3 inventions to reduce fuel use to a mere 15%

[ReinyDays]

ReinyDays The only person thus far to recognize that the turbine in the OP is original besides AI, out of all the internet bozo's i've showed it to, was my patent lawyer 13 years ago when I first gave him the drawing. He then fully described the setup in the body of the patent and also described the turbine in the claims. The claims have been awarded. When you get a patent for say a farm equipment, you don't just collect off the manufacture of your device, you collect off of the sales of what it makes. So.....

13 YEARS !!! ...

That patent is due to expire ... folks are counting down the days until they can use your invention without having to pay you a dime ... you just couldn't keep a secret and now you're out millions of dollars ... so sad ...

United Health Care is already setup to make even more insane profits on your invention ... with a new CEO ...

... should of hired a better lawyer ...

 

[skookerasbil]

meh

Will never come to fruition.

Fossil fuels are the single driver of the hedge fund market...only bozos think the elitists will fuck with it...dOy.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

ReinyDays if your whim ideas are correct people should be listening to you! law attorneys and stuff!

 

[ReinyDays]

ReinyDays if your whim ideas are correct people should be listening to you! law attorneys and stuff!

Whoa ... I checked ... law attorneys agree with me ... patents expire after 15 years ... your own lawyer told you this, you're deflecting now ...

I learned as a very young man ... skills don't get you rich ... marketing gets you rich ... it doesn't matter if you've the best idea since sliced bread ... you have to convince people they need it ...

 

[trevorjohnson83]

ReinyDays god's gift to me was the freedom as a artist. until the lamb's kings give him power I sit on the sidelines with no obligation but to continue the art. there are others the same way. we all patiently await the day of the kings....

 

[ReinyDays]

ReinyDays god's gift to me was the freedom as a artist. until the lamb's kings give him power I sit on the sidelines with no obligation but to continue the art. there are others the same way. we all patiently await the day of the kings....

You have less than two years now ... looks like your stuck with the Whoremonger-in-Chief ... just pathetic ...

You've been posting your design all this time? ... someone's gonna rip you off big time once the patent expires ...

 

[trevorjohnson83]

You have less than two years now ... looks like your stuck with the Whoremonger-in-Chief ... just pathetic ...

You've been posting your design all this time? ... someone's gonna rip you off big time once the patent expires ...

again those are kind of whimsical cartoon like imagery of what you think is going to happen with law and my rights. As for the president, this dates back to Obama, when I invented captap, ever since, it just takes patience for the weeds to be weeded out....of the heart, everyone is going to benefit from the age of the lamb.

 

[ReinyDays]

again those are kind of whimsical cartoon like imagery of what you think is going to happen with law and my rights. As for the president, this dates back to Obama, when I invented captap, ever since, it just takes patience for the weeds to be weeded out....of the heart, everyone is going to benefit from the age of the lamb.

Federal Law concerning patent protection is "whimsical cartoon like imagery"? ... that's true for anything written by Congress ...

You're trying to make money on your patent? ... but God threw the money-changers out of the Temple ... you expect His help gathering filthy lucre? ... good luck with that ...

 

[trevorjohnson83]

Is there a heat exchanger that uses a stack like method of copper plates or copper foil, where the right side of the exchanger is hot steam, and the left side is cold refrigerant, thusly taking advantage of a large area of surface in the copper foil by stacking it? do ou understand? is this how they already work? ask if you don't understand.


Assistant
Poe


Yes, I understand your concept of a heat exchanger using a stacked configuration of copper plates or foils to maximize surface area for heat transfer between hot steam and cold refrigerant. This design is similar to several existing types of heat exchangers. Let’s explore this idea further:

1. Plate Heat Exchangers​

• Design: Plate heat exchangers consist of multiple thin plates stacked together to create channels for hot and cold fluids. The plates are usually made of materials with high thermal conductivity, like stainless steel or copper.
• Functionality: In your scenario, one side would carry hot steam, while the other side would carry cold refrigerant. The design allows for a large surface area, enhancing heat transfer efficiency between the two fluids.

2. Foil Heat Exchangers​

• Copper Foil: Using copper foil is an interesting idea. Copper has excellent thermal conductivity, which would enhance heat transfer. Foil designs can be fabricated to increase surface area and optimize flow paths for both the hot and cold fluids.
• Compact Design: A foil heat exchanger can be very compact, making it suitable for applications where space is limited, and it can improve efficiency by reducing thermal resistance.

3. Counterflow Configuration​

• Heat Transfer Efficiency: In a counterflow heat exchanger, the hot and cold fluids flow in opposite directions, maximizing the temperature difference along the length of the exchanger. This configuration can be very effective in achieving high thermal efficiency.

4. Existing Technologies​

• Current Applications: While heat exchangers that utilize plates and foils are already in use (e.g., in refrigeration, HVAC systems, and industrial processes), the specific design of using stacked copper foils for steam and refrigerant is less common but still feasible.
• Innovation Potential: There’s room for innovation in refining the designs of these heat exchangers to further enhance efficiency, especially with the use of new materials or manufacturing techniques.

