Will you condemn this murder?

[Hollie]

The issue of voting/elections is a subject the outside observers should not be involved in addressing. This is strictly a Arab Palestinian domestic issue.

If only that were true, for example, in the 2005 Presidential elections Abbas, the candidate favoured by the West and Zionist was elected by a margin of 40% when opinion polls has predicted a much closer race. THe Palestinian CEC, cited several factors that interfered with the electoral process not least of which was,

"Although freedom of movement is a fundamental right guaranteed by all laws, Israeli authorities have continued to violate this right. The Israeli restrictions on movement constitute a grave violation of article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which stipulates that "every individual has the right to free movement and to choose his/her residency within the boarders of the state….".Such breaches negatively affect the electoral process, and restrict the movement of voters, candidates and CEC staff.

The closure of roads is a commonly used Israeli policy which restricts the movements of Palestinians. The Israeli authorities have constructed more than 600 road closures in the West Bank. Road closures restrict the movement of Palestinians between the villages and cities and prevent them from reaching registration and polling centers. Road closures continue to restrict the movement of candidates between the Palestinian governorates, especially between Jerusalem and Gaza during the electoral campaigning period, which is the legal period in which candidates are allowed to conduct electoral campaigning activities."

Central Elections Commission - Palestine

Central Elections Commission - Palestine

Central Elections Commission - Palestine

In the 2006 PLC elections once again Zionist Israel interefered by arresting 450 HAMAS candidates and afterwards continually interfered in domestic Palestinian politics

Carter Center Urges Israel to Release Palestinian Legislators

Abbas is kept in power by the West and Zionist Israel, all of whom cannot risk free and fair unhindered elections within Occupied Palestine.

EYUP.

It's all one grand conspiracy involving the Great Satan and the Zionists.

 

[Phoenall]

AND ! ! ! ! what does this have to do with the topic of this thread ?

Roccor

Also to blame, of course, are the law enforcement authorities, starting with the Judea and Samaria District Police – the most ridiculous and scandalous of all police districts, and not by chance. Nine Palestinian homes were torched in the past three years, according to B’Tselem. How many people have been prosecuted? None. So what happened in Duma on Friday? The fire was simply better, in the eyes of the arsonists and their minions.

Their minions also include the silent, the forgiving and all those who think the evil will remain forever within the confines of the West Bank. Their minions also include the Israelis who are convinced that the People of Israel is the chosen people, and as a result is permitted to do anything – including torching the homes of non-Jews, with their inhabitants inside.
read more: All Israelis Are Guilty of Setting a Palestinian Family on Fire Opinion Haaretz Daily Newspaper Israel News

P F Tinmore, et al,

The UN does not designate terrorists organization in that way.

(COMMENT)

All terrorist activities hide behind the fact that the UN has not defined "terrorism" on the Global Level (a concept without a universally accepted definition); but rather --- an umbrella description on a level of political activism that employees a measure of depravity to coercion and intimidation a population of governed entity to accept a political end state. (Like pornography: You know it when you see it. Just as there is no true definition universally accepted for "political violence.") No one argues that the Palestinian Olympic Massacre, or the attack on October 15, 2003 when an explosion on a diplomatic convoy traveling through the Gaza Strip killed four Americans (and the several hundred hijackings, suicide bombings, and ambushes in between) were not Palestinian terrorist attacks designed to make a statement.

