$25K used to go a long way. Just ask Pam Bondi.

[Frankenstein]

There is every indication she is qualified for the role. That seems to leave you angry and frustrated.

Probably an incel!

 

[two_iron]

It's our turn to play "No one is above the law". It looks like a lot of fun.

So bend over and grab your ankles.... relax, don't clench up... and enjoy it.

Here's a good place to start....

 

[two_iron]

trump continually has a chance to quiet critics like me

You've mistaken President Trump for someone that gives a fuck about your mentally ill ramblings. You have to be told that?

I suppose that's part of the illness, ironically. Drano.... think about it.

 

[berg80]

Let the obstruction campaign begin you wouldn't be happy unless Trump left merrick garland in place, elections have consequences.

Remember when Garland was praised by some Repubs as being a great choice for the SC? Why not pick someone with impeccable credentials who has bipartisan support like Biden did?

 

[berg80]

It's our turn to play "No one is above the law".

I predict trump's DoJ will not be able to get indictments for any Dem he tries to go after. You know, the way grand juries indicted trump for multiple crimes.

 

[berg80]

You've mistaken President Trump for someone that gives a fuck about your mentally ill ramblings. You have to be told that?

I suppose that's part of the illness, ironically. Drano.... think about it.

Welcome to my ignore list. You make 54.

 

[Billiejeens]

So where did those 10 million dem votes go?

81 million votes my ass.

One would think that even the most ignorant Democrat would wonder about that.

Nope.

 

[SeaMajor7]

The election was about Dem's being blamed for inflation.

Exit Poll: Reasons for Voting for Trump and Harris​

Today’s Navigator A.M. is the second in a series of releases of findings from our post-election survey among 5,000 self-reported 2024 general election voters. This release focuses on the top reasons that 2024 election voters supported Donald Trump or Kamala Harris, perceptions of their characteristics as candidates for president, and what issues each candidate was seen as most focused on during the presidential election campaign.

Among 2024 voters, the state of the national economy and the level of inflation were seen as reasons to support Trump by double digits.​

Trump held a 12-point advantage among the 2024 electorate on the state of the national economy (40 percent more of a reason to support Harris – 52 percent more of a reason to support Trump) and a 13-point advantage on the level of inflation (52 percent) than more of a reason to support Harris (39 percent). Among “swing voters” — those who did not rule out voting for Trump or Harris from the start of the campaign, and whom Trump won by 8 points — Trump held a 39-point advantage on the level of inflation being more of a reason to support him (23 percent more of a reason to support Harris – 62 percent more of a reason to support Trump) and a 37-point advantage on the state of the national economy being more of a reason to support him (24 percent more of a reason to support Harris – 61 percent more of a reason to support Trump).
However, while Trump held advantages on these macroeconomic dimensions, Harris held advantages on a number of other dimensions related to people’s personal economic experiences when it comes to health care, looking out for the middle class, and taxes.

2024 Post-Election Survey: The Reasons for Voting for Trump and Harris | Navigator​

Report on voters' top reasons for supporting Donald Trump or Kamala Harris, including perceptions of how each candidate prioritized issues.

navigatorresearch.org

YOU LOST THE ELECTION
GET THE FUCK OVER IT

 

[SeaMajor7]

Welcome to my ignore list. You make 54.

PATHETIC COWARD LOSER

 

[Billiejeens]

Welcome to my ignore list. You make 54.

The echo chamber is all that Berg knows.

He must maintain that safe space.

 

[Billiejeens]

PATHETIC COWARD LOSER

He brags about it.

Weird.

 

[Hollie]

Remember when Garland was praised by some Repubs as being a great choice for the SC? Why not pick someone with impeccable credentials who has bipartisan support like Biden did?

Remember when Garland was not just another leftist hack who abandoned any sense of integrity?

 

[Billiejeens]

“For too long, the partisan Department of Justice has been weaponized against me and other Republicans — Not anymore,” Trump said in a post to Truth Social. “Pam will refocus the DOJ to its intended purpose of fighting Crime, and Making America Safe Again.”

Loading…

www.cnbc.com

Not a good look when her nomination is founded on the same lie trump has been telling since the investigations in to his crimes began.

There were literally no crimes.

 

[Billiejeens]

Remember when Garland was praised by some Repubs as being a great choice for the SC? Why not pick someone with impeccable credentials who has bipartisan support like Biden did?

No

No one remembers that.

 

[hadit]

The more they are able to get things done the more dangerous they are.

Let's see if we have this straight. You oppose any and every pick he's going to make so we can safely ignore what you have to say. Got it.

He could appoint Obama to a post and you'd complain about it.

 

[berg80]

Remember when Garland was not just another leftist hack who abandoned any sense of integrity?

Garland cruises through confirmation hearing as GOP support solidifies​

President Joe Biden’s pick to lead the Justice Department, D.C. Circuit Judge Merrick Garland, appears to be coasting towards easy confirmation after a relatively low-key outing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday.

Republicans did use the opportunity to gingerly push Garland to commit to allowing federal prosecutors to press on with politically sensitive investigations into the Department of Justice probe of Donald Trump’s ties to Russia and into the business affairs of Biden’s son, Hunter.

Loading…

www.politico.com

Which he did. In contrast, trump is about to end cases involving his criminal behavior documented in the indictments.

 

[odanny]

So another unqualified bootlicking toady has been nominated for a key position?

Wow, I'm shocked, I really am.

 

[odanny]

YOU LOST THE ELECTION
GET THE FUCK OVER IT

Don't scream, remember your blood pressure.

 

[Rawley]

Pam is not an uniquely unqualified, moral degenerate so a step in the right direction. But her primary qualification has nothing to do with whether she'd work on behalf of the American people. It's her willingness to work on behalf of the soon to be Felon-in-Chief.

So 20 years as a prosecutor isn't a primary qualification? Your cackling candidate touted her time as a prosecutor literally every time she spoke.

 

[Rawley]

He just needs to find someone malleable enough to carry them out. Someone who didn't join the real estate school fraud case for a $25K campaign contribution no doubt seems perfect.

Uh, perhaps because there was one complaint in the state in the three years before the campaign contribution?