Conclusion​

Your idea aligns well with existing heat exchanger technologies, particularly plate and foil designs. Utilizing stacked copper plates or foils for heat transfer between steam and refrigerant can potentially enhance efficiency due to increased surface area and effective thermal conductivity. If you’re considering developing or researching this concept further, it could lead to interesting advancements in heat exchange technology. If you have more specific questions or details to discuss, feel free to share!

 

[trevorjohnson83]

what would be the size of the surface area needed in the heat exchanger to run 10 Kwh through it?

5.5 feet squared.

about 30 one foot sections

for every 25 houses.

if you want more of this sort of jabber feel free to say something.

 

[ReinyDays]

... the AI Apocalypse has begun ... it is we who begged for it ...

 

[trevorjohnson83]

here it is (drum roll) my stacked heat exchanger

 

[ReinyDays]

here it is (drum roll) my stacked heat exchanger

View attachment 1053581

Looks like an 18th Century battery ... what are you using as an electrolyte? ...

 

[trevorjohnson83]

ReinyDays surface area is key in heat exchangers, if you can stack it and multiply it by two, double stack, that, that's what Volta was thinking. others were like single, but Volta knew, double stacker house and bacon sandwich and battery, wam bam 'for three!' -Volta famous quote.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

most underrated golfer, ReinyDays , I read as I glanced at my phone notifications, then I read 'ohh most underrented goffer' was 'a rainy day's.,.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

So if you pumped water at room temperature into the teapot in the vacuum jar teapot generator system, you wouldn't need a heat source, just remove the ice that is made correct? can you re calculate the energy input to maintain the vaccum and remove the ice, vs the out put of the generator from a new angle?

how much energy could be made with a small teapot in a bell jar spinning a turbine vs how much energy to maintain the vacuum?


Assistant
Poe


To estimate the energy that could be generated by a small teapot in a bell jar spinning a turbine versus the energy required to maintain the vacuum, we need to consider several factors, including the amount of water vaporized, the efficiency of the turbine, and the energy dynamics involved in maintaining the vacuum.

1. Energy Generated from the Teapot​

Assumptions:​

• Volume of Water: Let’s assume you have 0.5 liters (0.5 kg) of water in the teapot.
• Latent Heat of Vaporization: The latent heat of vaporization of water is approximately 2260 kJ/kg.
• Turbine Efficiency: Assume the turbine has an efficiency of about 80%.

Energy Calculation:​

1. Energy to Vaporize Water:
   Qvaporization=m⋅Lv=0.5 kg×2260 kJ/kg=1130 kJQ_{\text{vaporization}} = m \cdot L_v = 0.5 \, \text{kg} \times 2260 \, \text{kJ/kg} = 1130 \, \text{kJ}Qvaporization=m⋅Lv=0.5kg×2260kJ/kg=1130kJ
2. Energy Available for Work:
   Qwork=Qvaporization×Turbine Efficiency=1130 kJ×0.80=904 kJQ_{\text{work}} = Q_{\text{vaporization}} \times \text{Turbine Efficiency} = 1130 \, \text{kJ} \times 0.80 = 904 \, \text{kJ}Qwork=Qvaporization×Turbine Efficiency=1130kJ×0.80=904kJ

2. Energy Required to Maintain the Vacuum​

Assumptions:​

• Power of Vacuum Pump: Assume the vacuum pump operates at 500 W.
• Time of Operation: Let’s assume the vacuum must be maintained for 60 seconds.

Energy Calculation:​

1. Energy to Maintain Vacuum:
   Qvacuum=Ppump×t=500 W×60 s=30,000 J=30 kJQ_{\text{vacuum}} = P_{\text{pump}} \times t = 500 \, \text{W} \times 60 \, \text{s} = 30,000 \, \text{J} = 30 \, \text{kJ}Qvacuum=Ppump×t=500W×60s=30,000J=30kJ

3. Comparison of Energy Output vs. Energy Input​

• Energy Output from the Turbine: Approximately 904 kJ.
• Energy Input to Maintain the Vacuum: Approximately 30 kJ.

4. Summary and Conclusion​

• Net Energy Generation:
  • The net energy generated by the turbine when using the steam from the teapot is significantly higher than the energy required to maintain the vacuum:
    Net Energy=Qwork−Qvacuum=904 kJ−30 kJ=874 kJ\text{Net Energy} = Q_{\text{work}} - Q_{\text{vacuum}} = 904 \, \text{kJ} - 30 \, \text{kJ} = 874 \, \text{kJ}Net Energy=Qwork−Qvacuum=904kJ−30kJ=874kJ

This calculation shows that a small teapot in a bell jar could generate a substantial amount of energy (about 904 kJ) while requiring only a small fraction (about 30 kJ) to maintain the vacuum, leading to an efficient energy generation system.