NOTE: To be clear, not all Palestinians are terrorists. However most Palestinians have provided material support to terrorist activities in one form or another. HAMAS is a political movement that opposes the basic tenants of the UN Charter [Article 2(4)] and the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States; relative to the threat or use of force. It is a self-proclaimed Jihadist organization. The argument that it is a democratically elected governments (from nearly a decade ago) on goes to lend evidence that the People of Gaza support a government that supports terrorism; and lends protection training facilities and safe havens to other terrorist groups.
​

Terrorism, and the associated activities, are a crime(s) committed by persons, organizations or governments. These crimes or activities have, thus far, been defined either under individual domestic law of member nations, or by economic and/or security cooperatives. The European Union defines it as:

Article 1

Terrorist offences and fundamental rights and principles

1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the intentional acts referred to below in points (a) to (i), as defined as offences under national law, which, given their nature or context, may seriously damage a country or an international organisation where committed with the aim of:

- seriously intimidating a population, or

- unduly compelling a Government or international organisation to perform or abstain from performing any act, or

- seriously destabilising or destroying the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organisation,
​

shall be deemed to be terrorist offences:

(a) attacks upon a person's life which may cause death;

(b) attacks upon the physical integrity of a person;

(c) kidnapping or hostage taking;

(d) causing extensive destruction to a Government or public facility, a transport system, an infrastructure facility, including an information system, a fixed platform located on the continental shelf, a public place or private property likely to endanger human life or result in major economic loss;

(e) seizure of aircraft, ships or other means of public or goods transport;

(f) manufacture, possession, acquisition, transport, supply or use of weapons, explosives or of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, as well as research into, and development of, biological and chemical weapons;

(g) release of dangerous substances, or causing fires, floods or explosions the effect of which is to endanger human life;

(h) interfering with or disrupting the supply of water, power or any other fundamental natural resource the effect of which is to endanger human life;

(i) threatening to commit any of the acts listed in (a) to (h).​

Terrorism as a form of political activism is recognized or defined by their organizational actions, or in the some cases, self-defined (Jihadists or Islamists).

Murder is a domestic crime. Depending on the intent, magnitude and purpose, it can be a war crime, a crime against humanity, terrorism, or any combination thereof. To be an terrorism, there must be the element of the threat or use of force to project intimidation or coercion. Clearly, when Leon Klinghoffer, a disabled jewish American appliance manufacturer, who was murdered and thrown overboard by Palestinian Terrorists (Abu Abbas) who pirated the cruise ship Achille Lauro in 1985; the Palestinian Terrorist were making a statement. Similarly, when three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped at the bus/hitchhiking stop at the Israeli settlement, and HAMAS official Salah al-Arouri (founder of the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the Hamas military), and publicly acknowledged the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, was behind the kidnappings and murder, --- this event as well, was used as a means of coercion and intimidation (making a political statement). And the threat does not have to be militarily effective to create an atmosphere of intimidation:

"Are the tunnels a new calamity capable of changing the balance of power in Gaza? Probably not. It’s difficult to find instances when tunnel tactics have fundamentally altered the course of a war. They are, by nature, tactics born of desperation. But they have always been effective in sowing fear. It’s no coincidence that we’re hearing a lot about tunnels precisely when events in Gaza find the Israelis in desperate need of friends."
SOURCE: Washington Post Gerard DeGroot is a professor of history at the University of St Andrews in Scotland.
​

Over and over again, I've seen the Palestinian Terrorist try and hide behind the argument that there is no UN Definition for terrorist or terrorism, per sa, yet there is no question that the UN Security Council can recognize it when they see it. Not only does the UN have a complete Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy in place, but the Security Council has passed over three dozen Resolutions (since the beginning of the 21st Century) that implement the strategy.

The Palestinians (in particular HAMAS) need to argue this point (and the point that it is NOT an international conflict --- an argument in itself that is a double-edged sword) because UN Security Council Resolution 1373 stipulates that it: "Reaffirming the need to combat by all means, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts."

Most Respectfully,
R

But Hamas are not terrorists in Palestine where they were elected and supported.

They don't buy into that foreign name calling crap.

Interesting @ 1:10

And how many times were they REelected...when was their last election?

They haven't had elections since the US trashed their entire political system in 2007.

WRONG the reason is that hamas knows that it would not win another election so has refused to hold elections since 2007. It has nothing to do with Israel or the USA

You need to come up to speed.

