judicial branch

  1. P@triot

    Democrats refuse to accept that elections have consequences

    They loved that phrase when Barack Insane Obama sat in the Oval Office. But after the American people spoke, and elected President Trump, the Democrats have refused to accept the results of the election or the voice of the people. Elections have consequences, Democrats. MaObama smugly declared...
  2. P@triot

    The unimaginable ignorance regarding U.S. government

    The left still hasn’t figured out that the federal government has three distinctive branches and that all three have vastly different responsibilities. The left truly believes that the President of the United States “controls” the nation much like Saddam Hussein did in Iraq or Fidel Castro did...
  3. anotherlife

    Sovereignty, who is your sovereign?

    To have a judicial branch, you need sovereignty. But who can provide it? A 200 years ago, it was kings that provided it, and everyone knew the name of his king. Who provides sovereignty in the 21st century? Is it money, that is the banks? If yes, then is it an automatic system with its own...

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top