

Republicans began their confirmation blockade in March, 2016...

GOP Senators Are Already Saying They Will Block Merrick Garland’s Nomination

... which Republicans believed Hillary couldn't lose the election back then?

They rolled the dice just like voice one and V15 did...


So no critical thinking skills once again by you Fawn huh?


Still upset no stats you can pull out of your ass on this thread?


lol

.

Which means your post, "Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland. So we could get gorsuch.. Why did you set yourself up for that," gets flushed down the toilet since you now claim it was based on a gamble. Whereas, there's no evidence Obama gave that money to OneVoice on a gamble that Netanyahu would fire his cabinet and call for a special election.

So my black guy didn't explain it clearly enough for you?






.

 

[Faun]

You're ******* deranged.

How did Obama meddle in an election that wasn't scheduled until after the money was given?

Again you ******* asshole moron did you read the god damn report ?


.

Of course I read it. That's how I know it says nothing about trying to influence an election. And again, how could it since there was no election scheduled at the time the money was given?

It also states there was nothing wrong with giving the money.

You're just a ******* imbecile conservative.

Yes there was , it's illegal to use tax payer money to influence a foreign election and they found away around it.

But again that's not what the argument was about, the argument was did Obama and his hence man meddle in Israels election.


Their is no doubt that he did. We all know he was siding more with the Palestine



We seen it

The issue returned to the headlines when the United Nations Security Council recently voted 14 to 0 to condemn Israeli settlements. The United States, which often vetoes resolutions critical of Israel, abstained and allowed the resolution to pass.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded angrily, unleashing a stream of accusations against the Obama administration. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry defended the U.S. position Wednesday in a lengthy speech that repeatedly admonished Israel over settlements.



.

LOLOL

You're such a rightard.

Try explaining how money given before December, 2014, was meant to influence an election that was scheduled IN December, 2014.......

So you believe it would be more effective to give the money after the election?

You're ******* nuts, con. No one suggested any such thing.

 

[Faun]

Republicans know that democrats have ESP, they can predict the future. Obama knew that Netanyahu was going to schedule a surprise election

Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland

So we could get gorsuch..



Why did you set yourself up for that?



.

You are truly insane.

Republicans began their confirmation blockade in March, 2016...

GOP Senators Are Already Saying They Will Block Merrick Garland’s Nomination

... which Republicans believed Hillary couldn't lose the election back then?

They rolled the dice just like voice one and V15 did...


So no critical thinking skills once again by you Fawn huh?


Still upset no stats you can pull out of your ass on this thread?


lol

.

Which means your post, "Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland. So we could get gorsuch.. Why did you set yourself up for that," gets flushed down the toilet since you now claim it was based on a gamble. Whereas, there's no evidence Obama gave that money to OneVoice on a gamble that Netanyahu would fire his cabinet and call for a special election.

It's amusing you are trying your best to throw this thread in the bad lands .
Try try again.....




.

How is *****-slapping the stupid out of you trying to get this thread into badlands?

And what difference does it make where it is? It's still based on your moronic claim that Obama gave money to overthrow Netanyahu in an election Obama had no idea would take place.

 

[edthecynic]

I didn't run away

You ran to THIS thread!!!

I was still on the other thread **** head..


Again what do you have to back up your silly claim that obamadid not interfere in the election?



.

You can't possibly be that thick!

 

[bripat9643]

Again you ******* asshole moron did you read the god damn report ?


.

Of course I read it. That's how I know it says nothing about trying to influence an election. And again, how could it since there was no election scheduled at the time the money was given?

It also states there was nothing wrong with giving the money.

You're just a ******* imbecile conservative.

Yes there was , it's illegal to use tax payer money to influence a foreign election and they found away around it.

But again that's not what the argument was about, the argument was did Obama and his hence man meddle in Israels election.