Deputy National Security Advisor, Elliott Abrams — who Newsweek recently described as “the last neocon standing” — has had it about for some months now that the U.S. is not only not interested in dealing with Hamas, it is working to ensure its failure. In the immediate aftermath of the Hamas elections, last January, Abrams greeted a group of Palestinian businessmen in his White House office with talk of a “hard coup” against the newly-elected Hamas government — the violent overthrow of their leadership with arms supplied by the United States. While the businessmen were shocked, Abrams was adamant — the U.S. had to support Fatah with guns, ammunition and training, so that they could fight Hamas for control of the Palestinian government. - See more at: Elliot Abrams Uncivil War Conflicts Forum​

-------------------------------

After failing to anticipate Hamas’s victory over Fatah in the 2006 Palestinian election, the White House cooked up yet another scandalously covert and self-defeating Middle East debacle: part Iran-contra, part Bay of Pigs. With confidential documents, corroborated by outraged former and current U.S. officials, the author reveals how President Bush, Condoleezza Rice, and Deputy National-Security Adviser Elliott Abrams backed an armed force under Fatah strongman Muhammad Dahlan, touching off a bloody civil war in Gaza and leaving Hamas stronger than ever.

The Gaza Bombshell Vanity Fair​

AND ! ! ! ! what does this have to do with the topic of this thread ?

Now why have hamas refused to allow elections to take place ?

 

[P F Tinmore]

AND ! ! ! ! what does this have to do with the topic of this thread ?

Roccor

Also to blame, of course, are the law enforcement authorities, starting with the Judea and Samaria District Police – the most ridiculous and scandalous of all police districts, and not by chance. Nine Palestinian homes were torched in the past three years, according to B’Tselem. How many people have been prosecuted? None. So what happened in Duma on Friday? The fire was simply better, in the eyes of the arsonists and their minions.

Their minions also include the silent, the forgiving and all those who think the evil will remain forever within the confines of the West Bank. Their minions also include the Israelis who are convinced that the People of Israel is the chosen people, and as a result is permitted to do anything – including torching the homes of non-Jews, with their inhabitants inside.
read more: All Israelis Are Guilty of Setting a Palestinian Family on Fire Opinion Haaretz Daily Newspaper Israel News

But Hamas are not terrorists in Palestine where they were elected and supported.

They don't buy into that foreign name calling crap.

Interesting @ 1:10

And how many times were they REelected...when was their last election?

They haven't had elections since the US trashed their entire political system in 2007.

WRONG the reason is that hamas knows that it would not win another election so has refused to hold elections since 2007. It has nothing to do with Israel or the USA

You need to come up to speed.

Deputy National Security Advisor, Elliott Abrams — who Newsweek recently described as “the last neocon standing” — has had it about for some months now that the U.S. is not only not interested in dealing with Hamas, it is working to ensure its failure. In the immediate aftermath of the Hamas elections, last January, Abrams greeted a group of Palestinian businessmen in his White House office with talk of a “hard coup” against the newly-elected Hamas government — the violent overthrow of their leadership with arms supplied by the United States. While the businessmen were shocked, Abrams was adamant — the U.S. had to support Fatah with guns, ammunition and training, so that they could fight Hamas for control of the Palestinian government. - See more at: Elliot Abrams Uncivil War Conflicts Forum​

-------------------------------

After failing to anticipate Hamas’s victory over Fatah in the 2006 Palestinian election, the White House cooked up yet another scandalously covert and self-defeating Middle East debacle: part Iran-contra, part Bay of Pigs. With confidential documents, corroborated by outraged former and current U.S. officials, the author reveals how President Bush, Condoleezza Rice, and Deputy National-Security Adviser Elliott Abrams backed an armed force under Fatah strongman Muhammad Dahlan, touching off a bloody civil war in Gaza and leaving Hamas stronger than ever.

