rtwngAvngr
Senior Member
- Jan 5, 2004
- 15,755
- 513
- 48
- Banned
- #21
sitarro said:They are for a sane look at the deal and the assurances that are built into the contract to assure our country's safety rather than the low brow, paranoid, simplistic, reactionary opinion based on no facts whatsoever. Michael Savage is known for that type of reaction and tends to make an ass of himself daily. What a bunch of chicken shits it makes us look like. I expect this lack of Capitalistic thought from Socialist and protectionist but not from those that say they are conservative.
The USA is projecting weakness to the rest of the world while anyone with the least amount of braincells understands that it would be much cheaper and easier to fly one of the two flights a day coming from the UAE to New York into whatever target they want. If the UAE is untrustworthy how can we allow them to inspect the aircraft that come across our border everyday? The UAE also knows they would be deemed responsible for anything that would happen and would know that it would be taken out on them in a worse way. You do realize we are talking about people that are closer to American Capitalist ideals than anyone in the Middle East and most of Europe and we are insulting them with this bullshit.
I have never claimed to have the knowledge needed to make a truely informed decision, that is what I trust our elected officials to do without partison bickering and bullshit press conferences like this one.
The UAE has enough involvement with terrorism for me to be against the deal. You can perfume the turd as much as you'd like, it's still a turd. You can insult it's detractors as much as you like, it's still a turd. Keep telling yourself you're the only sane one, the only rational one, the only one who REALLY understands the impact on our international relations. I think you're wrong.