Will Oligarch Bloomberg Outspend Clinton to Buy The White House?

[Slade3200]

See you’re trying to go after me for not accurately calling out Trump and in the same breath accuse me of trying to organize a lynch mob!! Haha. You can’t have it both ways. It’s either fine to be inaccurate, careless, and hyperbolic with your statements or it’s not. If it’s fine for trump then it’s fine the the lynch mobbers and it was fine for Obama and it’s fine for the media and the democrats.

the problem with your argument is you can’t get away from the facts. The facts are that what he said was not true. You don’t want to call it a lie because you picked the bad side of this argument and you’re trying to win... so instead of calling it a lie, you call it careless or inaccurate.... well it’s the same thing!!! It wasn’t true, he knew it wasn’t true, he said it anyway to the press for the word to hear!

We can do this for thousands of other statements. He does it almost every time he speaks. It is becoming the norm. You don’t see how messed up that is?!

Ok, I see you are embarrassed and trying to regain some dignity, but it is a lost cause. There is no rational basis for believing Trump knew he was making inaccurate statements or that he intended to deceive the public with them, so there is no rational basis for claiming he lied. You need to try to get control of your emotions.

so then you want to take the position that he was just misinformed? He really thought all our troops were out of Syria?!

wow, that’s a big mess up. Who do you think he fired once he found out that he was given the wrong information to innocently pass along to the American public?

Don't be stupid. He was not misinformed and he did not lie, he was merely careless in his speech. His intent at that time was to withdraw all our troops from Syria and he spoke as if it had already been accomplished. What he should have said is, all of our troops will soon be withdrawn from Syria, or we are in the process of withdrawing all our troops from Syria. This was careless speech, not a lie, and you need to label it a lie says you have no idea why you hate President Trump so much.

so he knew there were troops in Syria but said twice in one sentence that there were NO troops in Syria. But that’s not a lie because he really meant to say that he was intending on withdrawing the troops. Ohh ok. How’d that withdrawal go? And how do you know what he was intending to say?

more importantly why are you trying so hard to spin and dismiss obvious lies?!

lol It is obviously not a lie since there is no rational basis for believing he intended to deceive the public. What is obvious from your posts is that you have no idea why you hate President Trump so much.

I don’t hate trump at all mr mind reader. I’ve been a trump fan for a long time on an entertainment level. On a political and leadership level he is the worst I’ve ever seen

 

[Slade3200]

See you’re trying to go after me for not accurately calling out Trump and in the same breath accuse me of trying to organize a lynch mob!! Haha. You can’t have it both ways. It’s either fine to be inaccurate, careless, and hyperbolic with your statements or it’s not. If it’s fine for trump then it’s fine the the lynch mobbers and it was fine for Obama and it’s fine for the media and the democrats.

the problem with your argument is you can’t get away from the facts. The facts are that what he said was not true. You don’t want to call it a lie because you picked the bad side of this argument and you’re trying to win... so instead of calling it a lie, you call it careless or inaccurate.... well it’s the same thing!!! It wasn’t true, he knew it wasn’t true, he said it anyway to the press for the word to hear!

We can do this for thousands of other statements. He does it almost every time he speaks. It is becoming the norm. You don’t see how messed up that is?!

Ok, I see you are embarrassed and trying to regain some dignity, but it is a lost cause. There is no rational basis for believing Trump knew he was making inaccurate statements or that he intended to deceive the public with them, so there is no rational basis for claiming he lied. You need to try to get control of your emotions.

so then you want to take the position that he was just misinformed? He really thought all our troops were out of Syria?!

wow, that’s a big mess up. Who do you think he fired once he found out that he was given the wrong information to innocently pass along to the American public?

Don't be stupid. He was not misinformed and he did not lie, he was merely careless in his speech. His intent at that time was to withdraw all our troops from Syria and he spoke as if it had already been accomplished. What he should have said is, all of our troops will soon be withdrawn from Syria, or we are in the process of withdrawing all our troops from Syria. This was careless speech, not a lie, and you need to label it a lie says you have no idea why you hate President Trump so much.

so he knew there were troops in Syria but said twice in one sentence that there were NO troops in Syria. But that’s not a lie because he really meant to say that he was intending on withdrawing the troops. Ohh ok. How’d that withdrawal go? And how do you know what he was intending to say?

more importantly why are you trying so hard to spin and dismiss obvious lies?!

lol It is obviously not a lie since there is no rational basis for believing he intended to deceive the public. What is obvious from your posts is that you have no idea why you hate President Trump so much.

