Reallly?
Let's try one for example, shall we?
Let's make it pertinent to this Thread as well.
You see, they make you CITE your SOurces in Wiki...
http ://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_election_recount (take out the spaces after the http, I can't post a link right now)
The media reported the results of the study during the week after November 12, 2001. The results of the study showed that had the limited county by county recounts requested by the Gore team been completed, Bush would still have been the winner of the election.
The Florida Supreme Court had ordered "counting of the legal votes contained within the undervotes in all counties where the undervote has not been subjected to a manual tabulation." The U.S. Supreme Court overruled the Florida Supreme Court and stopped their recount via an unsigned "per curiam" opinion in Bush v. Gore, with three Justices (Rehnquist joined by Scalia and Thomas) concurring in a separate opinion. Four Justices (Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer) each wrote their own opinion with various combinations of the other three joining.[3]
=========================
Please feel free to read the cited material and make note of any inaccuracies you may find.
Also please note the Citation of Sources at the bottom.