Street Juice
Platinum Member
I am a nationalist because humans group. We group according to our race, our gender, our culture, our religion, our language, our politics, our education, our occupation, our region, our age, and in many other ways. We also group according to nation.
All groupings carry the potential for conflict and destructive relations, but only the nation grouping is capable of embracing all the other groupings without destroying them. Thus, nations are the way to preserve the diversity of humanity. This is why we should be emphasizing our nationhood, rather than our race, for example. We should be American voters, not white voters, or female voters, or Muslim voters. If we are all proud nationalists (as we were until fairly recently), then we can entrust the power of the law to the nation as well as the security of our future.
Globalism is the enemy of nationalism. The globalist wants to see the power of the law condensed to a single point. This necessarily requires the elimination of borders (because, while borders are, indeed, imaginary lines, they are very real separations between two systems of law), which, in turn, eliminates the nation. And the diversity of the world contained in the diversity of nations is gone as well. This, in my view, would be a tragic loss. That's why I am a nationalist. And I'm white, so I am a white nationalist.
All groupings carry the potential for conflict and destructive relations, but only the nation grouping is capable of embracing all the other groupings without destroying them. Thus, nations are the way to preserve the diversity of humanity. This is why we should be emphasizing our nationhood, rather than our race, for example. We should be American voters, not white voters, or female voters, or Muslim voters. If we are all proud nationalists (as we were until fairly recently), then we can entrust the power of the law to the nation as well as the security of our future.
Globalism is the enemy of nationalism. The globalist wants to see the power of the law condensed to a single point. This necessarily requires the elimination of borders (because, while borders are, indeed, imaginary lines, they are very real separations between two systems of law), which, in turn, eliminates the nation. And the diversity of the world contained in the diversity of nations is gone as well. This, in my view, would be a tragic loss. That's why I am a nationalist. And I'm white, so I am a white nationalist.