What do you mean no rational basis. He wanted to project victory and follow through with his campaign promises. So he said he beat ISIS and pulled all troops out. It’s very simple. Just not true.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Ok, I see you are embarrassed and trying to regain some dignity, but it is a lost cause. There is no rational basis for believing Trump knew he was making inaccurate statements or that he intended to deceive the public with them, so there is no rational basis for claiming he lied. You need to try to get control of your emotions.

so then you want to take the position that he was just misinformed? He really thought all our troops were out of Syria?!

wow, that’s a big mess up. Who do you think he fired once he found out that he was given the wrong information to innocently pass along to the American public?

Don't be stupid. He was not misinformed and he did not lie, he was merely careless in his speech. His intent at that time was to withdraw all our troops from Syria and he spoke as if it had already been accomplished. What he should have said is, all of our troops will soon be withdrawn from Syria, or we are in the process of withdrawing all our troops from Syria. This was careless speech, not a lie, and you need to label it a lie says you have no idea why you hate President Trump so much.

so he knew there were troops in Syria but said twice in one sentence that there were NO troops in Syria. But that’s not a lie because he really meant to say that he was intending on withdrawing the troops. Ohh ok. How’d that withdrawal go? And how do you know what he was intending to say?

more importantly why are you trying so hard to spin and dismiss obvious lies?!

lol It is obviously not a lie since there is no rational basis for believing he intended to deceive the public. What is obvious from your posts is that you have no idea why you hate President Trump so much.

I don’t hate trump at all mr mind reader. I’ve been a trump fan for a long time on an entertainment level. On a political and leadership level he is the worst I’ve ever seen

Apparently you haven't seen much or you wouldn't be embarrassing yourself by picking at trivial statements to justify your hate.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Ok, I see you are embarrassed and trying to regain some dignity, but it is a lost cause. There is no rational basis for believing Trump knew he was making inaccurate statements or that he intended to deceive the public with them, so there is no rational basis for claiming he lied. You need to try to get control of your emotions.

so then you want to take the position that he was just misinformed? He really thought all our troops were out of Syria?!

wow, that’s a big mess up. Who do you think he fired once he found out that he was given the wrong information to innocently pass along to the American public?

Don't be stupid. He was not misinformed and he did not lie, he was merely careless in his speech. His intent at that time was to withdraw all our troops from Syria and he spoke as if it had already been accomplished. What he should have said is, all of our troops will soon be withdrawn from Syria, or we are in the process of withdrawing all our troops from Syria. This was careless speech, not a lie, and you need to label it a lie says you have no idea why you hate President Trump so much.

so he knew there were troops in Syria but said twice in one sentence that there were NO troops in Syria. But that’s not a lie because he really meant to say that he was intending on withdrawing the troops. Ohh ok. How’d that withdrawal go? And how do you know what he was intending to say?

more importantly why are you trying so hard to spin and dismiss obvious lies?!

lol It is obviously not a lie since there is no rational basis for believing he intended to deceive the public. What is obvious from your posts is that you have no idea why you hate President Trump so much.

What do you mean no rational basis. He wanted to project victory and follow through with his campaign promises. So he said he beat ISIS and pulled all troops out. It’s very simple. Just not true.

Again, no rational basis for thinking he was lying. There would be no discernable difference in benefit from saying the troops are all out than in saying the troops will soon all be out.

 

[protectionist]

are you really that delusional that you honestly can’t hear a lie when there’s a lie?! That is insane! Ok you want an example? One of the thousands... here you go.

Trump said several times on camera that California admitted to a million fraudulent/illegal votes in a lawsuit brought on by Judicial watch. That is a straight up lie. The lawsuit was about clearing voter rolls not admitting to fraudulent votes.

Here is Trumps quote from meet the press, though he has several other sound bites making the same false accusation...


Trump: "Take a look at Judicial Watch. Take a look at their settlement. California admitted to a million votes. They admitted to a million votes."

Todd: "A million votes of what?"

Trump: "Take a look at Judicial …

Todd: "What are you talking about?"

Trump: "Judicial Watch made a settlement. There was …"

Todd: "About what?"

Trump: "There was much illegal voting."


Trump cited a January settlement California reached with the conservative group Judicial Watch. It requires Los Angeles County election officials to remove inactive registrations from voter rolls to comply with federal law.

The 20-page settlement document, however, notes all parties agreed there was no admission of liability or wrongdoing by the state or county. It makes no mention of voter fraud or illegal voting.

