Winter Does Not Disprove Global Warming

Yeah it is. All you have to do is examine the global temperature record. Why is it that you believe your unqualified opinion has any bearing on what the temperature record presents?

No it is not. Sorry that dog has already died.

Only to the scientifically illiterate.
The illiterate ones are those who can't read the memo from the scientific community telling them to hide or cover up their findings
 
Actually the LA Times and Reddit are only the beginning. More and more reputable publications are considering banning the denier cult spamming and trolling.








LOLOLOL.....relax, little retard, you've already proven that you're either insane or a paid troll getting paid by the post. You don't have to keep on proving it over and over again.

Oh, and BTW, perhaps you should contact these folks and explain your wackadoodle notions about how "Global Warming is NOT a scientific concept". I'm sure they could use a good laugh too.

The American Geophysical Union (AGU) statement, adopted by the society in 2003, revised in 2007, and revised and expanded in 2013, affirms that rising levels of greenhouse gases have caused and will continue to cause the global surface temperature to be warmer:
“Human activities are changing Earth’s climate. At the global level, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases have increased sharply since the Industrial Revolution. Fossil fuel burning dominates this increase. Human-caused increases in greenhouse gases are responsible for most of the observed global average surface warming of roughly 0.8°C (1.5°F) over the past 140 years. Because natural processes cannot quickly remove some of these gases (notably carbon dioxide) from the atmosphere, our past, present, and future emissions will influence the climate system for millennia. While important scientific uncertainties remain as to which particular impacts will be experienced where, no uncertainties are known that could make the impacts of climate change inconsequential. Furthermore, surprise outcomes, such as the unexpectedly rapid loss of Arctic summer sea ice, may entail even more dramatic changes than anticipated."


The American Meteorological Society (AMS) statement adopted by their council in 2012 concluded:
There is unequivocal evidence that Earth’s lower atmosphere, ocean, and land surface are warming; sea level is rising; and snow cover, mountain glaciers, and Arctic sea ice are shrinking. The dominant cause of the warming since the 1950s is human activities. This scientific finding is based on a large and persuasive body of research. The observed warming will be irreversible for many years into the future, and even larger temperature increases will occur as greenhouse gases continue to accumulate in the atmosphere. Avoiding this future warming will require a large and rapid reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions. The ongoing warming will increase risks and stresses to human societies, economies, ecosystems, and wildlife through the 21st century and beyond, making it imperative that society respond to a changing climate. To inform decisions on adaptation and mitigation, it is critical that we improve our understanding of the global climate system and our ability to project future climate through continued and improved monitoring and research. This is especially true for smaller (seasonal and regional) scales and weather and climate extremes, and for important hydroclimatic variables such as precipitation and water availability.

Technological, economic, and policy choices in the near future will determine the extent of future impacts of climate change. Science-based decisions are seldom made in a context of absolute certainty. National and international policy discussions should include consideration of the best ways to both adapt to and mitigate climate change. Mitigation will reduce the amount of future climate change and the risk of impacts that are potentially large and dangerous. At the same time, some continued climate change is inevitable, and policy responses should include adaptation to climate change. Prudence dictates extreme care in accounting for our relationship with the only planet known to be capable of sustaining human life.
(Source: Scientific opinion on climate change)

but nobody cares........

69% Say It?s Likely Scientists Have Falsified Global Warming Research - Rasmussen Reports?

Drill, Baby, Drill: U.S. Energy Revolution Being Heard ?Round the World, Yergin Says | Daily Ticker - Yahoo Finance

EIA Report Estimates Growth of U.S. Energy Economy Through 2040 | Department of Energy

Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian

Global surveys show environmental concerns rank low among public concerns

People Are Losing Hope For Green Energy - Business Insider

What climate change? Fewer people than EVER believe the world is really warming up | UK | News | Daily Express

Internet science debates are gay. "Consensus" science is making zero impact in the real world ( see Obama EIA link above ). Im fine being the forum cultist delusional "retard".:2up:
But Im winning!!!:rock::rock::rock::rock::rock::rock::rock::rock::rock::rock::rock::rock:


Unfortunately, 50% of adults have a below average reading comprehension, IQ, and scientific education.

And, you are a fine example.







And the two surveys that have been done show that sceptics are more scientifically educated and more conversant with technology than you guys. SO CATCH UP!
 

Just more braindead conspiracy theory nonsense for retards, as usual for bigbozo's posts.

Climate sceptics more likely to be conspiracy theorists and free market advocates, study claims
Research confirms previous findings which caused fury among sceptics of human-caused climate change

The Guardian
2 October 2013

You're the brain dead one, pushing those talking points that have already been debunked.
Sorry junior you need to pull up your big boy shorts and find another talking point to argue with.
 

I wanted to make certain everyone was aware that the quote marks around "cover up" did not indicate that was a statement of any authority aimed at climate scientists, but actually a quote from the alarmist, scandal-breeding comment of the Guardian. No government authorities told climate scientists to "cover up" any of their findings.

The IPCC was created and is paid for by the world's government and ever since the beginning, they have had inputs into the content, style and format of the final reports. Since the beginning, the government has consistently urged greater caution in the IPCCs reporting than what was desired by the researchers actually assembling them.
 
Last edited:
yeah and you better listen to random internets nutters who offer no proof and merely spout off stupid lines as if they are smart.

while denying science that sent us to the moon and cured many diseases
 
I wonder if the idiots who said the universe orbits the earth ever admitted they were wrong after bullying science for so many many years?

probably not.

but Im sure their friends thought they were cool though huh?



I just dont understand how fox and lush Limpballs can find this many dishonest and stupid people to do their bidding?


what do these earth is the center of the universe people think they gain by denying science and licking the ass of their wealthy owners as if the would cure cancer instead of sceince?

their Ceos dont much care if these minions die of cancer or not
 
yeah and you better listen to random internets nutters who offer no proof and merely spout off stupid lines as if they are smart.

while denying science that sent us to the moon and cured many diseases



"random internet nutters"


Honey.......you need to be aware of your post total!! It doesn't mesh with throwing out the term "nutters" to other people. Just sayin'........:tinfoil:
 
yeah and you better listen to random internets nutters who offer no proof and merely spout off stupid lines as if they are smart.

while denying science that sent us to the moon and cured many diseases







Had NASA used the quality of scientists that populate the field of climatology our rockets would never have got off the ground. You see there are good scientists and bad ones. So far climatology has been a repository for the very bad ones.
 
I wonder if the idiots who said the universe orbits the earth ever admitted they were wrong after bullying science for so many many years?

probably not.

but Im sure their friends thought they were cool though huh?



I just dont understand how fox and lush Limpballs can find this many dishonest and stupid people to do their bidding?


what do these earth is the center of the universe people think they gain by denying science and licking the ass of their wealthy owners as if the would cure cancer instead of sceince?

their Ceos dont much care if these minions die of cancer or not







Considering they had been dead for centuries by the time that fact was known I sort of doubt it!:lol::lol::lol:

But then again, you've never let a thing like facts ever enter your tiny little head, have you:lol::lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top