Their is no doubt that he did. We all know he was siding more with the Palestine



We seen it

The issue returned to the headlines when the United Nations Security Council recently voted 14 to 0 to condemn Israeli settlements. The United States, which often vetoes resolutions critical of Israel, abstained and allowed the resolution to pass.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded angrily, unleashing a stream of accusations against the Obama administration. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry defended the U.S. position Wednesday in a lengthy speech that repeatedly admonished Israel over settlements.



.

LOLOL

You're such a rightard.

Try explaining how money given before December, 2014, was meant to influence an election that was scheduled IN December, 2014.......

So you believe it would be more effective to give the money after the election?

You're ******* nuts, con. No one suggested any such thing.

You just said it. You ridiculed the notion that giving the money before the election would be useful. That leaves after the election.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland

So we could get gorsuch..



Why did you set yourself up for that?



.

You are truly insane.

Republicans began their confirmation blockade in March, 2016...

GOP Senators Are Already Saying They Will Block Merrick Garland’s Nomination

... which Republicans believed Hillary couldn't lose the election back then?

They rolled the dice just like voice one and V15 did...


So no critical thinking skills once again by you Fawn huh?


Still upset no stats you can pull out of your ass on this thread?


lol

.

Which means your post, "Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland. So we could get gorsuch.. Why did you set yourself up for that," gets flushed down the toilet since you now claim it was based on a gamble. Whereas, there's no evidence Obama gave that money to OneVoice on a gamble that Netanyahu would fire his cabinet and call for a special election.

You trying to hard Fawn, again the question was about did Obama and his crew interfere in Israels election...


I provided enough evidence to convict Obama in the 9 circuit court.


You provided none to say he didn't.


.

Now you're lying. Clear confirmation even you know you lost the argument, even if you're not man enough to admit it.

As far as me not providing anything to disassemble your idiocy... to recap-- you claimed Obama funneled money in an election to overthrow Netanyahu and I used your own link to prove Obama gave the money before anyone knew there would even be an election.

This really upsets you doesn't it?

Did Obama meddle in the isreal elections?

That's the question and again I provided enough proof to convict Obama in the 9th circuit court..
.


You didn't prove nothing except being butt hurt

 

[JonKoch]

Right wingers are delusional. They truly believe ignorance give them insight. That everything can be looked at in a way that's simple. Because they are simpletons.

Too bad they don't spend more time building and creating. Their obvious envy is pathetic. They can only build their self esteem by tearing others down. If you have nothing to show your only option is as a credit snatcher. For instance, like trying to take credit for taking down Bin Laden. Or after Republicans ruined the economy under Bush, the Democrats brought us back to prosperity. And so Republicans whine, "You didn't bring us far enough so you failed". Worse, their only policies are the very ones that ruined the economy under Bush. They have learned nothing of value. And still, they toot a rusty and old out of tune horn. Sad. It's not even a horn. It's a kazoo.

Aw, a baby libtard pooped his diapers. How cute. All you have is hate, lies and smears. Republicans ruined the economy no matter how much the Democrat congress spent and Obama doubling Bush's debt? Another hallmark of liberalism is sheer stupidity. Your little pea brains are easy to manipulate.

"Republicans ruined the economy no matter how much the Democrat congress spent and Obama doubling Bush's debt?"


Know what happens when you inherit 20% of GDP in revenues and spending then dump revenues to 14.6% AS you blow up spending to almost 24% of GDP like Dubya/GOP did?

Care to give the law or policies Obama passed or had that did that?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Of course I read it. That's how I know it says nothing about trying to influence an election. And again, how could it since there was no election scheduled at the time the money was given?

It also states there was nothing wrong with giving the money.

You're just a ******* imbecile conservative.

Yes there was , it's illegal to use tax payer money to influence a foreign election and they found away around it.

But again that's not what the argument was about, the argument was did Obama and his hence man meddle in Israels election.