There is no evidence of this being a lie. It looks like just a matter of some complexity, where Trump may have simply gotten things wrong. I say MAY, because I'm familiar with Judicial Watch, and for them to engage in a voting matter in California that does not involve illegal voting, sounds extremely unlikely. If I had to bet on it, my money would be that Trump was 100% right, and anybody who questions illegal voting in California, is awfully stupid, or a damn liar.

I'm not buying this one. Got anything else ?

No you don’t get to excuse a lie for him accidentally getting things wrong in this case.

Trump knew that California did not admit to a million illegal votes because they never did. He made that up. And it is significant. Because he is the president of the United States and the accusation that there were millions of illegal votes undermines public confidence in our institutions and electoral process. It also stirs the divide in immigration issues. Facts are important. Trump didnt use them, he went political. He lied

Whoa! You are saying that there were NOT "millions of illegal votes" ? Where do you get that from? Upon what do you base THAT statement ?

As for confidence in our electoral process, why should we have that, when not a single state has a citizenship proof requirement for voting ?

 

[protectionist]

How about last November when Trump lied about our troops in Syria... can you tell me any time during Trumps presidency when we had no troops in Syria? Cause Trump can... except for he was lying.

"Look, we have no soldiers in Syria. We've won. We've beat ISIS. And we've beat them badly and decisively. We have no soldiers."

As usual Trump bashers spinning inaccuracies (depending on one's definitions), into lies, and labeling them that way.

Wanna talk about all the spin lies of the Trump bashers about McCain, Hollywood Access, and Khzir Khan ? We could do that.

Not really... I’d rather talk about the examples I laid out and supported with actual quotes that you are trying to spin away from.

I’m sorry to tell you but knowingly stating inaccuracies and a spin job way of describing a flat out lie. Unless your claiming he was misinformed about a lawsuit that he could have easily read, medical effects of windmill noise, and our troop presence in Syria. Or the thousands of other examples just like this that I could lay out.

So I’ll give you this, he is either severely misinformed, or incompetent of understanding simple facts in which case he would t be lying but would but grossly incapable of executing his position... or the obvious case. He knowingly lies and fabricates stories for political benefit.

That's what you're doing here right now, just like the media did with the Access Hollywood video. You ought to be happy that Trump took the pitiful 2016 economy failure, and turned it into a success.

 

[Crepitus]

The Clinton Campaign Spent between $1.5 to $2 Billion in an effort to buy her and her handlers way in to The White House.

Bloomberg has spent $400 Million so far.
And other candidates are spending money at a furious pace. Donald Trump spent only $225 Million and was outspent 6-1 by Clinton in 2016.

So the question is here:

How much money will The Democrat Party need to spend to buy The White House?

Why is a dumbass Trump cultist worried about someone spending money on a campaign?

Isn't that pretty damn hypocritical?

Or are you just jealous that Bloomberg is richer?

Why are you angry and vulgar?

We are just pointing out That These Socialists, ALL OF THEM are Multi Millionaires, so what they really mean by Promoting Socialism is MORE WEALTH AND POWER FOR THEM, and LESS FOR YOU.

The Democrat Party has always been about Slavery, and have worked since The Emancipation to promote it and create new forms of it. This is also why they oppose border security because they do no want cut off from their Brown Latino Slaves.

Explain to me why a Communist like Bernie Sanders has $107 Million Dollars in his pocket.

I'm not angry, Son. I'm asking a question. Can you not tell the difference?

Why does Sanders have $107 Million in his pockets?

Why do you care?

 

[Slade3200]

so then you want to take the position that he was just misinformed? He really thought all our troops were out of Syria?!

wow, that’s a big mess up. Who do you think he fired once he found out that he was given the wrong information to innocently pass along to the American public?

Don't be stupid. He was not misinformed and he did not lie, he was merely careless in his speech. His intent at that time was to withdraw all our troops from Syria and he spoke as if it had already been accomplished. What he should have said is, all of our troops will soon be withdrawn from Syria, or we are in the process of withdrawing all our troops from Syria. This was careless speech, not a lie, and you need to label it a lie says you have no idea why you hate President Trump so much.

so he knew there were troops in Syria but said twice in one sentence that there were NO troops in Syria. But that’s not a lie because he really meant to say that he was intending on withdrawing the troops. Ohh ok. How’d that withdrawal go? And how do you know what he was intending to say?

more importantly why are you trying so hard to spin and dismiss obvious lies?!

lol It is obviously not a lie since there is no rational basis for believing he intended to deceive the public. What is obvious from your posts is that you have no idea why you hate President Trump so much.