The Gaza Bombshell Vanity Fair​

AND ! ! ! ! what does this have to do with the topic of this thread ?

Now why have hamas refused to allow elections to take place ?

 

[JFish123]

Some Crucial Information





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Phoenall]

West Bank arson: Dead Palestinian child's father dies of wounds
A Palestinian man whose child was killed in an arson attack blamed on Jewish settlers has died of his injuries.

Saad Dawabsha, 32, died in an Israeli hospital where he was being treated for second-degree burns to most of his body.

His son Ali, 18 months, died in the attack in the village of Duma in the occupied West Bank on 31 July.

His mother and his four-year-old brother remain in critical condition.

Relatives said the funeral would take place on Saturday.

'Price tag attack'
The family's small home was firebombed in the night, and daubed with slogans in Hebrew, including the word "revenge".

West Bank arson Dead Palestinian child s father dies of wounds - BBC News

And still no conclusive evidence that the attack was carried out by Jews. far too many times we see that Palestinians were the ones carrying out attacks and blaming the Jews for them.

 

[Phoenall]

West Bank arson: Dead Palestinian child's father dies of wounds
A Palestinian man whose child was killed in an arson attack blamed on Jewish settlers has died of his injuries.

Saad Dawabsha, 32, died in an Israeli hospital where he was being treated for second-degree burns to most of his body.

His son Ali, 18 months, died in the attack in the village of Duma in the occupied West Bank on 31 July.

His mother and his four-year-old brother remain in critical condition.

Relatives said the funeral would take place on Saturday.

'Price tag attack'
The family's small home was firebombed in the night, and daubed with slogans in Hebrew, including the word "revenge".

West Bank arson Dead Palestinian child s father dies of wounds - BBC News

And still no conclusive evidence that the attack was carried out by Jews. far too many times we see that Palestinians were the ones carrying out attacks and blaming the Jews for them.

 

[Phoenall]

Sad, but not condemned?

Produce the criminals and I will be the first to condemn them, until then you are just being a racist troll

 

[Phoenall]

Challenger, Fanger, et al,

The issue of voting/elections is a subject the outside observers should not be involved in addressing. This is strictly a Arab Palestinian domestic issue.

Did they? Got a link to support that allegation? My understanding was that America Israel and the Quartet won't allow fresh elections in case Hamas win again with a greater majority.

(COMMENT)

If the Arab Palestinians cannot resolve this question (should they --- or --- should they not have elections), then in effect, the Arab Palestinians do not have an effective government. Whether of not they have the ability to administer their nation in a democratic way under their Constitution is something they have to demonstrate.

Israel and the Quartet (UN, US, EU, and Russia) should not have a role in the decision making process.

Post # 250: Also to blame, of course, are the law enforcement authorities, starting with the Judea and Samaria District Police – the most ridiculous and scandalous of all police districts, and not by chance.

Our friend "Fanger" made the point recently that Israeli Law Enforcement is not policing the West Bank Settlers to the degree it should. This is --- without question --- a critical issue. And this should not allow to be continued. Matters of selective enforcement in favor of the Israeli settlers is unacceptable.

Especially of concern, to both the Israelis and the US, is the every growing concern that radical activism by Jewish West Bank settlers has evolved into a level of violence is approaching what could be described as cellular independent (domestic "Lone Wolf") type terrorism. Israel has to make more than a concerted effort to detect, investigate, protect against, exploit and neutralize (make apprehension and effectively prosecute) these radicalize Jews. The Israelis cannot allow homegrown terrorist to develop within the territory type claim as under Israeli jurisdiction. Israel cannot be seen as permitting far-right Jewish extremist with fringe ideologies to run-amuck in the territory creating havoc and engaging in activities that would be otherwise unlawful anywhere in Israel.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Palestinians have a 50,000 (?) man security force. They are not allowed to defend Palestinians.

That is totally nuts.

