$1.5 Million in Cash in Crooks' 3 Overseas Encrypted Bank Accounts - FBI involvement ?

[PeterPilot]

How so?

They were also "assets" of the FBI. The mother of the boys pointed that out. Most likely that interview with her side of the story was not published on mainstream media. One or both of them had been in regular contact with the FBI

 

[Skylar]

I can tell you that 20 year old Thomas Crooks did not make $1.5 Million working as busboy in a nursing home. Somebody got that money to him for doing something very drastic. Hey, what a coincidence. He just got shot dead for trying to assassinate President Trump.

Further fueling speculations that Crooks did not act alone, and was paid to shoot Trump, is that Crooks used encrypted messaging applications. What 20 year old kid does that ? And for what reason ?

Adding to this is that an unidentified person who visited an FBI office in Washington DC, also frequently visited Crooks' home before the shooting.

Interesting also is that an Iranian plot to assassinate Trump was uncovered just weeks before the shooting. Was one of these international encrypted accounts money from Iran ? And the Secret Service knew about this Iranian plot yet chose to turn down requests for additional Secret Service protection.

There is a list of discrepancies that exist pertaining to Trump's protection, or glaring lack of it (see video 1:45 - 7:05) serious questions have been rased about the FBI's internal processes, as well as their ability (or willingness) to handle their assigned duties. Congressional hearings have been held and scheduled to investigate the FBI & Secret Service,.

The big question. Could Crooks have been working for the FBI, as his parents claim he was ? If it is determined that this is the case, then the ramifications would be huge, as the FBI is headed by Christopher Wray, and governed by the DOJ, headed by Merritt Garland and Joe Biden.

Also interesting are some things emanating from the Congress. Democrat congressman Bennie Thompson proposed a bill to strip Secret Service protection from convicted felons (which would have technically included Trump) leading some observers to believe that the assassination attempt was planned by Democrats.

Jacqueline Marsaw, of Bennie Thompson's staff posted on Facebook >> "I don't condone violence, but please get you some shooting lessons, so you don't miss next time. oops, that wasn't me talking."

Well, yes it was her talking, and within her glaring mutilation of English grammar, was a clear "condone" and advocacy of violence, and cold-blooded murder.

Looking at the series of events (again watch the video) it is apparent that the Secret Service was not providing good quality of protection, whether from incompetence of deliberate. In the end, it is better to keep on having more questions than settling for easy answers.

What is the evidence that there is 1.5 million in an account for Crooks?

I've heard the claim repeated in little circle jerks by far right bloggers, citing each other, but never seen the actual evidence of it.

Anyone care to share? Or is this just echo-chamber fodder that we're expected to nod and grin with, never asking to see any actual evidence?

 

[protectionist]

Of course the whole incident was Faked .
It's just that poorly educated westerners in particular are not taught how to spot Fake News or think Critically .

Consider the likelihood that Crooks was not killed but is a full time CIA / FBI asset and completely off- grid for future work .
If ( If) any shooter was actually killed ( as distinct from being told that one was ) are you aware of Crook's double and he has been named ?

Clearly it is very murky but the one sure thing is that nobody took a pot shot at The Donald and he was intimately involved in the escapade .

Too much Twilight Zone.

 

[protectionist]

Are you a hitman because you have a rifle badge? I'm telling you a real hitman that is worth paying 1.5 milllion would have put him down and probably have not gotten caught.

You're telling me wrong. And what's YOUR background ? - in the business of doing hits ?

 

[protectionist]

What is the evidence that there is 1.5 million in an account for Crooks?

I've heard the claim repeated in little circle jerks by far right bloggers, citing each other, but never seen the actual evidence of it.

Anyone care to share? Or is this just echo-chamber fodder that we're expected to nod and grin with, never asking to see any actual evidence?

I posted the source of it (being the FBI & Congress)
Do you read threads before posting in them ?

 

[protectionist]

Not watching your stupid video. Any sniper worth $1.5M wouldn't have missed that easy shot.

He didn't miss. Trump turned his head.

 

[Skylar]

I posted the source of it (being the FBI & Congress)
Do you read threads before posting in them ?

I've looked through your OP. There's not a single link to the FBI or Congress confirming that Crooks had a foreign bank account with 1.5 million dollars in it.

In fact, the extent of your mention of it is this:

"I can tell you that 20 year old Thomas Crooks did not make $1.5 Million working as busboy in a nursing home."

So where is your evidence that there actually foreign accounts owned by Crook that had $1.5 milllion in it? Somewhere other than the OP? Or is your 'evidence', you merely typing out the accusation?

 

[Skylar]

Interesting thing about conspiracy speculations, They are BASED in FACTS, and often turn out to be TRUE.

The interesting thing about conspiracy speculation is that they are rarely based on facts. And almost always turn out to be speculative nonsense.

You've merely been conditioned to believe that your 'emotional truth' is evidence - something FEELING true even when the evidence doesn't support it.

