Woman Forcibly Sedated, And Baby Stolen From Her Womb By Social Services

Noomi

Ninja Kicker
Jul 6, 2012
18,121
4,006
255
Australia
Yep, you can't make this shit up.

Italian woman had a break down, and social services obtained a court order, which allowed them to forcibly sedate the woman - without telling her what would happen to her - and when she woke, she was told that her baby had been delivered by caesarean (which she didn't consent to) and the child in care. The baby is now 15 months old and the woman, who is recovering well, is not allowed to have her baby back:

A pregnant woman has had her baby forcibly removed by caesarean section by social workers.

Essex social services obtained a High Court order against the woman that allowed her to be forcibly sedated and her child to be taken from her womb.

The council said it was acting in the best interests of the woman, an Italian who was in Britain on a work trip, because she had suffered a mental breakdown.

The baby girl, now 15 months old, is still in the care of social services, who are refusing to give her back to the mother, even though she claims to have made a full recovery.

Woman has child taken from her womb by social services - Telegraph

What kind of shit is this, Britain? You cannot go around forcing women to give birth, having unnecessary surgeries, just because you think they are not fit to be parents!!!!
 
Yep, you can't make this shit up.

Italian woman had a break down, and social services obtained a court order, which allowed them to forcibly sedate the woman - without telling her what would happen to her - and when she woke, she was told that her baby had been delivered by caesarean (which she didn't consent to) and the child in care. The baby is now 15 months old and the woman, who is recovering well, is not allowed to have her baby back:

A pregnant woman has had her baby forcibly removed by caesarean section by social workers.

Essex social services obtained a High Court order against the woman that allowed her to be forcibly sedated and her child to be taken from her womb.

The council said it was acting in the best interests of the woman, an Italian who was in Britain on a work trip, because she had suffered a mental breakdown.

The baby girl, now 15 months old, is still in the care of social services, who are refusing to give her back to the mother, even though she claims to have made a full recovery.

Woman has child taken from her womb by social services - Telegraph

What kind of shit is this, Britain? You cannot go around forcing women to give birth, having unnecessary surgeries, just because you think they are not fit to be parents!!!!

Sweetheart, that is what we lovingly refer to as socialism
 
Yep, you can't make this shit up.

Italian woman had a break down, and social services obtained a court order, which allowed them to forcibly sedate the woman - without telling her what would happen to her - and when she woke, she was told that her baby had been delivered by caesarean (which she didn't consent to) and the child in care. The baby is now 15 months old and the woman, who is recovering well, is not allowed to have her baby back:

A pregnant woman has had her baby forcibly removed by caesarean section by social workers.

Essex social services obtained a High Court order against the woman that allowed her to be forcibly sedated and her child to be taken from her womb.

The council said it was acting in the best interests of the woman, an Italian who was in Britain on a work trip, because she had suffered a mental breakdown.

The baby girl, now 15 months old, is still in the care of social services, who are refusing to give her back to the mother, even though she claims to have made a full recovery.

Woman has child taken from her womb by social services - Telegraph

What kind of shit is this, Britain? You cannot go around forcing women to give birth, having unnecessary surgeries, just because you think they are not fit to be parents!!!!

Sweetheart, that is what we lovingly refer to as socialism

Ignorant nonsense.

The UK is not ‘socialist.’
 
What about what was best for the mother?






In a socialist state the person exists for the benefit of the state dear. You are expected to die for your country. What is best for YOU doesn't matter.

And another ignorant rightist chimes in.

Please, then enlighten us with your everloving knowledge about why a baby was forcibly taken by "social" workers eh.

If that is not a symptom of socialism, I don't know what is
 
Yep, you can't make this shit up.

Italian woman had a break down, and social services obtained a court order, which allowed them to forcibly sedate the woman - without telling her what would happen to her - and when she woke, she was told that her baby had been delivered by caesarean (which she didn't consent to) and the child in care. The baby is now 15 months old and the woman, who is recovering well, is not allowed to have her baby back:

A pregnant woman has had her baby forcibly removed by caesarean section by social workers.

Essex social services obtained a High Court order against the woman that allowed her to be forcibly sedated and her child to be taken from her womb.

The council said it was acting in the best interests of the woman, an Italian who was in Britain on a work trip, because she had suffered a mental breakdown.

The baby girl, now 15 months old, is still in the care of social services, who are refusing to give her back to the mother, even though she claims to have made a full recovery.
Woman has child taken from her womb by social services - Telegraph

What kind of shit is this, Britain? You cannot go around forcing women to give birth, having unnecessary surgeries, just because you think they are not fit to be parents!!!!

If only someone had seen this coming when they started letting the government protect them from bad decisions.

Wait they did, and fought a war, but you didn't like the people who won.
 
In a socialist state the person exists for the benefit of the state dear. You are expected to die for your country. What is best for YOU doesn't matter.

And another ignorant rightist chimes in.

Please, then enlighten us with your everloving knowledge about why a baby was forcibly taken by "social" workers eh.

If that is not a symptom of socialism, I don't know what is

Perhaps you should inform the conservative PM of the UK his country is ‘socialist.’
 
And another ignorant rightist chimes in.

Please, then enlighten us with your everloving knowledge about why a baby was forcibly taken by "social" workers eh.

