I mean, you never see any enlightened, non-white countries
List some of these countries. Pretty please.
China, Zimbabwe, South Africa (since the end of Apartheid), Peru, Rwanda--really just any country where over 50% of the population isn't white. Pick anywhere outside of Europe and the Anglosphere.
throwing out white people just for being white, or raging about "hurr no amnesty 4 da euros". It's an exclusively white activity.
Interesting. Is English not your first language? In English, when you use the phrase "just for" you convey the point that "this is the only reason" and we know that illegal infiltrators are not wanted because 1.) they broke the law, 2.) they don't speak English, 3.) they're poor 4.) They're uneducated 5.) We don't have enough jobs for them. All of these reasons invalidate your claim that the only reason we want to kick these people out of the country is because they're Hispanic.
Actually, none of those reasons invalidate anything. Let me tell you why each of them is wrong.
1. What law did they brake? Please cite for me the exact law, linking to its full text if at all possible.
2. This is only a problem because most Americans don't speak Spanish. If we were as enlightened and forward-thinking as the rest of the world, the average American could speak 3 languages or more.
3. So are many native-born Americans, but you don't see calls for them to be deported. This isn't a finance-based hatred, it's clearly a racial one.
4. Nope. The country most blamed for illegal immigration,
Mexico, has a very advanced educational system, so I'd like to see you back up your claim with evidence. Here's proof of my absolute correctitude:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_Mexico
5. Actually, we do--otherwise we wouldn't be seeing the immense butthurt from the conservatard crowd complaining about how these immigrants "took our jobs".