Nothing stopping them from doing so in the areas they control under international treaty. But they did threaten to withdraw their security forces this year

 

[RoccoR]

Challenger, et al,

You say that as if "public diplomacy" is something bad!

Nope, wrong again. Whoever you are you are definitely a Hasbara troll and I claim my £50.00 spotter's reward.

(COMMENT)

For someone that advocates for the Hostile Arab Palestinian to violate --- the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States; --- or promote the incitement of terrorist acts and repudiating attempts at the justification or glorification (apologie) of terrorist acts that may incite further terrorist acts; --- and dissemination of propaganda which is either designed or likely to provoke or encourage and threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression; --- you sure don't much ground to stand on.

• 110 (II). Measures to be taken against propaganda and the inciters of a new war.
• 2625 (XXV). Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
• UN Security Council Resolution 1624 (2005)

(QUESTION)

Is your advocacy of violence against Israel a threat to the peace, encouraging a breach of the peace, or provoking an act of aggression?

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

Challenger, et al,

You say that as if "public diplomacy" is something bad!

Nope, wrong again. Whoever you are you are definitely a Hasbara troll and I claim my £50.00 spotter's reward.

(COMMENT)

For someone that advocates for the Hostile Arab Palestinian to violate --- the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States; --- or promote the incitement of terrorist acts and repudiating attempts at the justification or glorification (apologie) of terrorist acts that may incite further terrorist acts; --- and dissemination of propaganda which is either designed or likely to provoke or encourage and threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression; --- you sure don't much ground to stand on.

• 110 (II). Measures to be taken against propaganda and the inciters of a new war.
• 2625 (XXV). Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
• UN Security Council Resolution 1624 (2005)

(QUESTION)

Is your advocacy of violence against Israel a threat to the peace, encouraging a breach of the peace, or provoking an act of aggression?

Most Respectfully,
R

You keep posting this stuff but you never show how it applies to the Palestinians.

 

[Challenger]

Challenger, et al,

You say that as if "public diplomacy" is something bad!

Nope, wrong again. Whoever you are you are definitely a Hasbara troll and I claim my £50.00 spotter's reward.

(COMMENT)

For someone that advocates for the Hostile Arab Palestinian to violate --- the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States; --- or promote the incitement of terrorist acts and repudiating attempts at the justification or glorification (apologie) of terrorist acts that may incite further terrorist acts; --- and dissemination of propaganda which is either designed or likely to provoke or encourage and threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression; --- you sure don't much ground to stand on.

• 110 (II). Measures to be taken against propaganda and the inciters of a new war.
• 2625 (XXV). Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
• UN Security Council Resolution 1624 (2005)

(QUESTION)

Is your advocacy of violence against Israel a threat to the peace, encouraging a breach of the peace, or provoking an act of aggression?

Most Respectfully,
R

Explain to me please the difference between Hasbara (Public Diplomacy) and Propaganda (Public Enlightenment)

Public diplomacy Israel - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Reichs Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Then provide a universally accepted definition of the word "terrorist" and I might take this post seriously.

 

[Phoenall]

The issue of voting/elections is a subject the outside observers should not be involved in addressing. This is strictly a Arab Palestinian domestic issue.

If only that were true, for example, in the 2005 Presidential elections Abbas, the candidate favoured by the West and Zionist was elected by a margin of 40% when opinion polls has predicted a much closer race. THe Palestinian CEC, cited several factors that interfered with the electoral process not least of which was,

"Although freedom of movement is a fundamental right guaranteed by all laws, Israeli authorities have continued to violate this right. The Israeli restrictions on movement constitute a grave violation of article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which stipulates that "every individual has the right to free movement and to choose his/her residency within the boarders of the state….".Such breaches negatively affect the electoral process, and restrict the movement of voters, candidates and CEC staff.

