15 Aug 2014: Allen West: "Barack Hussein Obama is an Islamist"

Last edited:
Yes. I'd be interested in knowing what the percentage is of military who disagree with the decision. It's clearly political to appease Muslims.

:lol: Of course...the "muslims" paid attention to the retirement of one O-5 back in the States. :lol: Listen to you.

Yeah, listen to me. Be sure to point out something you disagree with in this link.
NO COURT MARTIAL FOR LTC WEST

What makes you think LtCol West's situation would have been important to ANYONE if he had not run for Congress afterwards? You and I and everyone never would have even noticed.

So....explain the politics in that.
 
why wasn't this started in the conspiracy theory sub-forum. I personally would be happier if 44 were an atheist.
 
:lol: Of course...the "muslims" paid attention to the retirement of one O-5 back in the States. :lol: Listen to you.

Yeah, listen to me. Be sure to point out something you disagree with in this link.
NO COURT MARTIAL FOR LTC WEST

What makes you think LtCol West's situation would have been important to ANYONE if he had not run for Congress afterwards? You and I and everyone never would have even noticed.

So....explain the politics in that.

Iknowright?

lessee, you served, I served. Did the rw stoner- ibentoken serve?
 
:lol: Of course...the "muslims" paid attention to the retirement of one O-5 back in the States. :lol: Listen to you.

Yeah, listen to me. Be sure to point out something you disagree with in this link.
NO COURT MARTIAL FOR LTC WEST

What makes you think LtCol West's situation would have been important to ANYONE if he had not run for Congress afterwards? You and I and everyone never would have even noticed.

So....explain the politics in that.

You're confused. I said the political decision to appease Muslims. The policy of not waterboarding is also a political decision. Do you think Washington was right to shoot soldiers who disobey?
 
Last edited:
15 Aug 2014: Allen West: "Barack Hussein Obama is an Islamist"

Friday, 15 Aug 2014 10:02 AM
By Melanie Batley

President Barack Obama is an Islamist who is intentionally working against the security of the United States, said former Florida Rep. Allen West.

"The only plausible explanation for many actions taken by President Obama and his administration is that they are working counter to the security of the United States of America," the retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel wrote in a post on his website on Wednesday.

West cited the president's decision to release five senior Taliban members in the exchange for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl; supplying weapons to support the Egyptian government led by the Muslim Brotherhood; and negotiating with Hamas.

He also criticized Obama's decision to suspend a ban on Libyans attending U.S. flight schools and studying nuclear science, which had been in place since 1983.

"Can anyone explain what the strategy and objective is here in lifting this ban with a nation that is or should be on the terrorist watch list?" West wrote.

"Sorry, but I can only explain this one way: Barack Hussein Obama is an Islamist in his foreign policy perspectives and supports their cause."

He added, "The pivot away from the Middle East seems to be nothing more than an opportunity to enable Islamists and their goals. Anyone supporting this Libyan ban being lifted is indeed an enemy of this state."

Allen West: Obama Is an Islamist

Col. West is no extremist or RW kook.

The liberals don't seem to care.

Obama has done way more for the radical Islamists than he has for Americans. Not just freeing the terrorists for no good reason. He has armed the Muslim Brotherhood with some sophisticated military equipment, jets, tanks and a billion dollars.

While the radical Muslims carry on their mission to rid the world of infidels using F-16s, assault weapons and other goodies provided by their good friend, American citizens are being criticized for owning guns.

While Obama says he can kill any American citizen if he thinks they are guilty without benefit of a trial or any rights, he goes to great lengths to ensure that scumbag terrorists who murder in the name of religion are bought here and allowed all rights guaranteed to American citizens. However, he could care less about the Marine being held in Mexico.

Actions speak louder than words. His actions rarely match his words.
 
Yeah, listen to me. Be sure to point out something you disagree with in this link.
NO COURT MARTIAL FOR LTC WEST

What makes you think LtCol West's situation would have been important to ANYONE if he had not run for Congress afterwards? You and I and everyone never would have even noticed.

So....explain the politics in that.

Iknowright?

lessee, you served, I served. Did the rw stoner- ibentoken serve?

You served? What's your opinion of West?
 
Yeah, listen to me. Be sure to point out something you disagree with in this link.
NO COURT MARTIAL FOR LTC WEST

What makes you think LtCol West's situation would have been important to ANYONE if he had not run for Congress afterwards? You and I and everyone never would have even noticed.

So....explain the politics in that.

You're confused. I said the political decision to appease Muslims. The policy of not waterboarding is also a political decision. Do you think Washington was right to shoot soldiers who disobey?
I'm a traditionalist on water-boarding. We used to hang people for that. Let's be traditional...
 
Yeah, listen to me. Be sure to point out something you disagree with in this link.
NO COURT MARTIAL FOR LTC WEST

What makes you think LtCol West's situation would have been important to ANYONE if he had not run for Congress afterwards? You and I and everyone never would have even noticed.

So....explain the politics in that.

You're confused. I said the political decision to appease Muslims. The policy of not waterboarding is also a political decision. Do you think Washington was right to shoot soldiers who disobey?
Why would they give a hoot about what happens to one Lt.Col in the States? And, lets assume for a moment that the Muslims wanted to be appeased....letting this guy retire with pay as opposed to court martialling him....what kind of "appeasement" is that? You tell me.
 
What makes you think LtCol West's situation would have been important to ANYONE if he had not run for Congress afterwards? You and I and everyone never would have even noticed.

So....explain the politics in that.

Iknowright?

lessee, you served, I served. Did the rw stoner- ibentoken serve?

You served? What's your opinion of West?

He's a wannabee hero who's a loony. He has an inflated image of himself being right, damn the rules, the ROE, and everyone else. He's trying to stay relevant by saying nutso stuff.
 
What makes you think LtCol West's situation would have been important to ANYONE if he had not run for Congress afterwards? You and I and everyone never would have even noticed.

So....explain the politics in that.

You're confused. I said the political decision to appease Muslims. The policy of not waterboarding is also a political decision. Do you think Washington was right to shoot soldiers who disobey?
Why would they give a hoot about what happens to one Lt.Col in the States? And, lets assume for a moment that the Muslims wanted to be appeased....letting this guy retire with pay as opposed to court martialling him....what kind of "appeasement" is that? You tell me.

Why can't you answer the question? Was Washington right to shoot his soldiers who disobeyed?
 
15th post
Iknowright?

lessee, you served, I served. Did the rw stoner- ibentoken serve?

You served? What's your opinion of West?

He's a wannabee hero who's a loony. He has an inflated image of himself being right, damn the rules, the ROE, and everyone else. He's trying to stay relevant by saying nutso stuff.

The terrorist talked and American lives were saved, and then he voluntarily turned himself over. Washington shot soldiers who disobeyed. Do you think Washington would have shot West for what he did?
 
he violated the UCMJ. Who is to know what article he'd violate next if they let him off the hook. The military is based on rules & regs but I don't suspect that young 'un- Ibentoken to understand that.
 
he violated the UCMJ. Who is to know what article he'd violate next if they let him off the hook. The military is based on rules & regs but I don't suspect that young 'un- Ibentoken to understand that.

He saved American lives. What's more important to you, regulations or saving American lives?
 
West probably cried during his Article 15 hearing and told them it was a "high tech lynching" and they took pity on him. West was facing up to 11 years in prison.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom