Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Steve Bannon is the exact opposite of Rush Limbaugh.
Rush Limbaugh was a selfish, piece of shit, globalist.
It is difficult to break it all down. But it wasn’t an attempted coup. That term has no applicability to that protest or the smallish component of the protest that behaved as a criminal mob.& were actively hunting down congress critters, including the speaker of the house - the 3rd in line for the presidency.
pence sought out avenues to do exactly that - including speaking with dan quale. when pence realised there was nothing he could do for his president, THEN he went along with the rule set forth in the constitution. but he tried.
a failed coup is still an attempted coup. if a bank robber failed at getting the cash - is he still criminally culpable?
of course it can.
& the ones that were 'peaceful' weren't arrested, & are not on the FBI wanted list.
He accepted the pardon. That is considered an admission of guilt. I suppose the thinking there is an innocent man cannot be pardoned for something he didn't do.
Your reliance on the leftist-media orchestrated claim that what happened was an “insurrection” only serves to prove that you are one of the easily-misled gullible tools upon whom they rely.
What crime did he commit?
Some of the acts of defiance were indeed criminal. Like trespass. Like destruction of property. Like physical assaults against any of the Capitol Police. Of course, I don’t believe I ever contended that such things were anything but criminal.that 'act of defiance' is criminal.
Google is my friend.bannon - POS.... being the racist that he is View attachment 564346
bannon - selfish... by defrauding donny's deplorable base & keeping the cash for himself
View attachment 564346
bannon - globalist.... by being arrested for said fraud on a bigley yacht owned by a chinese billionare
View attachment 564346
Some people claim that accepting a pardon is somehow an admission of guilt. It isn’t. But I can understand how it looks that way.
1915…desperate?not just 'some people' but also the SC.
U.S. Supreme Court
Burdick v. United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915)
Burdick v. United States
No. 471
Argued December 16, 1914
Decided January 25, 1915
236 U.S. 79
Syllabus
Acceptance, as well as delivery, of a pardon is essential to its validity; if rejected by the person to whom it is tendered, the court has no power to force it on him. United States v. Wilson, 7 Pet. 150.
There are substantial differences between legislative immunity and a pardon; the latter carries an imputation of guilt and acceptance of a confession of it, while the former is noncommittal, and tantamount to silence of the witness.
There is a distinction between amnesty and pardon; the former overlooks the offense, and is usually addressed to crimes against the sovereignty of the state and political offenses, the latter remits punishment and condones infractions of the peace of the state.
Burdick v. United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915)
Some of the acts of defiance were indeed criminal. Like trespass. Like destruction of property. Like physical assaults against any of the Capitol Police. Of course, I don’t believe I ever contended that such things were anything but criminal.
1915…desperate?
Google is my friend.
I am not a newbie. I’ll take your pass. I don’t care all that much about the labels of “progressive” or “conservative” or “independent” in many cases. I’m not arguing for the most part with labels. I’m arguing with individual positions.now now ... let's keep this civil, shall we? i'm gonna give you a pass - cause, for all intents & purposes - you are a 'newbie' to me.
but let's make one thing clear - i am an indie. going by what i've read of yer posts so far, it's crystal clear that i have voted for more (R)s than you would ever vote for someone across the aisle.
i never go by reports by ANY media ... until i research them myself. i don't even have cable.
howeverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr..................... i also know wtf i saw on jan 6 .... i know what was said weeks to days leading up to jan 6....................................
& i know who said what from the (R) side of that there aisle, before donny got ahold of them.
but it's crystal clear where you stand.
Bannon really does want to take the whole system down. He really is that sick. And trump is right there with him.
No. It means that you place stock in One longtime espoused view that accepting a pardon somehow constitutes an admission of guilt. It doesn’t. In point of fact, accepting a pardon means you are allowing the system to return you to your pre conviction legal status — which includes a presumption of innocence.LOL!!!! nice try grouchooooooooooooooo....
it's a standing opinion of the court. know what that means? that means it hasn't changed. so when the sausage casing accepted the pardon - he also admitted guilt.
learn to think critically.
The administrative state is an abomination. It should be rooted out.' deconstruct the administrative state ' ~ steve bannon
I am not a newbie.
I’ll take your pass.
I don’t care all that much about the labels of “progressive” or “conservative” or “independent” in many cases. I’m not arguing for the most part with labels. I’m arguing with individual positions.
I do find that liberals or progressives and those with similar mindsets are prone to accepting the effort of the media to couch things in a particular way.
The media does this as the unofficial apparatchiks OF the left-wing and the Dim Party.
It often makes meaningful discussion much more difficult. Opponents get saddled with language that starts them off at a disadvantage. That’s it’s purpose.
As a consequence, I make an effort to identify their loaded misuse of terminology.
And when it occurs to me, I take pains to throw the flag on it.
One of my long time mantras is that “words have meaning.” They are SUPPOSED to anyway.
No. It means that you place stock in One longtime espoused view that accepting a pardon somehow constitutes an admission of guilt. It doesn’t.
In point of fact, accepting a pardon means you are allowing the system to return you to your pre conviction legal status — which includes a presumption of innocence.
gee. I wonder why a person who is innocent might want that? It’s a real poser, isn’t it? Such a tough question.
If it didn’t delight you, you would denigrate the decision as outdated.LOL!!!! nice try grouchooooooooooooooo....
it's a standing opinion of the court. know what that means? that means it hasn't changed. so when the sausage casing accepted the pardon - he also admitted guilt.
learn to think critically.
No one has bothered to challenge it and the USSC doesn’t care?LOL!!!! nice try grouchooooooooooooooo....
it's a standing opinion of the court. know what that means? that means it hasn't changed. so when the sausage casing accepted the pardon - he also admitted guilt.
learn to think critically.
