1,600-plus Scientists Say Climate "Emergency" Is a Myth

Yes, we have to parrot science. None of us are experts and you shouldn't be pretending to be one.
Academic Eunuchs

Greenie scientists are nerdy social rejects desperate to belong to a group that will feed their escapist nerd fantasies about being comic-book superheroes out to save the world from those unenlightened practical people.
 
Alright, let's go down the list.

Physicist, Physicist, Engineer that worked for Shell, OK, done here.

Oh, so just because an engineer works for Shell, suddenly his expertise doesn't count? How about all the other experts on the list?

And how about we talk about all the doom-and-gloom predictions made by alarmist climate scientists in the 1990s and early 2000s that failed to materialize? Huh?

I remember when green extremist Governor Jay Inslee of Washington repeatedly said during the 2016 Dem presidential primary that we only had 10 years left unless we took drastic action. How's that working out?
 
Why do you want "the government buying fuel for poor people?"
Oh, you're just trolling again. Never mind.

Here's an old one. The current ratios are probably similar.

1693431348791.png


4 to 1, consumption versus production.
 
Cool. A group of people with much less climate knowledge that I have is talking out of their butts for political reasons. Nobody cares.

The rational people talk about the science. The political-driven crazies rave about their various conspiracies. That's because, since all of the science directly contradicts them, they can't talk about the science.

Go on, deniers. Scream some more about socialism. Go down the list of your cult's talking points. That'll show 'em how rational you are.

I do agree, follow the money. All of the corrupting bribe money flows to denier scammers, thus all of the fraud and garbage pseudoscience comes form the denier side. No "scientist" embraces something as reality-defying as denialism unless they're getting paid to do so.

Did you read the part where it says the declaration does not deny the harmful effects of GHG's ?

No. You didn't. Because if you did and still posted your baloney, we'd go from suspecting you were a moron to knowing it for sure.
 
And he sucks hard at climate science. I'm much, much better at it than he is.

Remember, you can't gaslight people who aren't cult fuktards. You're essentially telling me to believe that 2+2=5 because some important names said so.

The only thing you seem to be good at is making a fool of yourself.
 
Over 1,600 scientists, including two Nobel Peace Prize winners, have signed a declaration that says that the claim of a climate "emergency" is a myth.

More than 1,600 scientists, including two Nobel laureates, declare climate 'emergency' a myth

EXCERPT:

A coalition of 1,609 scientists from around the world have signed a declaration stating “there is no climate emergency” and that they “strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy” being pushed across the globe. The declaration does not deny the harmful effect of greenhouse gasses, but instead challenges the hysteria brought about by the narrative of imminent doom. . . .

“Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures,” the declaration says.
I hear the oil industry pays handsomely for those endorsements, too.
 
This topic is a tired retread of piss poor quality:
 
This topic is a tired retread of piss poor quality:

The intellectual laziness of that argument rates a 10.
 
Cool. A group of people with much less climate knowledge that I have is talking out of their butts for political reasons. Nobody cares.

The rational people talk about the science. The political-driven crazies rave about their various conspiracies. That's because, since all of the science directly contradicts them, they can't talk about the science.

Go on, deniers. Scream some more about socialism. Go down the list of your cult's talking points. That'll show 'em how rational you are.

I do agree, follow the money. All of the corrupting bribe money flows to denier scammers, thus all of the fraud and garbage pseudoscience comes form the denier side. No "scientist" embraces something as reality-defying as denialism unless they're getting paid to do so.
While the atmospheric heat was in some measure arguable....the gargantuan mass of heat energy required to change ocean temps even slightly....is not. Whether we can effect change by CO2 mitigation remains to be seen and is certainly not guaranteed. But the oceans cannot be ignored...if the ocean is heating that quickly we have a real problem and I don't think we have any way of estimating the potential exponential aggregate going forward.
 
Yes, we have to parrot science. None of us are experts and you shouldn't be pretending to be one.


As is always the case, a PARROT doesn't believe anyone thinks, because as a PARROT he never thinks, he just PARROTS, and assumes SO DOES EVERYONE ELSE.....


Care to explain why homO went silent 2010 to 2012. The Co2 FRAUD was the greatest threat, then for two years.... NOTHING.... and then in 2012 it was back to being the greatest threat.... to everything except.... BEACHFRONT PROPERTY on Martha's Vineyard, last hit by Cat 5 gusts in .... 1938...


 
This topic is a tired retread of piss poor quality:
This fact check puts the "climate declaration" precisely where it belongs: In the trash.
 

Forum List

Back
Top