Will Republicans ever learn? Indiana governor to sign bill allowing business not to serve gays

[bripat9643]

More copy and paste? Come on, surprise us all. Post something original.

You seem to suffer from an allergy to information that refutes your Einstein like pronouncements of "Queer, faggot, libruls"

I knew you couldn't do it.

 

[Bush92]

If you own a business you should be able to serve and not serve anyone of your choosing.

 

[candycorn]

Here is a little something to make Flash and Britpat and the Wingnuttia feel nostalgia a longing for days gone by ...

[/QUO0TE]..

 

[Uncensored2008]

More copy and paste? Come on, surprise us all. Post something original.

Notice his source? The hate site DailyKOS.

What a pile of shit.

 

[Uncensored2008]

If you own a business you should be able to serve and not serve anyone of your choosing.

If you LIKE your small business, you can KEEP your small business!

 

[bripat9643]

Here is a little something to make Flash and Britpat and the Wingnuttia feel nostalgia a longing for days gone by ...

[/QUO0TE]..

You and your ilk think government gets to decide who businesses must serve, not the supporters of the Indiana law.

 

[bripat9643]

If you own a business you should be able to serve and not serve anyone of your choosing.

If you LIKE your small business, you can KEEP your small business!

 

[Bush92]

the Civil Rights Act of 1964 runs contrary to the spirit of the Constitution. All the rhetoric of "the government shall not" that is contained in the Bill of Rights. If a Black man owns a business and he chooses not to serve Whites...that's his call and same with a White owner and Blacks. Now bear in mind you will lose that revenue and possibly your capital investment. If you serve all the people then you will have more business and more revenue. that's just simple economics.

 

[Silhouette]

The civil rights Act? For sons to have the right to a father and daughters to have the right to a mother in marriage you mean?

 

[bripat9643]

If you own a business you should be able to serve and not serve anyone of your choosing.

If you LIKE your small business, you can KEEP your small business!

Libturds think businesses are all government property. They must serve the purpose of politicians and bureaucrats or they don't have a right to exist.

 

[Silhouette]

You and your ilk think government gets to decide who businesses must serve, not the supporters of the Indiana law.

Race and homosexuality has nothing to do with one another. Not even remotely. Race isn't a behavior.

It is companies catering to weddings. If a gay pair, triad or whatever else would be legal by the precedent in 20 years hence asks a Christian to promote the spread of their culture (they aren't a race) by assiting what a Christan is commanded to consider heresy (the defiling of the structural meaning of the word "marriage") by announcing the service they want is for their "marriage", then a Christian has every right to refuse. If the Christian knows the person is gay, the Bible does not command them not to sell them groceries or whatever. It simply says to extend compassion in order to make a difference to that person's obvious affliction and suffering. Most gays have memories of being molested as boys:

ATLANTA [2005 Clinical Psychiatry News] -- Substance abuse is pervasive among gay men and is so intricately intertwined with epidemics of depression, partner abuse, and childhood sexual abuse that adequately addressing one issue requires attention to the others as well, said Ronald Stall, Ph.D., chief of prevention research for the division of HIV/AIDS prevention at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta...

The issue for Christians is SPECIFICALLY the request to assist in the abominaition of "gay marriage"; not to feed or to clothe or repair plumbing for homosexuals. And that is precisely because in Jude 1 it tells of how homosexual cults will spread and take over an entire culture (sound familiar? No? Just turn on the TV). It is the cult and not the individual within it that the Christian must object to or risk themselves an eternity in the pit of fire as Jude 1 of the New Testament warns. Marriage is the hub of any culture. A Christan must not enable the spread of a homosexual culture; while simultaneously that same Christian must extend compassion to the spiritual disfigurement of the suffering individual homosexual.

Therefore, it is logically impossible for a Christian to practice their faith and enable a "gay marriage" at the same time. If a Christian has to enable a "gay marriage" that Christian has been forced to completely and fundamentally abdicate his/her faith and will face the pit of fire. It is an untenable position to place a person it: the threat of jail (that will come, mark my words) or worse vs eternal soul death.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

to sum up your thoughts :"Queer, faggots , libruls"

You've never had a thought that didn't originate on a hate site.

I do not watch Fox news ....