I don’t hate trump at all mr mind reader. I’ve been a trump fan for a long time on an entertainment level. On a political and leadership level he is the worst I’ve ever seen

Apparently you haven't seen much or you wouldn't be embarrassing yourself by picking at trivial statements to justify your hate.

I’m not trying to justify my hate, I’m responding to a question that was asked of me by another poster to show when Trump has lied. Yes there are really people out there who think that Trump doesn’t lie

 

[Slade3200]

so then you want to take the position that he was just misinformed? He really thought all our troops were out of Syria?!

wow, that’s a big mess up. Who do you think he fired once he found out that he was given the wrong information to innocently pass along to the American public?

Don't be stupid. He was not misinformed and he did not lie, he was merely careless in his speech. His intent at that time was to withdraw all our troops from Syria and he spoke as if it had already been accomplished. What he should have said is, all of our troops will soon be withdrawn from Syria, or we are in the process of withdrawing all our troops from Syria. This was careless speech, not a lie, and you need to label it a lie says you have no idea why you hate President Trump so much.

so he knew there were troops in Syria but said twice in one sentence that there were NO troops in Syria. But that’s not a lie because he really meant to say that he was intending on withdrawing the troops. Ohh ok. How’d that withdrawal go? And how do you know what he was intending to say?

more importantly why are you trying so hard to spin and dismiss obvious lies?!

lol It is obviously not a lie since there is no rational basis for believing he intended to deceive the public. What is obvious from your posts is that you have no idea why you hate President Trump so much.

What do you mean no rational basis. He wanted to project victory and follow through with his campaign promises. So he said he beat ISIS and pulled all troops out. It’s very simple. Just not true.

Again, no rational basis for thinking he was lying. There would be no discernable difference in benefit from saying the troops are all out than in saying the troops will soon all be out.

He doesn’t need a discernible difference in benefit. He is either telling to truth or not. What he said wasn’t the truth. It’s either a lie or he was misinformed. If he was misinformed then he is incompetent

 

[Slade3200]

are you really that delusional that you honestly can’t hear a lie when there’s a lie?! That is insane! Ok you want an example? One of the thousands... here you go.

Trump said several times on camera that California admitted to a million fraudulent/illegal votes in a lawsuit brought on by Judicial watch. That is a straight up lie. The lawsuit was about clearing voter rolls not admitting to fraudulent votes.

Here is Trumps quote from meet the press, though he has several other sound bites making the same false accusation...


Trump: "Take a look at Judicial Watch. Take a look at their settlement. California admitted to a million votes. They admitted to a million votes."

Todd: "A million votes of what?"

Trump: "Take a look at Judicial …

Todd: "What are you talking about?"

Trump: "Judicial Watch made a settlement. There was …"

Todd: "About what?"

Trump: "There was much illegal voting."


Trump cited a January settlement California reached with the conservative group Judicial Watch. It requires Los Angeles County election officials to remove inactive registrations from voter rolls to comply with federal law.

The 20-page settlement document, however, notes all parties agreed there was no admission of liability or wrongdoing by the state or county. It makes no mention of voter fraud or illegal voting.

There is no evidence of this being a lie. It looks like just a matter of some complexity, where Trump may have simply gotten things wrong. I say MAY, because I'm familiar with Judicial Watch, and for them to engage in a voting matter in California that does not involve illegal voting, sounds extremely unlikely. If I had to bet on it, my money would be that Trump was 100% right, and anybody who questions illegal voting in California, is awfully stupid, or a damn liar.

I'm not buying this one. Got anything else ?

No you don’t get to excuse a lie for him accidentally getting things wrong in this case.

Trump knew that California did not admit to a million illegal votes because they never did. He made that up. And it is significant. Because he is the president of the United States and the accusation that there were millions of illegal votes undermines public confidence in our institutions and electoral process. It also stirs the divide in immigration issues. Facts are important. Trump didnt use them, he went political. He lied

Whoa! You are saying that there were NOT "millions of illegal votes" ? Where do you get that from? Upon what do you base THAT statement ?

As for confidence in our electoral process, why should we have that, when not a single state has a citizenship proof requirement for voting ?

Nice try to spin but no I never did that. I simply said that what Trump said was not true. The lawsuit that he said showed California admitted to a million illegal votes did not say that. He lied so that dupes would believe that California admitted to a million illegal votes. It was a pathetic lie

 

[Slade3200]

How about last November when Trump lied about our troops in Syria... can you tell me any time during Trumps presidency when we had no troops in Syria? Cause Trump can... except for he was lying.

