Yearning For A Capitalist Society

[Moonglow]

I was a waiter in OKC in the later 1970's and early 1980's...When I moved to NW Arkanass and tried to get a job as a waiter I was told that only females can wait tables......Most discriminating..... Where I live now, only females can be cashiers in convenient stores run by whites...

"...tried to get a job as a waiter I was told that only females can wait tables...."
Perhaps you shouldn't have appeared for the job with your pants down.

"...only females can be cashiers in convenient stores run by whites.."
Again, a moron.

You hate the truth, doncha!?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Perhaps that should be 'yearning for honesty....'

Many actually disclaim that this is a socialist/communist/totalitarian one, administered by Liberal/Democrat apparatchiks....

See, when the government can use regulations to dictate every initiative of a private business endeavor, you can call it a capitalist, profit based business environment....but it ain't.

Case in point:


1. "Restaurant owner blasts city fines over single-gender ads

2. .... a downtown eatery was fined $5,000 fine just for placing an ad for “waitresses” ...

a, Bruno’s Italian eatery, Sistina, was slammed with its own $5,000 fine after a staffer placed an ad on Craigslist for a “hostess.”

b. ... the Windsor, a Greenwich Village sports bar, was fined after a sting by the city Commission on Human Rights caught it trying to hire “waitresses”

3. Gender-specific ads violate city civil-rights law.

4. Sistina, on Second Avenue at East 81st Street, employs a staff of 21 that includes three women.
One of them, Lara Kineavy, 24, said she posted the “hostess” ad on July 28 without giving a second thought to gender.
“I just wrote it as I would write any other ad,” she recalled.

5. Sistina’s e-mail account then received two résumés — one from a man and one from a woman. Both turned out to be “testers” from the commission.

Kineavy says Sistina did not respond to either e-mail. But in its complaint against the restaurant, the commission claimed only one e-mail — the one containing the woman’s résumé — was opened."
Restaurant owner blasts city fines over single-gender ads New York Post



Why can't a so-called private business be allowed to make the kind of decisions that it decides benefit its bottom line????



Or, at least, have the political party that informs and enforces these outrageous 'laws' admit that it is no different than the former Soviet Union???

You want to go back to Jim Crow to avoid being confused with the USSR?

lolol

And no women's suffrage................

Every day, it seems, there's some stupid, ugly, insalubrious imbecile whose mission is to lay out the usual, lying Leftist propaganda bumper-stickers.
I see, today, you've volunteered for that role.

Woman's suffrage determines what job said woman may have????

Yep, it means that you'll spend more time bare foot and pregnant,,,,,

Neat version of a white flag, you've got there.

 

[Freemason9]

You obviously don't understand what "communism" is, PC. Nice trolling, though!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Perhaps that should be 'yearning for honesty....'

Many actually disclaim that this is a socialist/communist/totalitarian one, administered by Liberal/Democrat apparatchiks....

See, when the government can use regulations to dictate every initiative of a private business endeavor, you can call it a capitalist, profit based business environment....but it ain't.

Case in point:


1. "Restaurant owner blasts city fines over single-gender ads

2. .... a downtown eatery was fined $5,000 fine just for placing an ad for “waitresses” ...

a, Bruno’s Italian eatery, Sistina, was slammed with its own $5,000 fine after a staffer placed an ad on Craigslist for a “hostess.”

b. ... the Windsor, a Greenwich Village sports bar, was fined after a sting by the city Commission on Human Rights caught it trying to hire “waitresses”

3. Gender-specific ads violate city civil-rights law.

4. Sistina, on Second Avenue at East 81st Street, employs a staff of 21 that includes three women.
One of them, Lara Kineavy, 24, said she posted the “hostess” ad on July 28 without giving a second thought to gender.
“I just wrote it as I would write any other ad,” she recalled.

5. Sistina’s e-mail account then received two résumés — one from a man and one from a woman. Both turned out to be “testers” from the commission.

Kineavy says Sistina did not respond to either e-mail. But in its complaint against the restaurant, the commission claimed only one e-mail — the one containing the woman’s résumé — was opened."
Restaurant owner blasts city fines over single-gender ads New York Post



Why can't a so-called private business be allowed to make the kind of decisions that it decides benefit its bottom line????



Or, at least, have the political party that informs and enforces these outrageous 'laws' admit that it is no different than the former Soviet Union???

You want to go back to Jim Crow to avoid being confused with the USSR?

lolol

Actually, you moron, I don't want to "go back to Jim Crow."



Not surprising that you jammed your foot into your mouth again....
. Don't forget that Jim Crow was an example of Democrat liberal big government in action.

You complain that a business can't advertise a job for women only, and call that an attack on 'capitalism'.

What if it were a job advertisement for whites only?

Link to such ad, you dope?

Feel better? lol

 

[PoliticalChic]

You obviously don't understand what "communism" is, PC. Nice trolling, though!

Isn't it dangerous to use one's entire vocabulary in a single post?

 

[NYcarbineer]

I am, regrettably, old enough to remember when the employment classifieds had separate columns for male help wanted and female help wanted. And it was legal to be so.

Why go back to that?

So.....you have no such an ad that you can link to?

But we both knew that, didn't we, you loser.

You are so far out of your league you can't even see the next league up from you.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I am, regrettably, old enough to remember when the employment classifieds had separate columns for male help wanted and female help wanted. And it was legal to be so.

Why go back to that?

So.....you have no such an ad that you can link to?

But we both knew that, didn't we, you loser.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I am, regrettably, old enough to remember when the employment classifieds had separate columns for male help wanted and female help wanted. And it was legal to be so.

Why go back to that?

So.....you have no such an ad that you can link to?

But we both knew that, didn't we, you loser.

Where is the word "white." you lying fool?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I am, regrettably, old enough to remember when the employment classifieds had separate columns for male help wanted and female help wanted. And it was legal to be so.

Why go back to that?

So.....you have no such an ad that you can link to?

But we both knew that, didn't we, you loser.

You are so far out of your league you can't even see the next league up from you.

NYC....or just another of your lies?

 

[NYcarbineer]

I am, regrettably, old enough to remember when the employment classifieds had separate columns for male help wanted and female help wanted. And it was legal to be so.

Why go back to that?

So.....you have no such an ad that you can link to?

But we both knew that, didn't we, you loser.

Where is the word "white." you lying fool?

Where is the word white in your OP? Where is the word white in my post that you responded to?

You're objecting to employers not being able to discriminate when hiring.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I am, regrettably, old enough to remember when the employment classifieds had separate columns for male help wanted and female help wanted. And it was legal to be so.

Why go back to that?

So.....you have no such an ad that you can link to?

But we both knew that, didn't we, you loser.

Where is the word "white." you lying fool?

Where is the word white in your OP? Where is the word white in my post that you responded to?

You're objecting to employers not being able to discriminate when hiring.

Was this your post?