Youtube Being Censored, We Can't Question the Government on Youtube

[Pumpkin Row]

There's no hurry on figuring out those dates. I understand it may take some research. Especially with blinders on.

Perhaps a visual aid will help. Note the years listed on the bottom axis:

​

Oh look --- there's one of the dates I mentioned right there on the chart. That's a clue for ya.

So are these numbers "fake"?

See that spike at the right edge of the pink area? The one marked "March 15, 1933 Dow gained 15.34%, largest one-day gain")?

That point would be eleven days after FDR was inaugurated.

Now look at the plunge marked "Great Depression" (the pink area) and essplain to the class how Roosevelt came into office and "brought" that retroactively.

This oughta be a hoot.

FDR's policies prolonged Depression by 7 years, UCLA economists calculate

The Stock Crash is a symptom, not a cause of the Great Depression, so the chart doesn't help your case at all.

How FDR Made the Depression Worse | Robert Higgs

FDR's policies, practically all of them, increased the cost of living and made it harder to do business. He made the Recession we were already experiencing worse in every way.

As I said earlier, combine inability to afford hiring employees with the government forcing your business to hire more employees, and your economy is destroyed. In this particular case, your economy is plunged into a Depression and then dragged through it for many years.

Are you seriously claiming the period from 1929 through 1933 was a recession and not a depression? Kind of goofy since you also claim the crash of '29 was a "symptom" of the Grear Depression but call it a recession in '33.

The beginning of "the Great Depression" was a recession, which only became a Depression when FDR decided to screw things up more. Don't hurt yourself too much pretending to think about it.

Your post and claim is complete bullcrap only an uneducated fool could make. When FDR was inaugurated into the Presidency unemployment was over 30% and hundreds of banks had gone broke and closed their doors leaving funds unavailable and lost to depositors. What kind of jerk would call that a recession? In other words, the banks being broke prevented people from getting their cash out of the bank. Referring to 1933 USA as being in a recession instead of a depression is jackassery or outright lying.

When FDR took office, he was the one that caused the mass panic that made everything worse by declaring the banking holiday, forcing banks to close their doors for months while the government inspected them all.

I'd also like to point out that it wasn't 30%, it was around 20%.

 

[Valerie]

but Pumpkin girl argues that somehow FDR went back in a time machine and started the Great Depression.

You lie!

Show us where she said that.

YOUR credibility is at stake.

Before FDR took office, what we had was a minor recession, FDR took over and turned it into a Great Depression, then prevented the US from recovering from it for seven years. Had he done literally nothing, actually sat on his hands and signed no bills, implemented no policies, etc, the Great Depression would have ended during his first term.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

The last time I bothered replying to your economically illiterate ass was in a thread regarding FDR.

Still waiting for you to have the balls to try to stand up to your claims:
a) That I am a socialist
b) That I don't understand economics or business or
c) That you do.

Because as I pointed out before- so far all you are doing is pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold.

Or you can just admit you were lying.

I already did. You cut off, like, most of my post. If you're going to be that intellectually dishonest, and THAT obvious about it, replies to you are a waste of time.

You mean I cut off the part where you were pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold?

You called me a socialist- because I disagreed with you- like the majority of economists- regarding FDR.

And that- that is not only intellectually dishonest- it is just down right idiotic.

I called you a socialist because you agree with FDR's policies, which are Socialist and factually did not work, because Socialism does not work. He extended the Great Depression by many years..

Like I said- you called me a socialist because I disagreed with you.

I agree with some of FDR's policies and not with others.

To you that makes me a Socialist.

And you calling me a Socialist makes it clear to you me that you are just another partisan idiot.

Agreeing with FDR's policies makes you a Socialist, yes. I made that much clear already.

 

[Valerie]

I'm homeschooled, 16 is hardly a baby..

okee dokee you have a lot to learn, kid.

 

[MisterBeale]

You can use Vimeo for music videos. I don't know if they have any other types of videos though.

Vimeo is a profit based platform


For politics, it seems to all be going to either Steemit or Bitchute.

What do you mean profit based? Aren't they all profit based? That is why they have ads and sponsors. Anyhow, you can go on Vimeo and search and post videos just like you can on YouTube, I think, and that's really the only thing I use YouTube for. Let's see.

No. Steemit and Bitchute have no ads. They are user supported though Paypal, Patreon and Bitcoin, etc.

 

[MindWars]

SGT Report

 

[Pogo]

I'm homeschooled, 16 is hardly a baby..

okee dokee you have a lot to learn, kid.

Not the least of which appears to be socialization. Especially the part about opening one's mind and acknowledging that one is perhaps not the centre of the universe.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

I'm homeschooled, 16 is hardly a baby..

okee dokee you have a lot to learn, kid.

Not the least of which appears to be socialization. Especially the part about opening one's mind and acknowledging that one is perhaps not the centre of the universe.

I do have a lot to learn... as do the two of you. It's important to acknowledge that or you'll stunt your learning. That's probably why you're stuck where you are, and my opinions have changed through the time I've been here.

 

[MisterBeale]

SGT Report

Thanks for that.

It has been exceedingly difficult to get the truth out because of this crack down.

It all started with this video. The Richie Allen channel is back up, minus this video and several others. It is having a chilling effect.

It's pretty much official, the Deep State has declared war on the American folks. They know that too many are way wide awake after too many false flags.

JoePublic

 

[flacaltenn]

"They tell US at USMB what content we can't allow if we want their ad service."


flacaltenn can you give examples of what you'd like to allow, but are unable to allow, due to restrictions imposed by google..?

Don't want to get into specifics, but SEVERAL of our rules are based on their demands.

Del is close.. But those Russian bride or Hot Russians want to date you ads ---- are DESIGNED for the 2 of us by our "Google preference files" from Google spying. Something the 2 of us have in common... Can't talk about "those days" undercovers in Moscow...

I always thought the ads here were just random. I don't see ads any more because of ad blocker but I used to get ads for things I've never looked at or searched for. All KINDS of weird ads would pop up here, which slows down the site when you are trying to navigate. Life is SO much better without ads!

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I can still fondly remember the days when Conservatives actually cared when Russia tried to harm the United States.

Putin could only DREAM of the damage that YOU partisans have inflicted on this country. He CANNOT and does not want to "pick candidates"... His objective is to take advantage of OUR OWN self-mutilation and confidence destroying..

Just like WE took advantage of the rapid loss of confidence that the folks of the Soviet had in THEIR system. That's what the grudge match is about. We PUSHED THEM -- when they were weak and in turmoil. And NOW -- it's payback time for the loss of Russian glory.

WE are responsible for our own dysfunction. ESPECIALLY the juvenile actions of the tribal warriors in the 2 diseased Brand Name parties..

 

[Damaged Eagle]

It is an attack on free speech, leftard idiots think it's great but they won't when it comes for them too.

Why are you against the free speech of Youtube?

Why are you against capitalism?

Why are you against a business determining how it will run its business?

Does this mean you now believe that bakers can refuse to decorate a cake based on their 1st Amendment rights?

*****SMILE*****

 

[dblack]

It is an attack on free speech, leftard idiots think it's great but they won't when it comes for them too.

Why are you against the free speech of Youtube?

Why are you against capitalism?

Why are you against a business determining how it will run its business?

Does this mean you now believe that bakers can refuse to decorate a cake based on their 1st Amendment rights?

*****SMILE*****

Things that make you go, hmmm....

 

[ptbw forever]

In reality, my exposure to Google is much larger than most. Because my electronic product design biz has suffered thru a NUMBER of Android developments for our customers. Experience with Google micromanaging their development tools and developers convinced me to tell everyone here we're not doing Android ANYTHING ever again. They'd change the rules and tools MONTHLY.. Not giving a damn about developers on their platforms.

THEN -- there's the matter of website advertising. Reason for a LOT of USMB "free speech" restraint is because of Google MONITORING the "quality" of this site and all others that Google serves ads to... They have 80% of the web by the "short and curlies"...

While THEY index porn, violence, and all KINDS of offensive material -- they DENY the rights of ad clients...

Slow down.

You are going WAY over the Democrat posters’ heads with this stuff.

The same retards who believe it is somehow illegal for Christian private companies to deny service to gays and have now forced the Christian companies to appeal to the Supreme Court now want to claim google is a private company that can do what it wants.

The same dipshits who claim to hate monopolies and claim to support anti-trust laws support the biggest monopolies in human history.

WAY over their heads.

Slow down.

You are going way over the head of Republican posters heads with this stuff.

The same retards who think that Christian private companies don't have to follow the law when it comes to gays now want to claim that Google and Youtube are violating "Free Speech" and shouldn't be able to censor their own content.....

The same dipshits who claim to be for business's being able to do as they please until of course....well they 'censor' their loony Konspiracy Klaims.

Way over their heads.

You are the one promoting the double standard, dipshit.

If Google can do whatever the hell it wants because it is a private company, then EVERY private company has the same right.

You also failed to counter my point about monopolies. Google is the biggest monopoly in human history.

 

[MindWars]

"They tell US at USMB what content we can't allow if we want their ad service."


flacaltenn can you give examples of what you'd like to allow, but are unable to allow, due to restrictions imposed by google..?

Don't want to get into specifics, but SEVERAL of our rules are based on their demands.

Del is close.. But those Russian bride or Hot Russians want to date you ads ---- are DESIGNED for the 2 of us by our "Google preference files" from Google spying. Something the 2 of us have in common... Can't talk about "those days" undercovers in Moscow...

I always thought the ads here were just random. I don't see ads any more because of ad blocker but I used to get ads for things I've never looked at or searched for. All KINDS of weird ads would pop up here, which slows down the site when you are trying to navigate. Life is SO much better without ads!

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I can still fondly remember the days when Conservatives actually cared when Russia tried to harm the United States.

Putin could only DREAM of the damage that YOU partisans have inflicted on this country. He CANNOT and does not want to "pick candidates"... His objective is to take advantage of OUR OWN self-mutilation and confidence destroying..

Just like WE took advantage of the rapid loss of confidence that the folks of the Soviet had in THEIR system. That's what the grudge match is about. We PUSHED THEM -- when they were weak and in turmoil. And NOW -- it's payback time for the loss of Russian glory.

WE are responsible for our own dysfunction. ESPECIALLY the juvenile actions of the tribal warriors in the 2 diseased Brand Name parties..

What you said " juvenile actions............."

 

[del]

"They tell US at USMB what content we can't allow if we want their ad service."


flacaltenn can you give examples of what you'd like to allow, but are unable to allow, due to restrictions imposed by google..?

Don't want to get into specifics, but SEVERAL of our rules are based on their demands.

Del is close.. But those Russian bride or Hot Russians want to date you ads ---- are DESIGNED for the 2 of us by our "Google preference files" from Google spying. Something the 2 of us have in common... Can't talk about "those days" undercovers in Moscow...

I always thought the ads here were just random. I don't see ads any more because of ad blocker but I used to get ads for things I've never looked at or searched for. All KINDS of weird ads would pop up here, which slows down the site when you are trying to navigate. Life is SO much better without ads!

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I can still fondly remember the days when Conservatives actually cared when Russia tried to harm the United States.

Really though? Fondly? I doubt you've ever felt that way towards a conservative for any reason. Lol. And if it WAS conservatives saying such things, you would laugh it off and call them paranoid. Let's be honest.

if you spoke english, you'd know that fondly is modifying days in that sentence, not conservatives.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Go tell that to the Dem minority in Congress. They think $30,000 of Russian Troll ads is a freaking national crisis.

I'm quite sure that Russian ads and trolls didn't influence the outcome of the election, regardless of what the dems claim.

You mean regardless what the content of this and similar message boards claim?

"Three million Amish mobilize to vote for Rump" --- read that here.
"Hillary a no-show at rally, replaced by hologram" --- read that here.
"Hillary has Parkinson's" --- read that here.
"Hillary has dementia" --- read that here.
"Hillary has cancer" --- read that here.
"Clintons kill FBI agent" --- read that here.
"Bill Clinton's secret black son" --- read that here.

Etc etc etc etc etc.....

This is not really anything different than what our candidates say about one another OR anything that was or is said about Trump.

I must say I've watched a lot of political campaigns and have yet to see anything like a candy claiming "my opponent didn't show up and was replaced by a hologram".

Well, I heard nothing about that, and I can tell you that no Russians or Pogos can influence me or my decisions when it comes to important elections.

Pogos could influence me, whatever they want, it seems I impulsively want the opposite. Unless it's music.

 

[Dale Smith]

“Youtube Being Censored”

By whom?

YouTube refusing to host rightwing lies and hate isn’t ‘censorship.’

“We Can't Question the Government on Youtube”

It’s neither the role nor responsibility of YouTube to accommodate those who wish to question government – that’s done through the political process and in the courts; the right of the people to question government exists solely between the government and those governed, having nothing to do with private hosting sites.

Now, if government were to enact a law making it illegal for YouTube to host rightwing lies and hate, then you would have a case of actual censorship, and a valid thread topic.

Great job, Clayton........you just proved that you are exactly what I have claimed you are......a good little commie!

Great job Dale.

You just proved you are exactly what we have known all along.

That you are a gaping idiot.

I know more than you.....seems that C_Clayton believes that the SPLC is the arbiter of truth and thus a good judge as to what should stay and what should be removed from Youtube and which channels should be banned. You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

I already did. You cut off, like, most of my post. If you're going to be that intellectually dishonest, and THAT obvious about it, replies to you are a waste of time.

You mean I cut off the part where you were pulling crap out of your ass and calling it gold?

You called me a socialist- because I disagreed with you- like the majority of economists- regarding FDR.

And that- that is not only intellectually dishonest- it is just down right idiotic.

'Economists' is merely an appeal to authority fallacy with no citations to back it up. Only Keynsian economists agree with FDR, and they're frauds.

You cite a total of 2 or 3 economists- that is your appeal to authority fallacy.

Your description of FDR causing the Great Depression is just your appeal to idiocy.

You asked her and she provided the links for you.

Yes indeed- she provided 2 links- one to one economist- and one to a paper authoried by 2 economists- I have read them before because we have had this discussion before.

That was his/her/its appeal to authority fallacy.

None of those economists claim that FDR 'caused' the Great Depression- as Pumpkin has claimed- they claim that his policies exacerbated it.

Most economists disagree. There is no way for us to definitively know now- we do know that FDR became President after the Great Depression started- and it was over before he died while still President.

I strongly suggest you read more about the events leading up to FDR's election- the United States was on the verge of anarchy- farmers had already taken action in a few places in the United States shutting down cities due to the crisis. In my opinion- based upon both my reading of history- and based upon the opinions of other economists- FDR both prevented a possible collapse of government in the Midwest- but also ended the Great Depression.

I've seen you post no authoritative links to sources contrary to what she's posted. All I've seen from you is that she's using an 'appeal to authority fallacy'. In my mind that's a progressive version of the appeal to authority fallacy in itself because most of you progressive label things some sort of fallacy to supposedly prove your point. You want to make a point provide us with evidence that refutes the sources that Pumpkin Row is citing instead of relying on your little philosophical fallacy listing in your pathetic attempt to say she's incorrect. Until I see your contradicting evidence I agree with her assessment of how FDR created a depression out of a simple recession.

*****SMILE*****

 

[Dale Smith]

Quite the technology geek, that FDR. Whereas O'bama only time-traveled back four months before he took office to dump the economy thereby ensuring a win, FDR went back four years with his time machine to trash the whole Hoover presidency.

Linear time is now "fake news".

I swear ta god, this board is a competition for top Moron.

Before FDR took office, what we had was a minor recession, FDR took over and turned it into a Great Depression, then prevented the US from recovering from it for seven years. Had he done literally nothing, actually sat on his hands and signed no bills, implemented no policies, etc, the Great Depression would have ended during his first term.

Policy Report: How to Turn a Recession into a Depression
This link explains it decently.(You probably won't read it, but I love you anyway<3)

FDR also basically totaled the economy through his government takeover of businesses, forcing them to lock prices high and forcing them to continue hiring employees despite the lower sales, while also dictating how much they paid said employees. These policies not only crippled businesses, but also promoted monopolies due to lack of competition.

Which of these dates occurred first:

• October 29, 1929
• March 4, 1933

Take all the time you need. Feel free to use Google. I wouldn't trust Bing on this one.

Actually you could probably just open the calendar tray on your computer and scroll back to see which one is more recent. Then it would be the other one.

Not rocket surgery.

Oh while you're in there look up "Hoovervilles". And come back and essplain why they were not called "Rooseveltvilles".

At this point, I'm not even sure you bothered reading my post, let alone the link. I went into detail on exactly why you're confused(On this subject specifically, we don't have all week for me to explain everything else.). Before FDR took office, it was a recession. After he took office, he made it a Great Depression. I even specified which policies it was.

Probably because the people calling them that were just as confused as you are.

There's no hurry on figuring out those dates. I understand it may take some research. Especially with blinders on.

Perhaps a visual aid will help. Note the years listed on the bottom axis:

​

Oh look --- there's one of the dates I mentioned right there on the chart. That's a clue for ya.

So are these numbers "fake"?

See that spike at the right edge of the pink area? The one marked "March 15, 1933 Dow gained 15.34%, largest one-day gain")?

That point would be eleven days after FDR was inaugurated.

Now look at the plunge marked "Great Depression" (the pink area) and essplain to the class how Roosevelt came into office and "brought" that retroactively.

This oughta be a hoot.

Actually, watching you flail away acting like you have ANY understanding of the 1929 Crash, those behind it and the Great Depression is a BIG time hoot to me. FDR was a disgusting POS that sold out America to the international bankers, made us "enemy combatants" by altering the 1917 "Trading With The Enemy" Act and used it to compel Americans to turn in their gold and silver which is REAL money for notes of debt we call Federal Reserve notes and with it, Americans lost allodial rights to property. They also became surety against the debt because he pledged our labor as collateral via the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy of March 1933 and with that came the passing of House Joint Resolution 192. FDR and Woodrow Wilson are THE worst presidents and the sorriest pieces of shit in the history of America because they were complicit in it's downfall. The Crash of 1929 was orchestrated by the very bankers that got Wilson to pass the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 that was suppose to insure that something like the 1929 crash would not be debilitating. They pulled out of the market when it was at it's highest and took their profits and then retracted the money supply by doing a margin call on the Stock Exchange for those that had been taken in by the deal of buying 100 dollars worth of stock for ten dollars down. The margin call caused a run on the banks that didn't have the money in their vaults and as the market crashed, the ones running the Fed rushed in to buy up controlling shares of corporations that they coveted for pennies on the dollar and bought up failed banks not affiliated with the Fed. You don't know shit, Pogo.......you don't know the real history and you spew ignorance. Watching you lamely attempt to run down others is beyond ironic given how little you actually believe you know.

 

[Pogo]

I'm quite sure that Russian ads and trolls didn't influence the outcome of the election, regardless of what the dems claim.

You mean regardless what the content of this and similar message boards claim?

"Three million Amish mobilize to vote for Rump" --- read that here.
"Hillary a no-show at rally, replaced by hologram" --- read that here.
"Hillary has Parkinson's" --- read that here.
"Hillary has dementia" --- read that here.
"Hillary has cancer" --- read that here.
"Clintons kill FBI agent" --- read that here.
"Bill Clinton's secret black son" --- read that here.

Etc etc etc etc etc.....

This is not really anything different than what our candidates say about one another OR anything that was or is said about Trump.

I must say I've watched a lot of political campaigns and have yet to see anything like a candy claiming "my opponent didn't show up and was replaced by a hologram".

Well, I heard nothing about that, and I can tell you that no Russians or Pogos can influence me or my decisions when it comes to important elections.

Pogos could influence me, whatever they want, it seems I impulsively want the opposite. Unless it's music.

Thank your lucky stars that there's only one of me. Ah am yew-neek.