You're kidding, right? You would have me (and all these "lurkers") believe that in your years of "researching" 9/11 you have never stumbled across any of the more popular 9/11 CT websites, all of which dedicate entire sections to disinformation in which they whine about those who willfully or for other reasons (like ignorance or stupidity) dump what you do on the Internet?
Here's another CT Website (TruthMove.org) which also laments your right to dilute or even destroy their message, unequivocally stating:
"... The opposition prefers dealing with topics that can be easily countered, or that simply make 9/11 skeptics look like kooks. Controlled demolition and no plane at the Pentagon are some of the most incredible theories in the movement."
TruthMove - Disinformation
OK, so PROVE that there was an airliner at the PENTAGON and indeed PROVE the allegation that the airliner was hijacked.......
Don't change the subject, Princess. You pretended there are no credible voices within the 9/11 CT Movement who consider the pap you spew here to be so un-credible as to be DISINFORMATION ... an attempt by peeps like you to discredit the entire Movement! When I prove there are whole sections of the most popular CT websites dedicated to trashing you, you quickly try to change the subject.
"whole sections of the most popular CT websites dedicated to trashing you,"
Unlike some people on these forums, I tend to NOT take it personally when people disagree. There WILL be disagreement on various facets of the story, and that is fine, everybody has their opinion, I'm just asking were is the physical proof of there ever having been an airliner crashed at any one of the 4 crash sites alleged to have been on 9/11/2001(?)
They don't just disagree with you, they reject your absurd scenarios, claiming you have discredited and perhaps killed their already lame 9/11 CT Movement.
Even your comrades see you as a flaming loon, Princess. Wake up and smell what you are shoveling.