The closure of roads is a commonly used Israeli policy which restricts the movements of Palestinians. The Israeli authorities have constructed more than 600 road closures in the West Bank. Road closures restrict the movement of Palestinians between the villages and cities and prevent them from reaching registration and polling centers. Road closures continue to restrict the movement of candidates between the Palestinian governorates, especially between Jerusalem and Gaza during the electoral campaigning period, which is the legal period in which candidates are allowed to conduct electoral campaigning activities."

Central Elections Commission - Palestine

Central Elections Commission - Palestine

Central Elections Commission - Palestine

In the 2006 PLC elections once again Zionist Israel interefered by arresting 450 HAMAS candidates and afterwards continually interfered in domestic Palestinian politics

Carter Center Urges Israel to Release Palestinian Legislators

Abbas is kept in power by the West and Zionist Israel, all of whom cannot risk free and fair unhindered elections within Occupied Palestine.

EYUP.

It's all one grand conspiracy involving the Great Satan and the Zionists.

You must be Phoney's girlfriend, the neo-Nazi one; or has he dumped her for you?

You must be that angry Mahmoud who is the target of ridicule.

Nope, wrong again. Whoever you are you are definitely a Hasbara troll and I claim my £50.00 spotter's reward.

And rat boy once again trolls the board with his hasbara claims, and not once has he given any evidence to support his islamonazi lies.

 

[Phoenall]

Challenger, et al,

You say that as if "public diplomacy" is something bad!

Nope, wrong again. Whoever you are you are definitely a Hasbara troll and I claim my £50.00 spotter's reward.

(COMMENT)

For someone that advocates for the Hostile Arab Palestinian to violate --- the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States; --- or promote the incitement of terrorist acts and repudiating attempts at the justification or glorification (apologie) of terrorist acts that may incite further terrorist acts; --- and dissemination of propaganda which is either designed or likely to provoke or encourage and threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression; --- you sure don't much ground to stand on.

• 110 (II). Measures to be taken against propaganda and the inciters of a new war.
• 2625 (XXV). Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
• UN Security Council Resolution 1624 (2005)

(QUESTION)

Is your advocacy of violence against Israel a threat to the peace, encouraging a breach of the peace, or provoking an act of aggression?

Most Respectfully,
R

You keep posting this stuff but you never show how it applies to the Palestinians.

They signed the UN charter making them liable if they are in breach of it. So propaganda and blood libels are in breach pf the UN charter, so time to invoke the ICC/ICJ

 

[Phoenall]

Well it seems you know a lot about retrogression and self-hate.

Because we see that much of it in the pro palli posters on this board

 

[Phoenall]

Challenger, et al,

You say that as if "public diplomacy" is something bad!

Nope, wrong again. Whoever you are you are definitely a Hasbara troll and I claim my £50.00 spotter's reward.

(COMMENT)

For someone that advocates for the Hostile Arab Palestinian to violate --- the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States; --- or promote the incitement of terrorist acts and repudiating attempts at the justification or glorification (apologie) of terrorist acts that may incite further terrorist acts; --- and dissemination of propaganda which is either designed or likely to provoke or encourage and threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression; --- you sure don't much ground to stand on.

• 110 (II). Measures to be taken against propaganda and the inciters of a new war.
• 2625 (XXV). Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
• UN Security Council Resolution 1624 (2005)

(QUESTION)

Is your advocacy of violence against Israel a threat to the peace, encouraging a breach of the peace, or provoking an act of aggression?

Most Respectfully,
R

Explain to me please the difference between Hasbara (Public Diplomacy) and Propaganda (Public Enlightenment)

Public diplomacy Israel - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Reichs Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Then provide a universally accepted definition of the word "terrorist" and I might take this post seriously.

Why don't you explain the difference between Nazi lies and propaganda and islamonazi lies and propaganda ?

By the way hasbara was a college movement and not a state ran and sanctioned propaganda machine as your own links showed.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Challenger, et al,

You say that as if "public diplomacy" is something bad!