Their is no doubt that he did. We all know he was siding more with the Palestine



We seen it

The issue returned to the headlines when the United Nations Security Council recently voted 14 to 0 to condemn Israeli settlements. The United States, which often vetoes resolutions critical of Israel, abstained and allowed the resolution to pass.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded angrily, unleashing a stream of accusations against the Obama administration. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry defended the U.S. position Wednesday in a lengthy speech that repeatedly admonished Israel over settlements.



.

LOLOL

You're such a rightard.

Try explaining how money given before December, 2014, was meant to influence an election that was scheduled IN December, 2014.......

So you believe it would be more effective to give the money after the election?

You're ******* nuts, con. No one suggested any such thing.

You just said it. You ridiculed the notion that giving the money before the election would be useful. That leaves after the election.

Great eye...

.

 

[Faun]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Only in right wing fantasy. Y'alls specialization in Red Herrings, "proves" it.

No red herrings read the liberal posters here on my thread....that keep confirming my OP.

How many knock down liberal threads do us conservative posters make hers on USMB?

Since I have been here.


The score is like 1,089,580,000 liberals hate cons

5 conservatives hate liberals.


.

I don't speak for any other Liberals here, but I post purely for the entertainment value you rightards provide. Just as you are doing in this thread where you idiotically claim Obama gave money to overthrow Netanyahu in an election no one knew would be held.

I'm certainly not here to educate you fools as I have learned a loooong time ago -- conservatives are ineducable.

Republicans know that democrats have ESP, they can predict the future. Obama knew that Netanyahu was going to schedule a surprise election

Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland

So we could get gorsuch..



Why did you set yourself up for that?



.

You are truly insane.

Republicans began their confirmation blockade in March, 2016...

GOP Senators Are Already Saying They Will Block Merrick Garland’s Nomination

... which Republicans believed Hillary couldn't lose the election back then?

They rolled the dice just like voice one and V15 did...


So no critical thinking skills once again by you Fawn huh?


Still upset no stats you can pull out of your ass on this thread?


lol

.

Which means your post, "Of course, just like we have ESP and knew Hillary would lose that's why Republicans refused to confirm Garland. So we could get gorsuch.. Why did you set yourself up for that," gets flushed down the toilet since you now claim it was based on a gamble. Whereas, there's no evidence Obama gave that money to OneVoice on a gamble that Netanyahu would fire his cabinet and call for a special election.

So my black guy didn't explain it clearly enough for you?






.

You're even crazier than I gave you credit for if you think I'm gonna waste 7½ minutes of my life watching that video.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Right wingers are delusional. They truly believe ignorance give them insight. That everything can be looked at in a way that's simple. Because they are simpletons.

Too bad they don't spend more time building and creating. Their obvious envy is pathetic. They can only build their self esteem by tearing others down. If you have nothing to show your only option is as a credit snatcher. For instance, like trying to take credit for taking down Bin Laden. Or after Republicans ruined the economy under Bush, the Democrats brought us back to prosperity. And so Republicans whine, "You didn't bring us far enough so you failed". Worse, their only policies are the very ones that ruined the economy under Bush. They have learned nothing of value. And still, they toot a rusty and old out of tune horn. Sad. It's not even a horn. It's a kazoo.

Aw, a baby libtard pooped his diapers. How cute. All you have is hate, lies and smears. Republicans ruined the economy no matter how much the Democrat congress spent and Obama doubling Bush's debt? Another hallmark of liberalism is sheer stupidity. Your little pea brains are easy to manipulate.

"Republicans ruined the economy no matter how much the Democrat congress spent and Obama doubling Bush's debt?"


Know what happens when you inherit 20% of GDP in revenues and spending then dump revenues to 14.6% AS you blow up spending to almost 24% of GDP like Dubya/GOP did?

Care to give the law or policies Obama passed or had that did that?

Obama care, 4,000 regulations and rules by the EPA

.

 

[Faun]

I didn't run away

You ran to THIS thread!!!

I was still on the other thread **** head..


Again what do you have to back up your silly claim that obamadid not interfere in the election?



.

You can't possibly be that thick!

Why not?