2nd Circuit revives mother's lawsuit against school's secret grooming/transitioning of daughter

1srelluc

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2021
Messages
78,521
Reaction score
116,040
Points
3,488
Location
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia

Vitsaxaki claimed that the school policy violated her constitutional rights, including both her religious and parental rights to direct her daughter’s upbringing, education, and healthcare—all of which were rejected by federal district court Judge David Hurd (a Clinton appointee who is now senior judge for the northern district of NY) last year.

Judge Hurd applied the more permissive “rational basis” test—rejecting the mother’s argument for “strict scrutiny”—and concluded the school’s policy furthered its legitimate interest in promoting a “safe” learning environment, calling it more “like a civility code that extends the kind of decency students should expect at school.”

Yesterday, the three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the lower court’s dismissal of her constitutional claims and remanded for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Mirabelli v. Bonta

The issue....More like grooming:


Apparently parents DO have a right to know important details about their children's medical affairs.

Judge Hurd exhibited no legal sense at all.
 
It's disgusting all right.

1782515425906.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom