Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone read the article? The judge just said that having a cow and consuming your own milk is a states right thing.
The Federal constitution said nothing about certain foods being protected by the constitution.
So how can strict constitutalionists disagree with this decision?
Especially if they are against the FDA.
Anyone read the article? The judge just said that having a cow and consuming your own milk is a states right thing.
The Federal constitution said nothing about certain foods being protected by the constitution.
So how can strict constitutalionists disagree with this decision?
Especially if they are against the FDA.
OK, A STATES RIGHT THING.
The remedies for oppression are, according to the founders? Hint it is along the same lines as federal thought.
States were not considered any less a threat to liberty then the federal system.
Anyone read the article? The judge just said that having a cow and consuming your own milk is a states right thing.
The Federal constitution said nothing about certain foods being protected by the constitution.
So how can strict constitutalionists disagree with this decision?
Especially if they are against the FDA.
OK, A STATES RIGHT THING.
The remedies for oppression are, according to the founders? Hint it is along the same lines as federal thought.
States were not considered any less a threat to liberty then the federal system.
Sure they can. Duhhh.
This problem and similar ones can exist on all levels of government right down to deed restricted neighborhoods which many are stupid enough to buy into.
OK, A STATES RIGHT THING.
The remedies for oppression are, according to the founders? Hint it is along the same lines as federal thought.
States were not considered any less a threat to liberty then the federal system.
Sure they can. Duhhh.
This problem and similar ones can exist on all levels of government right down to deed restricted neighborhoods which many are stupid enough to buy into.
Sure they can? I made no comment on whether they could or could not. I only commented on what the thoughts were at the time of our formation.
The founders gave unchecked power to tax, with the understanding anything extremely oppressive would be met with resistance from the people. Those same sentiments were also felt about the states.
Anyone read the article? The judge just said that having a cow and consuming your own milk is a states right thing.
The Federal constitution said nothing about certain foods being protected by the constitution.
So how can strict constitutalionists disagree with this decision?
Especially if they are against the FDA.
Whenever anyone asks me why I think the government is the problem I think of things like this.
WI Judge to Zinniker, FTCLDF: No "Fundamental Right" to Own a Cow, or Consume Its Milk...Am I Making Myself*Clear? - Journal - The Complete Patient - The Business of Your Health
I am sure someone thinks this idiot is right, but I cannot imagine it.
Your side always says how fucked up the government is and how they cant do anything right...unless they are bombing a fucking contry and killing people...the the government is just doing a fine job. Righty?
I am pretty sure you cannot find a single post where I defended bombing a country.
Your side always says how fucked up the government is and how they cant do anything right...
Off with his head, break out the Guillotine!
And do you know who would be behind such legislation? Try Cargill and Monsanto. They want to control and profit from EVERY bite of food you put in your mouth and that is grown in the ground. These are two of the most sinister and dangerous corporations out there. THIS is the very reason we need to get all corporate influence OUT of our government, especially these guys.
Whatever happened to "government OF the PEOPLE, FOR the PEOPLE, and BY the PEOPLE", huh? Or now, is it supposed to be "OF the STATE, FOR the STATE, and BY the STATE? I guess we can see what this judge thinks......
Business Minds in Government are not always a bad thing, sometimes very necessary when establishing balance.
Business Minds in Government are not always a bad thing, sometimes very necessary when establishing balance.
I respectfully disagree. The business "minds" are only there to influence legislation to ensure more profit for their industry, 99% of the time, to the detriment of the rest of us and our country. Eliminate all corporate monies coming into government. Overturn corporations' "citizenship" as they have done nothing but abuse it. Allow only real people to send money to campaigns and cap that at $100. Problem solved.
Whenever anyone asks me why I think the government is the problem I think of things like this.
This court is unwilling to declare that there is a fundamental right to consume the food of one's choice without first being presented with significantly more developed arguments on both sides of the issue." Gee, I thought they both had to do with the right to decide what to do with your own body. As if to show how pissed he was at being questioned, he said his decision translates further that "no, Plaintiffs to not have a fundamental right to own and use a dairy cow or a dairy herd;
"no, Plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to consume the milk from their own cow;"
And in a kind of exclamation point, he added this to his list of no-nos: "no, Plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to produce and consume the foods of their choice..."
WI Judge to Zinniker, FTCLDF: No "Fundamental Right" to Own a Cow, or Consume Its Milk...Am I Making Myself*Clear? - Journal - The Complete Patient - The Business of Your Health
I am sure someone thinks this idiot is right, but I cannot imagine it.
Where does it say it in the Constitution?
You are confusing Unfair Lobbying Interests with All Business Interest.