Nope, wrong again. Whoever you are you are definitely a Hasbara troll and I claim my £50.00 spotter's reward.

(COMMENT)

For someone that advocates for the Hostile Arab Palestinian to violate --- the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States; --- or promote the incitement of terrorist acts and repudiating attempts at the justification or glorification (apologie) of terrorist acts that may incite further terrorist acts; --- and dissemination of propaganda which is either designed or likely to provoke or encourage and threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression; --- you sure don't much ground to stand on.

• 110 (II). Measures to be taken against propaganda and the inciters of a new war.
• 2625 (XXV). Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
• UN Security Council Resolution 1624 (2005)

(QUESTION)

Is your advocacy of violence against Israel a threat to the peace, encouraging a breach of the peace, or provoking an act of aggression?

Most Respectfully,
R

You keep posting this stuff but you never show how it applies to the Palestinians.

They signed the UN charter making them liable if they are in breach of it. So propaganda and blood libels are in breach pf the UN charter, so time to invoke the ICC/ICJ

OK, so where is the breach?

 

[Phoenall]

Challenger, et al,

You say that as if "public diplomacy" is something bad!

Nope, wrong again. Whoever you are you are definitely a Hasbara troll and I claim my £50.00 spotter's reward.

(COMMENT)

For someone that advocates for the Hostile Arab Palestinian to violate --- the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States; --- or promote the incitement of terrorist acts and repudiating attempts at the justification or glorification (apologie) of terrorist acts that may incite further terrorist acts; --- and dissemination of propaganda which is either designed or likely to provoke or encourage and threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression; --- you sure don't much ground to stand on.

• 110 (II). Measures to be taken against propaganda and the inciters of a new war.
• 2625 (XXV). Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
• UN Security Council Resolution 1624 (2005)

(QUESTION)

Is your advocacy of violence against Israel a threat to the peace, encouraging a breach of the peace, or provoking an act of aggression?

Most Respectfully,
R

You keep posting this stuff but you never show how it applies to the Palestinians.

They signed the UN charter making them liable if they are in breach of it. So propaganda and blood libels are in breach pf the UN charter, so time to invoke the ICC/ICJ

OK, so where is the breach?

Where would you like me to start.

How about the living in peace with your neighbours ?

Or the negotiating mutual borders

Or the stopping of belligerence

Or the stopping of blood libels

Or the stopping of propaganda

And the last goes on and on. Time to invoke the UN charter and drag the P.A. to the ICC/ICJ

 

[P F Tinmore]

Challenger, et al,

You say that as if "public diplomacy" is something bad!

Nope, wrong again. Whoever you are you are definitely a Hasbara troll and I claim my £50.00 spotter's reward.

(COMMENT)

For someone that advocates for the Hostile Arab Palestinian to violate --- the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States; --- or promote the incitement of terrorist acts and repudiating attempts at the justification or glorification (apologie) of terrorist acts that may incite further terrorist acts; --- and dissemination of propaganda which is either designed or likely to provoke or encourage and threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression; --- you sure don't much ground to stand on.

• 110 (II). Measures to be taken against propaganda and the inciters of a new war.
• 2625 (XXV). Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
• UN Security Council Resolution 1624 (2005)

(QUESTION)

Is your advocacy of violence against Israel a threat to the peace, encouraging a breach of the peace, or provoking an act of aggression?

Most Respectfully,
R

You keep posting this stuff but you never show how it applies to the Palestinians.

They signed the UN charter making them liable if they are in breach of it. So propaganda and blood libels are in breach pf the UN charter, so time to invoke the ICC/ICJ

OK, so where is the breach?

Where would you like me to start.

How about the living in peace with your neighbours ?

Palestine is not hostile to any of its neighbors.

Or the negotiating mutual borders

Palestine does not need to change any of its borders.

Or the stopping of belligerence

Examples?

Or the stopping of blood libels

Examples?

Or the stopping of propaganda

Examples?