 

[Seawytch]

the Civil Rights Act of 1964 runs contrary to the spirit of the Constitution. All the rhetoric of "the government shall not" that is contained in the Bill of Rights. If a Black man owns a business and he chooses not to serve Whites...that's his call and same with a White owner and Blacks. Now bear in mind you will lose that revenue and possibly your capital investment. If you serve all the people then you will have more business and more revenue. that's just simple economics.

So how come it has passed constitutional muster more than once?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

You and your ilk think government gets to decide who businesses must serve, not the supporters of the Indiana law.

Race and homosexuality has nothing to do with one another. Not even remotely. Race isn't a behavior.

It is companies catering to weddings. If a gay pair, triad or whatever else would be legal by the precedent in 20 years hence asks a Christian to promote the spread of their culture (they aren't a race) by assiting what a Christan is commanded to consider heresy (the defiling of the structural meaning of the word "marriage") by announcing the service they want is for their "marriage", then a Christian has every right to refuse. If the Christian knows the person is gay, the Bible does not command them not to sell them groceries or whatever. It simply says to extend compassion in order to make a difference to that person's obvious affliction and suffering. Most gays have memories of being molested as boys:

ATLANTA [2005 Clinical Psychiatry News] -- Substance abuse is pervasive among gay men and is so intricately intertwined with epidemics of depression, partner abuse, and childhood sexual abuse that adequately addressing one issue requires attention to the others as well, said Ronald Stall, Ph.D., chief of prevention research for the division of HIV/AIDS prevention at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta...

The issue for Christians is SPECIFICALLY the request to assist in the abominaition of "gay marriage"; not to feed or to clothe or repair plumbing for homosexuals. And that is precisely because in Jude 1 it tells of how homosexual cults will spread and take over an entire culture (sound familiar? No? Just turn on the TV). It is the cult and not the individual within it that the Christian must object to or risk themselves an eternity in the pit of fire as Jude 1 of the New Testament warns. Marriage is the hub of any culture. A Christan must not enable the spread of a homosexual culture; while simultaneously that same Christian must extend compassion to the spiritual disfigurement of the suffering individual homosexual.

Therefore, it is logically impossible for a Christian to practice their faith and enable a "gay marriage" at the same time. If a Christian has to enable a "gay marriage" that Christian has been forced to completely and fundamentally abdicate his/her faith and will face the pit of fire. It is an untenable position to place a person it: the threat of jail (that will come, mark my words) or worse vs eternal soul death.

what if you have an illness that gay surgeon can reverse...if you use his services you are paying him $$ to enable his "lifestyle'...bad bad Christian...

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

If you own a business you should be able to serve and not serve anyone of your choosing.

No Negroes Jews or gays

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

More copy and paste? Come on, surprise us all. Post something original.

You seem to suffer from an allergy to information that refutes your Einstein like pronouncements of "Queer, faggot, libruls"

I knew you couldn't do it.

I am not trying to meet your standards...these are your standards..."queer, faggot, libruls" ...nothing else....

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

You and your ilk think government gets to decide who businesses must serve, not the supporters of the Indiana law.

The supporters of the law met in private with Pence to sign the abomination because they are a gaggle of nut bags....and if the public saw them they would go "duuude"

 

[bripat9643]

If you own a business you should be able to serve and not serve anyone of your choosing.

No Negroes Jews or gays

If that's your preference. However, the whole reason Jim Crow laws were passed is the fact that businesses refused to discriminate against blacks. And the only reason anyone declines the business of queers is because they don't want to be involved in disgusting events like queer weddings. No one should be forced to attend an event he doesn't want to be part of.

 

[bripat9643]

You and your ilk think government gets to decide who businesses must serve, not the supporters of the Indiana law.

The supporters of the law met in private with Pence to sign the abomination because they are a gaggle of nut bags....and if the public saw them they would go "duuude"

How does that disprove what I posted?

 

[bripat9643]

More copy and paste? Come on, surprise us all. Post something original.

You seem to suffer from an allergy to information that refutes your Einstein like pronouncements of "Queer, faggot, libruls"

I knew you couldn't do it.

I am not trying to meet your standards...these are your standards..."queer, faggot, libruls" ...nothing else....

The rules prevent me from describing your standards.