 

[Skylar]

The FBI "debunked" nothing. If they were in cahoots with Crooks, the Iranians, or whomever, you think they're going to just stand right up and say "Yup! It was us."

Florida congressman Mike Walz of the House Armed Services Committee, said that he was briefed by the FBI, and that was the source of the information regarding the 3 overseas encrypted accounts.

So if you have some information on this, beyond a flimsy "spokesperson" source, which is no source at all, come back and let us know. In the meantime, we have a US Congressman on the record, that the FBI has stated that there were 3 encrypted overseas accounts, and you can bet they didn't go through all that for $100.

Trump shooter had ‘3 encrypted overseas accounts’

Trump shooter had ‘3 encrypted overseas accounts’ and two cellphones, according to a Republican representative.

finbold.com

And where does it say that there are 1.5 million dollars in the '3 encrypted overseas accounts'? Let alone provide evidence to back the claim?

Where are you guys getting this shit? Its certainly not the FBI. They've never confirmed any such claim. So who?

This is looking more and more like a right-wing blog circle jerk.....where someone just made up the accusation, backed by nothing. And was quoted by another blogger. Who was then quoted by a third. Who was then quoted by the first guy.

Where is the actual evidence of the 1.5 million dollars in 3 encrypted overseas accounts belonging to Thomas Matthew Crooks? Not the claim, but the evidence.

 

[Skylar]

Its been 6 hours. Anyone ever manage to find evidence of that "$1.5 million dollars in 3 encrypted overseas accounts?"

 

[protectionist]

I've looked through your OP. There's not a single link to the FBI or Congress confirming that Crooks had a foreign bank account with 1.5 million dollars in it.

In fact, the extent of your mention of it is this:

"I can tell you that 20 year old Thomas Crooks did not make $1.5 Million working as busboy in a nursing home."

So where is your evidence that there actually foreign accounts owned by Crook that had $1.5 milllion in it? Somewhere other than the OP? Or is your 'evidence', you merely typing out the accusation?

WRONG! Maybe you need to get more sleep.
Post # 30. Again, read the thread.

 

[protectionist]

The interesting thing about conspiracy speculation is that they are rarely based on facts. And almost always turn out to be speculative nonsense.

You've merely been conditioned to believe that your 'emotional truth' is evidence - something FEELING true even when the evidence doesn't support it.

WRONG! They often turn out to be true.
Your problem is you think (or pretend) there isnt any evidence, even after it has been posted in the thread.

 

[protectionist]

And where does it say that there are 1.5 million dollars in the '3 encrypted overseas accounts'? Let alone provide evidence to back the claim?

Where are you guys getting this shit? Its certainly not the FBI. They've never confirmed any such claim. So who?

This is looking more and more like a right-wing blog circle jerk.....where someone just made up the accusation, backed by nothing. And was quoted by another blogger. Who was then quoted by a third. Who was then quoted by the first guy.

Where is the actual evidence of the 1.5 million dollars in 3 encrypted overseas accounts belonging to Thomas Matthew Crooks? Not the claim, but the evidence.

So you say the FB has "never confirmed any such claim". Uh huh.

On the other hand, a US congressman (Mike Walz of the House Armed Services Committee), said that he was briefed by the FBI, and that was the source of the information regarding the 3 overseas encrypted accounts.

No offense, but 'll go with the US Congressman over your blind hunch.

 

[protectionist]

Its been 6 hours. Anyone ever manage to find evidence of that "$1.5 million dollars in 3 encrypted overseas accounts?"

It's been 6 DAYS (+ 3 hours) since evidence of that "$1.5 million dollars in 3 encrypted overseas accounts, was posted in Post # 30.

 

[candycorn]

So someone hired Crooks and paid him up front 1.5 million dollars to murder Trump? It seems they got taken, should have hired a proven hit man and not someone that couldn't hit the side of a barn. I think your high rent is clogging your thoughts.

Nice. He’s definitely missing a few brain cells.

 

[Skylar]

It's been 6 DAYS (+ 3 hours) since evidence of that "$1.5 million dollars in 3 encrypted overseas accounts, was posted in Post # 30.

So your 'evidence', is Matt Waltz saying there are 3 encrypted accounts. Backed by nothing.

And no mention whatsoever of supposed '1.5 million dollars'.

The only one in the OP or post 30 making any claims about 1.5 million dolllars.....is you. Citing you.

And you're a conspiracy nutbar, who routinely makes shit up.

 

[Skylar]

WRONG! Maybe you need to get more sleep.
Post # 30. Again, read the thread.

Nope. You do this shit constantly. You make up nonsense. You back that nonsense with nothing.

When challenged to show us evidence for the dipshittery you made up, you reference a post that doesn't back it. Just like you're doing now.