"Look, we have no soldiers in Syria. We've won. We've beat ISIS. And we've beat them badly and decisively. We have no soldiers."

As usual Trump bashers spinning inaccuracies (depending on one's definitions), into lies, and labeling them that way.

Wanna talk about all the spin lies of the Trump bashers about McCain, Hollywood Access, and Khzir Khan ? We could do that.

Not really... I’d rather talk about the examples I laid out and supported with actual quotes that you are trying to spin away from.

I’m sorry to tell you but knowingly stating inaccuracies and a spin job way of describing a flat out lie. Unless your claiming he was misinformed about a lawsuit that he could have easily read, medical effects of windmill noise, and our troop presence in Syria. Or the thousands of other examples just like this that I could lay out.

So I’ll give you this, he is either severely misinformed, or incompetent of understanding simple facts in which case he would t be lying but would but grossly incapable of executing his position... or the obvious case. He knowingly lies and fabricates stories for political benefit.

That's what you're doing here right now, just like the media did with the Access Hollywood video. You ought to be happy that Trump took the pitiful 2016 economy failure, and turned it into a success.

Are you done talking about Trumps lies because it seems like you’re trying to change the subject. Have you seen the light? Admit Trump lies and I’ll be happy to discuss the economy if you’d like.

 

[protectionist]

You're being silly. These are inaccurate statements that have no significance. A lie is when you make what you know to be a false statement with the intent to deceive.

No it’s not. He is the commander and chief, he is trying to tell the American people that we beat Isis and no longer have troops in Syria when there were around 600 troops out there risking their lives while their families wait and pray for them. It was a lie and a careless one at that

Arguably we did defeat ISIS because we did destroy their Caliphate, and while not all troops had left Syria, at that time the intent was to withdraw them, so it was perhaps a careless statement, but there is no rational basis for claiming he intended to deceive the public. You want to try to justify this irrational hate you have for the President and you are desperately picking away at trivial statements to do so.

I could explain why your argument doesn’t accurately dispute trumps lie about the situation but the best argument is to simply read Trumps statement again. Read what he said and then reread your last statement. It’s embarrassing

“Look, we have no soldiers in Syria. We've won. We've beat ISIS. And we've beat them badly and decisively. We have no soldiers."

It was a careless statement. At the time the intent was to withdraw all our soldiers and he spoke as if it had already been accomplished; very careless for people like you who are trying to organize a lynch mob, but there is no rational basis for assuming he intended to deceive the public.

See you’re trying to go after me for not accurately calling out Trump and in the same breath accuse me of trying to organize a lynch mob!! Haha. You can’t have it both ways. It’s either fine to be inaccurate, careless, and hyperbolic with your statements or it’s not. If it’s fine for trump then it’s fine the the lynch mobbers and it was fine for Obama and it’s fine for the media and the democrats.

the problem with your argument is you can’t get away from the facts. The facts are that what he said was not true. You don’t want to call it a lie because you picked the bad side of this argument and you’re trying to win... so instead of calling it a lie, you call it careless or inaccurate.... well it’s the same thing!!! It wasn’t true, he knew it wasn’t true, he said it anyway to the press for the word to hear!

We can do this for thousands of other statements. He does it almost every time he speaks. It is becoming the norm. You don’t see how messed up that is?!

But like all liberals, you distort Trump's words, just as they were distorted in the Access Hollywood video. If I said I got hundreds of robocalls today, would I be lying ? It's just a metaphor.

No, I didn't get "hundreds" of calls, but people know what I mean. A lot of phone calls.

 

[protectionist]

are you really that delusional that you honestly can’t hear a lie when there’s a lie?! That is insane! Ok you want an example? One of the thousands... here you go.

Trump said several times on camera that California admitted to a million fraudulent/illegal votes in a lawsuit brought on by Judicial watch. That is a straight up lie. The lawsuit was about clearing voter rolls not admitting to fraudulent votes.

Here is Trumps quote from meet the press, though he has several other sound bites making the same false accusation...


Trump: "Take a look at Judicial Watch. Take a look at their settlement. California admitted to a million votes. They admitted to a million votes."

Todd: "A million votes of what?"

Trump: "Take a look at Judicial …

Todd: "What are you talking about?"

Trump: "Judicial Watch made a settlement. There was …"

Todd: "About what?"

