You don't say...lol

Discussion in 'Environment' started by SassyIrishLass, Aug 13, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. daveman
    Online

    daveman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Messages:
    54,036
    Thanks Received:
    6,105
    Trophy Points:
    1,810
    Location:
    On the way to the Dark Tower.
    Ratings:
    +8,460
    And don't forget when Klimate Kultists want skeptics jailed and executed.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. daveman
    Online

    daveman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Messages:
    54,036
    Thanks Received:
    6,105
    Trophy Points:
    1,810
    Location:
    On the way to the Dark Tower.
    Ratings:
    +8,460
    No, dood. Your problem is we understand what's going on very well indeed.

    You, however, have been told what to believe -- and you lack the wit to question your programming.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. Confounding
    Offline

    Confounding Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2016
    Messages:
    5,984
    Thanks Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +6,010
    I bet you couldn't even read and comprehend work done by actual climate scientists.
     
  4. SSDD
    Offline

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    15,634
    Thanks Received:
    1,685
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +9,104
    Agreed...I don't understand the mindset of someone who apologizes for a branch of science that can't produce any observed, measured evidence which supports their mainstream hypothesis over natural variability.

    How do you support a branch of sceince that doesn't provide sufficient evidence for people who agree with them to support their position?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. jc456
    Offline

    jc456 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2013
    Messages:
    71,924
    Thanks Received:
    5,046
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +27,275
    Maybe it’s you
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 2
  6. SSDD
    Offline

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    15,634
    Thanks Received:
    1,685
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +9,104
    Most of us skeptics have spent a great deal of time reviewing what passes for science in the field of climatology...it's why we are skeptics. Have the studies which found that skeptics have a better grasp of science than AGW believers escaped you?
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  7. jc456
    Offline

    jc456 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2013
    Messages:
    71,924
    Thanks Received:
    5,046
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +27,275
    Then post one observed piece of data that shows man is causing warming? Go. Since you’re not confused, that should be easy
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. Confounding
    Offline

    Confounding Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2016
    Messages:
    5,984
    Thanks Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +6,010
    Do you think you have a better understanding of science than climate scientists the world over?
     
  9. baileyn45
    Offline

    baileyn45 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2015
    Messages:
    4,767
    Thanks Received:
    2,547
    Trophy Points:
    1,030
    Ratings:
    +4,572
    "almost all climate scientists have come to a general agreement". Care to prove that statement? And better yet qualify it? Man made emissions must have an effect? Most would agree. Man made emissions are the primary driver? Not so much. Dire consequences? Virtually none.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. daveman
    Online

    daveman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Messages:
    54,036
    Thanks Received:
    6,105
    Trophy Points:
    1,810
    Location:
    On the way to the Dark Tower.
    Ratings:
    +8,460
    "Actual" climate scientists...lemme guess. Those who support AGW?

    Climate science is, above everything else, statistics.

    How many statisticians have been involved in writing the models that analyze the data? For that matter, how many statisticians have been involved in the data "corrections" that happen all the time?

    Hint: None. You have unqualified people writing models based on cherry-picked data to arrive at predetermined conclusions -- and you insist we wreck the economies of the entire Western world based on this nonsense? And you claim the scientifically moral high ground here?

    I know of no reason I shouldn't laugh in your face.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page