312 - 226

[BULLDOG]

We have all seen those numbers posted here. They are the electoral college spread of trump's current presidency. I think it is intended to indicate some kind of mandate for trump. However that spread is a poor showing when compared to other president's electoral college spread. Obama and Clinton both exceeded that spread in each of their first and second elections. It's highly doubtful that those who regularly use those numbers as a goto answer to virtually any post will reconsider their continued use. Facts don't seem to matter to those folks. Somebody told them that quoting those numbers had some kind of meaning, and that's good enough for them.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Whatever helps you reconcile that asskicking you got last year.

 

[Chuz Life]

Whatever helps you reconcile that asskicking you got last year.

Damn sure left a mark on that one.

 

[Concerned American]

We have all seen those numbers posted here. They are the electoral college spread of trump's current presidency. I think it is intended to indicate some kind of mandate for trump. However that spread is a poor showing when compared to other president's electoral college spread. Obama and Clinton both exceeded that spread in each of their first and second elections. It's highly doubtful that those who regularly use those numbers as a goto answer to virtually any post will reconsider their continued use. Facts don't seem to matter to those folks. Somebody told them that quoting those numbers had some kind of meaning, and that's good enough for them.
View attachment 1143034

Here's what they mean--Trump is the 47th POTUS and Clinton, Biden or Obama are not. Any other questions? 312-226.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

We have all seen those numbers posted here. They are the electoral college spread of trump's current presidency. I think it is intended to indicate some kind of mandate for trump. However that spread is a poor showing when compared to other president's electoral college spread. Obama and Clinton both exceeded that spread in each of their first and second elections. It's highly doubtful that those who regularly use those numbers as a goto answer to virtually any post will reconsider their continued use. Facts don't seem to matter to those folks. Somebody told them that quoting those numbers had some kind of meaning, and that's good enough for them.
View attachment 1143034

 

[jknowgood]

We have all seen those numbers posted here. They are the electoral college spread of trump's current presidency. I think it is intended to indicate some kind of mandate for trump. However that spread is a poor showing when compared to other president's electoral college spread. Obama and Clinton both exceeded that spread in each of their first and second elections. It's highly doubtful that those who regularly use those numbers as a goto answer to virtually any post will reconsider their continued use. Facts don't seem to matter to those folks. Somebody told them that quoting those numbers had some kind of meaning, and that's good enough for them.
View attachment 1143034

 

[BULLDOG]

Whatever helps you reconcile that asskicking you got last year.

Like I said. You cult members think it is a convincing remark, no matter what the facts are

 

[Man With A Plan]

We have all seen those numbers posted here. They are the electoral college spread of trump's current presidency. I think it is intended to indicate some kind of mandate for trump. However that spread is a poor showing when compared to other president's electoral college spread. Obama and Clinton both exceeded that spread in each of their first and second elections. It's highly doubtful that those who regularly use those numbers as a goto answer to virtually any post will reconsider their continued use. Facts don't seem to matter to those folks. Somebody told them that quoting those numbers had some kind of meaning, and that's good enough for them.
View attachment 1143034

Gee, I wonder how much better those numbers would have been if the left hadn't kept Trump tied up in four different court rooms for weeks at a time? He kicked your asses DESPITE your lawfare, Bulldog and he hasn't stopped kicking your asses since he got back in office! Just think, Little Buddy...you've got another 3 1/2 YEARS of this!

 

[progressive hunter]

We have all seen those numbers posted here. They are the electoral college spread of trump's current presidency. I think it is intended to indicate some kind of mandate for trump. However that spread is a poor showing when compared to other president's electoral college spread. Obama and Clinton both exceeded that spread in each of their first and second elections. It's highly doubtful that those who regularly use those numbers as a goto answer to virtually any post will reconsider their continued use. Facts don't seem to matter to those folks. Somebody told them that quoting those numbers had some kind of meaning, and that's good enough for them.
View attachment 1143034

are you still crying about losing??