Trump: "There was much illegal voting."


Trump cited a January settlement California reached with the conservative group Judicial Watch. It requires Los Angeles County election officials to remove inactive registrations from voter rolls to comply with federal law.

The 20-page settlement document, however, notes all parties agreed there was no admission of liability or wrongdoing by the state or county. It makes no mention of voter fraud or illegal voting.

There is no evidence of this being a lie. It looks like just a matter of some complexity, where Trump may have simply gotten things wrong. I say MAY, because I'm familiar with Judicial Watch, and for them to engage in a voting matter in California that does not involve illegal voting, sounds extremely unlikely. If I had to bet on it, my money would be that Trump was 100% right, and anybody who questions illegal voting in California, is awfully stupid, or a damn liar.

I'm not buying this one. Got anything else ?

No you don’t get to excuse a lie for him accidentally getting things wrong in this case.

Trump knew that California did not admit to a million illegal votes because they never did. He made that up. And it is significant. Because he is the president of the United States and the accusation that there were millions of illegal votes undermines public confidence in our institutions and electoral process. It also stirs the divide in immigration issues. Facts are important. Trump didnt use them, he went political. He lied

Whoa! You are saying that there were NOT "millions of illegal votes" ? Where do you get that from? Upon what do you base THAT statement ?

As for confidence in our electoral process, why should we have that, when not a single state has a citizenship proof requirement for voting ?

Nice try to spin but no I never did that. I simply said that what Trump said was not true. The lawsuit that he said showed California admitted to a million illegal votes did not say that. He lied so that dupes would believe that California admitted to a million illegal votes. It was a pathetic lie

Dodge! I gave no spin. My post that you quoted, asked 4 Questions. You didn't answer a single one.
And these questions are far more important than your little lawsuit scenario.

 

[protectionist]

How about last November when Trump lied about our troops in Syria... can you tell me any time during Trumps presidency when we had no troops in Syria? Cause Trump can... except for he was lying.

"Look, we have no soldiers in Syria. We've won. We've beat ISIS. And we've beat them badly and decisively. We have no soldiers."

As usual Trump bashers spinning inaccuracies (depending on one's definitions), into lies, and labeling them that way.

Wanna talk about all the spin lies of the Trump bashers about McCain, Hollywood Access, and Khzir Khan ? We could do that.

Not really... I’d rather talk about the examples I laid out and supported with actual quotes that you are trying to spin away from.

I’m sorry to tell you but knowingly stating inaccuracies and a spin job way of describing a flat out lie. Unless your claiming he was misinformed about a lawsuit that he could have easily read, medical effects of windmill noise, and our troop presence in Syria. Or the thousands of other examples just like this that I could lay out.

So I’ll give you this, he is either severely misinformed, or incompetent of understanding simple facts in which case he would t be lying but would but grossly incapable of executing his position... or the obvious case. He knowingly lies and fabricates stories for political benefit.

That's what you're doing here right now, just like the media did with the Access Hollywood video. You ought to be happy that Trump took the pitiful 2016 economy failure, and turned it into a success.

Are you done talking about Trumps lies because it seems like you’re trying to change the subject. Have you seen the light? Admit Trump lies and I’ll be happy to discuss the economy if you’d like.

No, I haven't seen you produce anything constituting a lie. Only lies I'm seeing are yours, deliberately exaggerating slight errors to make them appear as lies.
As for the subject, it appears to be political lies, and you ran away from those told by Democrats. Just the Hillary tv ads and campaign were a litany of them (Muslim gold star father, outsourcing ties, McCain, Access Hollywood video, etc)

 

[bripat9643]

The Poll actually asks how much Money it will Cost The Dems to Buy The White House regardless of who is the nominee.

Below I will post "Candidate Committee Money" This does not take in to account Dark Money, or people who fund their campaigns with their own money.

Bernie Sanders has $100 Million, and guess what, this is a good way to get rich. They don't actually have to give that money back when their campaigns are over if they don't spend it all.

They are no longer allowed to keep it.

 

[Slade3200]

No it’s not. He is the commander and chief, he is trying to tell the American people that we beat Isis and no longer have troops in Syria when there were around 600 troops out there risking their lives while their families wait and pray for them. It was a lie and a careless one at that

Arguably we did defeat ISIS because we did destroy their Caliphate, and while not all troops had left Syria, at that time the intent was to withdraw them, so it was perhaps a careless statement, but there is no rational basis for claiming he intended to deceive the public. You want to try to justify this irrational hate you have for the President and you are desperately picking away at trivial statements to do so.

