Delta4Embassy
Gold Member
Oh, it's been thrown out. But, here you go, you have to read it.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/307282/150505-lawsuit-against-all-gays.pdf
Never seen a hand-written court document before. Sure this was legit?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oh, it's been thrown out. But, here you go, you have to read it.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/307282/150505-lawsuit-against-all-gays.pdf
Oh, it's been thrown out. But, here you go, you have to read it.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/307282/150505-lawsuit-against-all-gays.pdf
Nebraska Woman Sues All Gay People Yes All of ThemIt's incredible how gullible you lefty's can be.
You will believe anything that the left tell you.
I am curious about something.
Suppose a judge, ignoring law and rational behavior, agrees to hear the case. And suppose, again ignoring law and rational behavior, this judge pronounces homosexuality a sin.
What then? Sin is a religious concept, and there is no law forbidding anyone from committing a sin (strictly as a sin).
What would this accomplish?
Nebraska Woman Sues All Gay People Yes All of ThemIt's incredible how gullible you lefty's can be.
You will believe anything that the left tell you.
Oh, it's been thrown out. But, here you go, you have to read it.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/307282/150505-lawsuit-against-all-gays.pdf
It's Nebraska.
I give her a 50/50 shot of winning.
Not just Nebraska. I have no doubt there are fundie nutter hate groups (and individuals) in every state.
This board is lousy with them .............
I was unaware that federal judges have the power to determine what sin is. I was under the impression they were specifically to not rule on religious doctrine.
Who did this woman find to represent her? Or is she representing herself? Either way the attorney shouldnt be allowed in a courtroom again, unless someone else is representing them.
I was unaware that federal judges have the power to determine what sin is. I was under the impression they were specifically to not rule on religious doctrine.
Who did this woman find to represent her? Or is she representing herself? Either way the attorney shouldnt be allowed in a courtroom again, unless someone else is representing them.
Link at Time says she woulda represented herself. Seem to recall something about fools...
Right, so how would the judge be able to hear the case and rule. Hence, throw it out.I was unaware that federal judges have the power to determine what sin is. I was under the impression they were specifically to not rule on religious doctrine.
Who did this woman find to represent her? Or is she representing herself? Either way the attorney shouldnt be allowed in a courtroom again, unless someone else is representing them.
I was unaware that federal judges have the power to determine what sin is. I was under the impression they were specifically to not rule on religious doctrine.
Who did this woman find to represent her? Or is she representing herself? Either way the attorney shouldnt be allowed in a courtroom again, unless someone else is representing them.
Link at Time says she woulda represented herself. Seem to recall something about fools...
I'm curious how.she planned to provide notice to all the gay people of the world. Or what damages supposedly existed to her. Or how she could establish herself as a legitimate agent of Jesus Christ and God for standing.
Not just Nebraska. I have no doubt there are fundie nutter hate groups (and individuals) in every state.
This board is lousy with them .............