VaYank5150
Gold Member
Please respond to my #16. THAT one I directed at you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm a republican and I don't see how I can vote for Akin now. It's a very difficult spot he has put me in. He was always known for incendiary comments but now he's also tagged with selfishness and don't even get me started on the god stuff. I usually don't care about someone's religious beliefs but he is using them as his only excuse to continue when everything and everyone else is telling him to get lost.If you wasn't going to vote for mccaskill before, tell me what exactly has changed? This coming election has little to do with who is running. It has a lot to go with removing the idiots that got this country in its current mess. McCaskills record or what she did speaks much louder then the words of the guy running against her (he did apologize)
I, today, don't see a way for McCaskill to win ... To me, this is democrats grasping at anything that they think will give them hope
They can hope all they want, most people all ready know who they are voting for, baring police booking photos, that's not going to change
Very tough situation indeed
IF Akin is only speaking out loud the GOP's position on reproductive rights, why is "everything and everyone else telling him to get lost"? Hell, every bill having to do with rape introduced by Paul Ryan in his 12 years was co-written by Todd Akin. Why would Ryan now try to distance himself from him?
We all know the only real chance of ridding the country of a European healthcare system is to have 51 votes in the Senate.
Up until this week we were being practically handed Claire McCaskill's seat due to her ineptness and unpopularity.
Enter the oaf known as Todd Akin, and thanks to this selfish moron it's now doubtful we'll have any decent chance of taking the seat.
It will now be that much harder to gain the 51st seat, not only because of this particular race, but this idiot has now given the Dems an issue they can exploit that could have far reaching consequences well beyond the borders of Missouri.
What makes you think he is still ahead?
Daily Kos: New PPP flash poll finds Todd Akin's standing virtually unchanged
So, now when they fit the purpose, polls are GOOD?
We all know the only real chance of ridding the country of a European healthcare system is to have 51 votes in the Senate.
Up until this week we were being practically handed Claire McCaskill's seat due to her ineptness and unpopularity.
Enter the oaf known as Todd Akin, and thanks to this selfish moron it's now doubtful we'll have any decent chance of taking the seat.
It will now be that much harder to gain the 51st seat, not only because of this particular race, but this idiot has now given the Dems an issue they can exploit that could have far reaching consequences well beyond the borders of Missouri.
I'm a republican and I don't see how I can vote for Akin now. It's a very difficult spot he has put me in. He was always known for incendiary comments but now he's also tagged with selfishness and don't even get me started on the god stuff. I usually don't care about someone's religious beliefs but he is using them as his only excuse to continue when everything and everyone else is telling him to get lost.
Very tough situation indeed
IF Akin is only speaking out loud the GOP's position on reproductive rights, why is "everything and everyone else telling him to get lost"? Hell, every bill having to do with rape introduced by Paul Ryan in his 12 years was co-written by Todd Akin. Why would Ryan now try to distance himself from him?
The rape comments were so far out of bounds. We don't need loons representing us. It's like the guy who thought Guam might tip over. Do you really want someone like that representing you?
As for Ryan's opinion you'll have to ask him. I'm not a mind reader
IF Akin is only speaking out loud the GOP's position on reproductive rights, why is "everything and everyone else telling him to get lost"? Hell, every bill having to do with rape introduced by Paul Ryan in his 12 years was co-written by Todd Akin. Why would Ryan now try to distance himself from him?
The rape comments were so far out of bounds. We don't need loons representing us. It's like the guy who thought Guam might tip over. Do you really want someone like that representing you?
As for Ryan's opinion you'll have to ask him. I'm not a mind reader
Even if his comments were offensive, the root problem as I see it is that both he and the GOP VP Paul Ryan STILL want to deny women the right to abort a pregnancy resulting from a rape, whether that rape was "legitimate" or not...
The rape comments were so far out of bounds. We don't need loons representing us. It's like the guy who thought Guam might tip over. Do you really want someone like that representing you?
As for Ryan's opinion you'll have to ask him. I'm not a mind reader
Even if his comments were offensive, the root problem as I see it is that both he and the GOP VP Paul Ryan STILL want to deny women the right to abort a pregnancy resulting from a rape, whether that rape was "legitimate" or not...
Call me selfish but that's just not an issue I give a rat's ass about. To error on the side of life is fine by me. No one is forced to raise a child they don't want. I get that it may be hard or traumatic for someone who is rapped but it's just not a front burner issue for me. The economy is.
Even if his comments were offensive, the root problem as I see it is that both he and the GOP VP Paul Ryan STILL want to deny women the right to abort a pregnancy resulting from a rape, whether that rape was "legitimate" or not...
Call me selfish but that's just not an issue I give a rat's ass about. To error on the side of life is fine by me. No one is forced to raise a child they don't want. I get that it may be hard or traumatic for someone who is rapped but it's just not a front burner issue for me. The economy is.
REALLY? So, then if Romney/Ryan win in the fall, and repeal Roe V. Wade and force all women to carry these pregnancies to term, who is responsible for caring for the "unwanted child"? Is that NOT a problem for our economy?
Call me selfish but that's just not an issue I give a rat's ass about. To error on the side of life is fine by me. No one is forced to raise a child they don't want. I get that it may be hard or traumatic for someone who is rapped but it's just not a front burner issue for me. The economy is.
REALLY? So, then if Romney/Ryan win in the fall, and repeal Roe V. Wade and force all women to carry these pregnancies to term, who is responsible for caring for the "unwanted child"? Is that NOT a problem for our economy?
Putting cash ahead of life is pretty sad. Thousands and thousands of people are forced to adopt from overseas currently. Were adoption made less difficult then I suspect others would as well. I know I would. So tell me what is the dollar value of a human life? At what point does money become more important than life?
REALLY? So, then if Romney/Ryan win in the fall, and repeal Roe V. Wade and force all women to carry these pregnancies to term, who is responsible for caring for the "unwanted child"? Is that NOT a problem for our economy?
Putting cash ahead of life is pretty sad. Thousands and thousands of people are forced to adopt from overseas currently. Were adoption made less difficult then I suspect others would as well. I know I would. So tell me what is the dollar value of a human life? At what point does money become more important than life?
Since you are a GOP supporter, why don't you tell me? Your party is the one who fought against healtchare benefits for children when Bush was in office, and now want to repeal healthcare legislation designed to give more people access.
Putting cash ahead of life is pretty sad. Thousands and thousands of people are forced to adopt from overseas currently. Were adoption made less difficult then I suspect others would as well. I know I would. So tell me what is the dollar value of a human life? At what point does money become more important than life?
Since you are a GOP supporter, why don't you tell me? Your party is the one who fought against healtchare benefits for children when Bush was in office, and now want to repeal healthcare legislation designed to give more people access.
I'm not going to argue Bushs presidency with you. The man spent like a lib.
Repeal/Replace 2012
don't you mean 'romneycare'?
Repeal/Replace 2012
So, how much is a human life worth to you and your party, again?