If that is not a symptom of socialism, I don't know what is

Perhaps you should inform the conservative PM of the UK his country is ‘socialist.’

You are really this moronic?
Just because they have not declared themselves a socialist state, does not negate the fact that they are socialists
 
Yep, you can't make this shit up.

Italian woman had a break down, and social services obtained a court order, which allowed them to forcibly sedate the woman - without telling her what would happen to her - and when she woke, she was told that her baby had been delivered by caesarean (which she didn't consent to) and the child in care. The baby is now 15 months old and the woman, who is recovering well, is not allowed to have her baby back:



Woman has child taken from her womb by social services - Telegraph

What kind of shit is this, Britain? You cannot go around forcing women to give birth, having unnecessary surgeries, just because you think they are not fit to be parents!!!!

Sweetheart, that is what we lovingly refer to as socialism

Ignorant nonsense.

The UK is not ‘socialist.’

And the moon is made of green cheese.
 
And another ignorant rightist chimes in.

Please, then enlighten us with your everloving knowledge about why a baby was forcibly taken by "social" workers eh.

If that is not a symptom of socialism, I don't know what is

Perhaps you should inform the conservative PM of the UK his country is ‘socialist.’

I am pretty sure that, unlike you, he knows his country is socialist.

David Cameron vows to crush Ed Miliband's '1970s-style socialism' | Mail Online
 
Liberals support every socialist that runs for office, then are shocked when they act like socialists.
 
What about what was best for the mother?






In a socialist state the person exists for the benefit of the state dear. You are expected to die for your country. What is best for YOU doesn't matter.

And another ignorant rightist chimes in.






No, I'm an INDIVIDUALIST. I believe in the maximum rights and responsibilities for the INDIVIDUAL, and a weak government. You see dear imbecile, collectivist governments have killed more people in 100 years than all the religions have in 2000 years. I read history, you relive it, over and over again.
 
Yep, you can't make this shit up.

Italian woman had a break down, and social services obtained a court order, which allowed them to forcibly sedate the woman - without telling her what would happen to her - and when she woke, she was told that her baby had been delivered by caesarean (which she didn't consent to) and the child in care. The baby is now 15 months old and the woman, who is recovering well, is not allowed to have her baby back:

A pregnant woman has had her baby forcibly removed by caesarean section by social workers.

Essex social services obtained a High Court order against the woman that allowed her to be forcibly sedated and her child to be taken from her womb.

The council said it was acting in the best interests of the woman, an Italian who was in Britain on a work trip, because she had suffered a mental breakdown.

The baby girl, now 15 months old, is still in the care of social services, who are refusing to give her back to the mother, even though she claims to have made a full recovery.

Woman has child taken from her womb by social services - Telegraph

What kind of shit is this, Britain? You cannot go around forcing women to give birth, having unnecessary surgeries, just because you think they are not fit to be parents!!!!

Clearly British officials are just as concerned about the incident.

From the cited article:

The case, reported by Christopher Booker in his column in The Sunday Telegraph today, raises fresh questions about the extent of social workers’ powers.

It will be raised in Parliament this week by John Hemming, a Liberal Democrat MP. He chairs the Public Family Law Reform Coordinating Campaign, which wants reform and greater openness in court proceedings involving family matters.

He said: “I have seen a number of cases of abuses of people’s rights in the family courts, but this has to be one of the more extreme.

“It involves the Court of Protection authorising a caesarean section without the person concerned being made aware of what was proposed. I worry about the way these decisions about a person’s mental capacity are being taken without any apparent concern as to the effect on the individual being affected.”
 
Yep, you can't make this shit up.

Italian woman had a break down, and social services obtained a court order, which allowed them to forcibly sedate the woman - without telling her what would happen to her - and when she woke, she was told that her baby had been delivered by caesarean (which she didn't consent to) and the child in care. The baby is now 15 months old and the woman, who is recovering well, is not allowed to have her baby back:

A pregnant woman has had her baby forcibly removed by caesarean section by social workers.

Essex social services obtained a High Court order against the woman that allowed her to be forcibly sedated and her child to be taken from her womb.

The council said it was acting in the best interests of the woman, an Italian who was in Britain on a work trip, because she had suffered a mental breakdown.

The baby girl, now 15 months old, is still in the care of social services, who are refusing to give her back to the mother, even though she claims to have made a full recovery.

Woman has child taken from her womb by social services - Telegraph

What kind of shit is this, Britain? You cannot go around forcing women to give birth, having unnecessary surgeries, just because you think they are not fit to be parents!!!!

Clearly British officials are just as concerned about the incident.

From the cited article:

The case, reported by Christopher Booker in his column in The Sunday Telegraph today, raises fresh questions about the extent of social workers’ powers.

It will be raised in Parliament this week by John Hemming, a Liberal Democrat MP. He chairs the Public Family Law Reform Coordinating Campaign, which wants reform and greater openness in court proceedings involving family matters.

He said: “I have seen a number of cases of abuses of people’s rights in the family courts, but this has to be one of the more extreme.

“It involves the Court of Protection authorising a caesarean section without the person concerned being made aware of what was proposed. I worry about the way these decisions about a person’s mental capacity are being taken without any apparent concern as to the effect on the individual being affected.”








I suggest you take a look at the NHS if you would like to see what is coming up for us here in the US. Of course you won't bother to. Sad.
 

Forum List

Back
Top