Post 30 has jackshit to back the claim of $1.5 million. And the '3 encrypted accounts', Matt is crystal clear that they are trying to get into the accounts. Which means they don't know what's in them. Laughably obliterating your entire fantasy of $1.5 million.

Matt speculates about Iran being connected to the attack. Backed with nothing. He provides no evidence. Nor does he claim to be citing FBI. Or anyone else.

You simply lack critical thinking skills, being incapable of discerning the difference between evidence and any random speculation, speculation, or made up nonsense. To you, they're the same thing.

 

[protectionist]

So your 'evidence', is Matt Waltz saying there are 3 encrypted accounts. Backed by nothing.

And no mention whatsoever of supposed '1.5 million dollars'.

The only one in the OP or post 30 making any claims about 1.5 million dolllars.....is you. Citing you.

And you're a conspiracy nutbar, who routinely makes shit up.

Backed by the FBI, and Waltz is a member of the US House of Reps, not an unnamed "spokesperson", and he did mention 1.5 million $.

0.04 - " the agents are pissed, theyre frustrated - maybe you thought he was alking about travel agents, huh ? Acapulco anyone ?

0:33 - "the agents are going to hold her to account" (FBI of course)

Who gave the Stand Down Order? That's all I want to know. Inside job - no brainer.

PS- the OP has 11 positive ratings who apparently don't agree about "conspiracy nutbar, who routinely makes shit up"
Looks more like you are a biased Biden administration supporter, in favor of a cover-up.

 

[protectionist]

With the litany of discepancies, all pointing to an obvious inside job, never has the American peoples' collective intelligence been so insulted as when on the evening of July 13, (way before anyone could have had enough information to be able to conclude this), the local Pa. FBI Special Agent in Charge announced, on national TV: "WE BELIEVE THE SHOOTER ACTED ALONE. "

 

[Skylar]

Backed by the FBI, and Waltz is a member of the US House of Reps, not an unnamed "spokesperson", and he did mention 1.5 million $.

Nope. The FBI never said a thing about 1.5 million dollar anything.

Waltz was very clear that they were trying to get into the 'encrypted accounts overseas'. How then could they know what was in them....if they were trying to get in?

You're a terrible liar. You're awful at it.

0.04 - " the agents are pissed, theyre frustrated - maybe you thought he was alking about travel agents, huh ? Acapulco anyone ?

Oh, transcripts? You want to play with transcripts. Sure. Point out where Waltz cites anything about $1.5 million dollars in any account.


Waltz: "I just talked to one of the agents a few hours ago. I talked to some Sunday. The agents are pissed. They’re frustrated. They’ve repeatedly asked for resources. Donald Trump isn’t your normal average former president. He’s not Jimmy Carter sitting in the old folks home. And oh by the way, some other things are coming out. Like, the shooter had 3 encrypted accounts overseas at the same time we’re having an Iranian plot. I think is going to much broader, much deeper. But the agents are going to hold her to account. It’s their lives on the lines. And she was not giving them the resources they were requesting."

"That Pittsburgh field office is responsible for the advance. That was clearly not done appropriately and distracted by Dr. Jill. "

Watters: "And the Pittsburgh field office was also responsible for covering up that bribery Ukraine tip that came in as well. Are you saying the you’re getting information that says there are encrypted communication between crooks and foreign sources."

Waltz: "No, what we know, and this was on the briefing we just received, he had three encrypted overseas accounts that the FBI is trying to get into."

Watters: "What do you mean by overseas accounts."

Waltz: "Well we know that they were based on servers overseas. And so you’re gotta work over there with the FBI liaisons overseas to start getting into ‘em, with their authorities."

Watters: "Do you think this attempt on the former president’s life has some sort of foreign nexus."

Waltz: "Well we know that the Iranian have been trying for years not only him, but everyone, Pompeo and others involved in the Soleimani strike and we also know and its finally come out, many of us have been fighting this for years. That they pulled national security advisor O’Brien’s detail, completely away. He’s had to go to his own private security and local law enforcement. So there is all kinds of issues here, and we’re going to get to the bottom of it starting on Monday when she comes before the House."

Watters: I’m just not so sure I believe everything that I’m being told about what’s inside his phone yet. I just don’t trust the people doing this investigation.


So Protectionist....buddy. That's a transcript of your entire video in post 30. You know, the post where you insisted the evidence for your '1.5 million' bullshit was located.

Can you just highlight the part about the $1.5 million dollars? Maybe a nice bold?

Nothing, huh? Considering how much of your arguments are based on lies, I would have thought you'd be better at lying. But nope, you just make shit up. And a terrible, incompetent, embarrassing liar.

Laughing....you fucking hack.

0:33 - "the agents are going to hold her to account" (FBI of course)

Who gave the Stand Down Order? That's all I want to know. Inside job - no brainer.

What 'stand down order', hack? You this you citing 4chan again?

Maybe if you count the number of upvotes on your lies, they'll magically combined to become an actual source.