Contumacious
Radical Freedom
FBI didnāt pursue evidence of potential false statements, obstruction of justice and destruction of evidence.
The closer we look at the FBIās investigative file on Hillary Clintonās emails, the more we wonder if Director James Comey always intended to let her off the hook. The calculated release before the long Labor Day weekend suggests political favoritism, and the report shows the FBI didnāt pursue evidence of potential false statements, obstruction of justice and destruction of evidence.
Mr. Comeyās concessions start with his decision not to interview Mrs. Clinton until the end of his investigation, a mere three days before he announced his conclusions. Regular FBI practice is to get a subject on the record early then see if his story meshes with what agents find. In this case they accepted Mrs. Clintonās I-donāt-recall defenses after the fact.
The notes also show the G-men never did grill Mrs. Clinton on her āintentā in setting up her server. Instead they bought her explanation that it was for personal convenience. This helped Mr. Comey avoid concluding that her purpose was to evade statutes like the Federal Records Act. Mr. Comey also told Congress that indicting her without criminal intent would pose a constitutional problem. But Congress has written many laws that donāt require criminal intent, and negligent homicide (for example) has never been unconstitutional."
.
.
The closer we look at the FBIās investigative file on Hillary Clintonās emails, the more we wonder if Director James Comey always intended to let her off the hook. The calculated release before the long Labor Day weekend suggests political favoritism, and the report shows the FBI didnāt pursue evidence of potential false statements, obstruction of justice and destruction of evidence.
Mr. Comeyās concessions start with his decision not to interview Mrs. Clinton until the end of his investigation, a mere three days before he announced his conclusions. Regular FBI practice is to get a subject on the record early then see if his story meshes with what agents find. In this case they accepted Mrs. Clintonās I-donāt-recall defenses after the fact.
The notes also show the G-men never did grill Mrs. Clinton on her āintentā in setting up her server. Instead they bought her explanation that it was for personal convenience. This helped Mr. Comey avoid concluding that her purpose was to evade statutes like the Federal Records Act. Mr. Comey also told Congress that indicting her without criminal intent would pose a constitutional problem. But Congress has written many laws that donāt require criminal intent, and negligent homicide (for example) has never been unconstitutional."
.
.