I could explain why your argument doesn’t accurately dispute trumps lie about the situation but the best argument is to simply read Trumps statement again. Read what he said and then reread your last statement. It’s embarrassing

“Look, we have no soldiers in Syria. We've won. We've beat ISIS. And we've beat them badly and decisively. We have no soldiers."

It was a careless statement. At the time the intent was to withdraw all our soldiers and he spoke as if it had already been accomplished; very careless for people like you who are trying to organize a lynch mob, but there is no rational basis for assuming he intended to deceive the public.

See you’re trying to go after me for not accurately calling out Trump and in the same breath accuse me of trying to organize a lynch mob!! Haha. You can’t have it both ways. It’s either fine to be inaccurate, careless, and hyperbolic with your statements or it’s not. If it’s fine for trump then it’s fine the the lynch mobbers and it was fine for Obama and it’s fine for the media and the democrats.

the problem with your argument is you can’t get away from the facts. The facts are that what he said was not true. You don’t want to call it a lie because you picked the bad side of this argument and you’re trying to win... so instead of calling it a lie, you call it careless or inaccurate.... well it’s the same thing!!! It wasn’t true, he knew it wasn’t true, he said it anyway to the press for the word to hear!

We can do this for thousands of other statements. He does it almost every time he speaks. It is becoming the norm. You don’t see how messed up that is?!

But like all liberals, you distort Trump's words, just as they were distorted in the Access Hollywood video. If I said I got hundreds of robocalls today, would I be lying ? It's just a metaphor.

No, I didn't get "hundreds" of calls, but people know what I mean. A lot of phone calls.

Oops, that line doesn’t work because I used actual quotes from Trump. No distortion. Pull another lame excuse out of the bucket if you can find one.

 

[Slade3200]

are you really that delusional that you honestly can’t hear a lie when there’s a lie?! That is insane! Ok you want an example? One of the thousands... here you go.

Trump said several times on camera that California admitted to a million fraudulent/illegal votes in a lawsuit brought on by Judicial watch. That is a straight up lie. The lawsuit was about clearing voter rolls not admitting to fraudulent votes.

Here is Trumps quote from meet the press, though he has several other sound bites making the same false accusation...


Trump: "Take a look at Judicial Watch. Take a look at their settlement. California admitted to a million votes. They admitted to a million votes."

Todd: "A million votes of what?"

Trump: "Take a look at Judicial …

Todd: "What are you talking about?"

Trump: "Judicial Watch made a settlement. There was …"

Todd: "About what?"

Trump: "There was much illegal voting."


Trump cited a January settlement California reached with the conservative group Judicial Watch. It requires Los Angeles County election officials to remove inactive registrations from voter rolls to comply with federal law.

The 20-page settlement document, however, notes all parties agreed there was no admission of liability or wrongdoing by the state or county. It makes no mention of voter fraud or illegal voting.

There is no evidence of this being a lie. It looks like just a matter of some complexity, where Trump may have simply gotten things wrong. I say MAY, because I'm familiar with Judicial Watch, and for them to engage in a voting matter in California that does not involve illegal voting, sounds extremely unlikely. If I had to bet on it, my money would be that Trump was 100% right, and anybody who questions illegal voting in California, is awfully stupid, or a damn liar.

I'm not buying this one. Got anything else ?

No you don’t get to excuse a lie for him accidentally getting things wrong in this case.

Trump knew that California did not admit to a million illegal votes because they never did. He made that up. And it is significant. Because he is the president of the United States and the accusation that there were millions of illegal votes undermines public confidence in our institutions and electoral process. It also stirs the divide in immigration issues. Facts are important. Trump didnt use them, he went political. He lied

Whoa! You are saying that there were NOT "millions of illegal votes" ? Where do you get that from? Upon what do you base THAT statement ?

As for confidence in our electoral process, why should we have that, when not a single state has a citizenship proof requirement for voting ?

Nice try to spin but no I never did that. I simply said that what Trump said was not true. The lawsuit that he said showed California admitted to a million illegal votes did not say that. He lied so that dupes would believe that California admitted to a million illegal votes. It was a pathetic lie

Dodge! I gave no spin. My post that you quoted, asked 4 Questions. You didn't answer a single one.
And these questions are far more important than your little lawsuit scenario.

My very first sentence answered your very first question... and now you say I didn’t answer a single question? I think you caught whatever Trump has... Lyingitis I believe it’s called

 

[Slade3200]

How about last November when Trump lied about our troops in Syria... can you tell me any time during Trumps presidency when we had no troops in Syria? Cause Trump can... except for he was lying.