And the last goes on and on. Time to invoke the UN charter and drag the P.A. to the ICC/ICJ

Indeed, some violations by the PA were listed in the Goldstone Report. Israel blew its chance.

 

[Phoenall]

Challenger, et al,

You say that as if "public diplomacy" is something bad!

(COMMENT)

For someone that advocates for the Hostile Arab Palestinian to violate --- the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States; --- or promote the incitement of terrorist acts and repudiating attempts at the justification or glorification (apologie) of terrorist acts that may incite further terrorist acts; --- and dissemination of propaganda which is either designed or likely to provoke or encourage and threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression; --- you sure don't much ground to stand on.

• 110 (II). Measures to be taken against propaganda and the inciters of a new war.
• 2625 (XXV). Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
• UN Security Council Resolution 1624 (2005)

(QUESTION)

Is your advocacy of violence against Israel a threat to the peace, encouraging a breach of the peace, or provoking an act of aggression?

Most Respectfully,
R

You keep posting this stuff but you never show how it applies to the Palestinians.

They signed the UN charter making them liable if they are in breach of it. So propaganda and blood libels are in breach pf the UN charter, so time to invoke the ICC/ICJ

OK, so where is the breach?

Where would you like me to start.

How about the living in peace with your neighbours ?

Palestine is not hostile to any of its neighbors.

Or the negotiating mutual borders

Palestine does not need to change any of its borders.

Or the stopping of belligerence

Examples?

Or the stopping of blood libels

Examples?

Or the stopping of propaganda

Examples?

And the last goes on and on. Time to invoke the UN charter and drag the P.A. to the ICC/ICJ

Indeed, some violations by the PA were listed in the Goldstone Report. Israel blew its chance.

They are or have been hostile to all their neighbours.

It has no borders until it agrees them, the mandate borders don't apply to the nation of Palestine.

Riots attacking Jews going about their business in Herusalem

Pallywood pictures of events in Syria claimed to be gaza

Lies about the numbers of people killed in exchanges of fire

Not being signatories they could not bring any cases. The Palestinians missed their chance when the ICC/ICJ stated that they had no jurisdiction over the Israeli's but had jurisdiction over the Palestinians that they found to be in breach of international law.


Stop defending the terrorists and putting them first and you will stop being hated by all the decent human beings on here.

 

[Hollie]

You keep posting this stuff but you never show how it applies to the Palestinians.

They signed the UN charter making them liable if they are in breach of it. So propaganda and blood libels are in breach pf the UN charter, so time to invoke the ICC/ICJ

OK, so where is the breach?

Where would you like me to start.

How about the living in peace with your neighbours ?

Palestine is not hostile to any of its neighbors.

Or the negotiating mutual borders

Palestine does not need to change any of its borders.

Or the stopping of belligerence

Examples?

Or the stopping of blood libels

Examples?

Or the stopping of propaganda

Examples?

And the last goes on and on. Time to invoke the UN charter and drag the P.A. to the ICC/ICJ

Indeed, some violations by the PA were listed in the Goldstone Report. Israel blew its chance.

They are or have been hostile to all their neighbours.

It has no borders until it agrees them, the mandate borders don't apply to the nation of Palestine.

Riots attacking Jews going about their business in Herusalem

Pallywood pictures of events in Syria claimed to be gaza

Lies about the numbers of people killed in exchanges of fire

Not being signatories they could not bring any cases. The Palestinians missed their chance when the ICC/ICJ stated that they had no jurisdiction over the Israeli's but had jurisdiction over the Palestinians that they found to be in breach of international law.


Stop defending the terrorists and putting them first and you will stop being hated by all the decent human beings on here.

I thought it was remarkable... well, actually not, that tinmore would claim Palestine was not hostile to its neighbors when "Palestinian" Arabs put into a position of political leadership an Islamist terrorist syndicate with a stated goal and written Charter that calls for the genocide of Israelis.