 

[TemplarKormac]

Like I said. You cult members think it is a convincing remark, no matter what the facts are

The fact you're still rehashing it means you're still in denial.

The facts are meaningless for someone in your frame of mind.

 

[jknowgood]

Like I said. You cult members think it is a convincing remark, no matter what the facts are

The only fact is, Trump is making America great again! I know you hate that.

 

[Rogue AI]

Like I said. You cult members think it is a convincing remark, no matter what the facts are

The facts are: Trump won. Get over it and seek treatment for your TDS.

 

[BackAgain]

We have all seen those numbers posted here. They are the electoral college spread of trump's current presidency. I think it is intended to indicate some kind of mandate for trump. However that spread is a poor showing when compared to other president's electoral college spread. Obama and Clinton both exceeded that spread in each of their first and second elections. It's highly doubtful that those who regularly use those numbers as a goto answer to virtually any post will reconsider their continued use. Facts don't seem to matter to those folks. Somebody told them that quoting those numbers had some kind of meaning, and that's good enough for them.
View attachment 1143034

He won. Period. Therefore, he has the mandate.

Learn how our system works. You won’t sound so stupid all the time that way.

 

[BluesLegend]

We have all seen those numbers posted here. They are the electoral college spread of trump's current presidency. I think it is intended to indicate some kind of mandate for trump.

Trump won every swing state AND your precious popular vote fool. Dems got ***** SLAPPED and that's after filth Democrats threw everything and the kitchen sink at the guy. Including corrupting multiple government agencies and the judicial branch.

That's getting your ass handed to you, tissue?

 

[BluesLegend]

I love these Dem 'we really didn't get destroyed' threads. Especially when Dem's approval is at all time historic lows.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Somebody told them that quoting those numbers had some kind of meaning, and that's good enough for them.

What mandate?

There is nothing official about it.

If you win by one vote, you are in power and you push as hard as you can if that is what you want.

All this talk of mandates is garbage.

If you win, you rule.

 

[HikerGuy83]

He won. Period. Therefore, he has the mandate.

Learn how our system works. You won’t sound so stupid all the time that way.

Amen

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

We have all seen those numbers posted here. They are the electoral college spread of trump's current presidency. I think it is intended to indicate some kind of mandate for trump. However that spread is a poor showing when compared to other president's electoral college spread. Obama and Clinton both exceeded that spread in each of their first and second elections. It's highly doubtful that those who regularly use those numbers as a goto answer to virtually any post will reconsider their continued use. Facts don't seem to matter to those folks. Somebody told them that quoting those numbers had some kind of meaning, and that's good enough for them.
View attachment 1143034

 

[HeyNorm]

We have all seen those numbers posted here. They are the electoral college spread of trump's current presidency. I think it is intended to indicate some kind of mandate for trump. However that spread is a poor showing when compared to other president's electoral college spread. Obama and Clinton both exceeded that spread in each of their first and second elections. It's highly doubtful that those who regularly use those numbers as a goto answer to virtually any post will reconsider their continued use. Facts don't seem to matter to those folks. Somebody told them that quoting those numbers had some kind of meaning, and that's good enough for them.
View attachment 1143034

Now consider your candidate spent over 2 Billion to get ***** slapped.

 

[Nostra]

We have all seen those numbers posted here. They are the electoral college spread of trump's current presidency. I think it is intended to indicate some kind of mandate for trump. However that spread is a poor showing when compared to other president's electoral college spread. Obama and Clinton both exceeded that spread in each of their first and second elections. It's highly doubtful that those who regularly use those numbers as a goto answer to virtually any post will reconsider their continued use. Facts don't seem to matter to those folks. Somebody told them that quoting those numbers had some kind of meaning, and that's good enough for them.
View attachment 1143034

Has anyone claimed Trump is the only president who won in a landslide and was given a huge mandate by the American people?

Nope.


Thread fail.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!