"Look, we have no soldiers in Syria. We've won. We've beat ISIS. And we've beat them badly and decisively. We have no soldiers."

As usual Trump bashers spinning inaccuracies (depending on one's definitions), into lies, and labeling them that way.

Wanna talk about all the spin lies of the Trump bashers about McCain, Hollywood Access, and Khzir Khan ? We could do that.

Not really... I’d rather talk about the examples I laid out and supported with actual quotes that you are trying to spin away from.

I’m sorry to tell you but knowingly stating inaccuracies and a spin job way of describing a flat out lie. Unless your claiming he was misinformed about a lawsuit that he could have easily read, medical effects of windmill noise, and our troop presence in Syria. Or the thousands of other examples just like this that I could lay out.

So I’ll give you this, he is either severely misinformed, or incompetent of understanding simple facts in which case he would t be lying but would but grossly incapable of executing his position... or the obvious case. He knowingly lies and fabricates stories for political benefit.

That's what you're doing here right now, just like the media did with the Access Hollywood video. You ought to be happy that Trump took the pitiful 2016 economy failure, and turned it into a success.

Are you done talking about Trumps lies because it seems like you’re trying to change the subject. Have you seen the light? Admit Trump lies and I’ll be happy to discuss the economy if you’d like.

No, I haven't seen you produce anything constituting a lie. Only lies I'm seeing are yours, deliberately exaggerating slight errors to make them appear as lies.
As for the subject, it appears to be political lies, and you ran away from those told by Democrats. Just the Hillary tv ads and campaign were a litany of them (Muslim gold star father, outsourcing ties, McCain, Access Hollywood video, etc)

I laid out 3 very blatant lies. I used Trumps actual words in quotes and then provided proof that they were lies. You couldn’t counter any of them so now you’re playing dumb and trying to change the subject to Hillary?! Are you kidding me? How pathetic.... grow up.

 

[The Original Tree]

The Poll actually asks how much Money it will Cost The Dems to Buy The White House regardless of who is the nominee.

Below I will post "Candidate Committee Money" This does not take in to account Dark Money, or people who fund their campaigns with their own money.

Bernie Sanders has $100 Million, and guess what, this is a good way to get rich. They don't actually have to give that money back when their campaigns are over if they don't spend it all.

They are no longer allowed to keep it.

They actually can hide it in different types of accounts associated with campaigning, politics, and political messaging, and then they siphon money off of those funds for personal expenses.

The swamp isn't drained yet.

 

[The Original Tree]

As usual Trump bashers spinning inaccuracies (depending on one's definitions), into lies, and labeling them that way.

Wanna talk about all the spin lies of the Trump bashers about McCain, Hollywood Access, and Khzir Khan ? We could do that.

Not really... I’d rather talk about the examples I laid out and supported with actual quotes that you are trying to spin away from.

I’m sorry to tell you but knowingly stating inaccuracies and a spin job way of describing a flat out lie. Unless your claiming he was misinformed about a lawsuit that he could have easily read, medical effects of windmill noise, and our troop presence in Syria. Or the thousands of other examples just like this that I could lay out.

So I’ll give you this, he is either severely misinformed, or incompetent of understanding simple facts in which case he would t be lying but would but grossly incapable of executing his position... or the obvious case. He knowingly lies and fabricates stories for political benefit.

That's what you're doing here right now, just like the media did with the Access Hollywood video. You ought to be happy that Trump took the pitiful 2016 economy failure, and turned it into a success.

Are you done talking about Trumps lies because it seems like you’re trying to change the subject. Have you seen the light? Admit Trump lies and I’ll be happy to discuss the economy if you’d like.

No, I haven't seen you produce anything constituting a lie. Only lies I'm seeing are yours, deliberately exaggerating slight errors to make them appear as lies.
As for the subject, it appears to be political lies, and you ran away from those told by Democrats. Just the Hillary tv ads and campaign were a litany of them (Muslim gold star father, outsourcing ties, McCain, Access Hollywood video, etc)

I laid out 3 very blatant lies. I used Trumps actual words in quotes and then provided proof that they were lies. You couldn’t counter any of them so now you’re playing dumb and trying to change the subject to Hillary?! Are you kidding me? How pathetic.... grow up.

You offered No Proof Comrade. Trump will be dragged out of the White House any day now, in handcuffs.

Any

Day

Now