Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. Mccain would have still been the lesser of two evils for the right and now he's picked a radical that couldn't possibly have our confidence. Moderates are turned off by the moral minority. Bush was radical enough and palin is worse. And mccain is 70 and has had malinoma 3 times. She is not an option.
Also, I love that ppl suggest obama is extremely liberal. Same thing they said about clinton. And they truly believe we would run a far left candidate. Wouldn't fly. But they repeat this lie over and over.
Ya the right is gonna forget all Obama's socialist ideas, his attempts to destroy what business we have left, his new entitlement programs and the new taxes he will create to pay for them. His dismantling of the Military, his selling out to other nations, despots and terrorists. All will be peaches and cream with Obama in the White House.
Ohh did I mention those of us on the right will forget the last 8 years of the left calling us ignorant monkeys and sheep?
No. You don't become the most Liberal Senator by being bipartisan. McCain is obviously the better choice in this matter because he has a history of crossing the aisle. However, my hope is that the liberals in Congress will get voted out in 2010 and then Obama will have to cooperate with Conservatives. Obama is a great speaker, but he needs direction. A conservative Congress can provide that for him.
I respectfully disagree.
Obama's own voting record indicates that he has been extremely liberal, so that is not open to debate.
You forget that Clinton was extremely liberal until Conservatives took over Congress in November of '94. After that, he had no choice but to move to the center. Obama is already demonstrating that he is capable of doing that as well, although it'll take a Republican-controlled Congress to make it happen.
Oh its open to debate. Voting against war funding doesn't make you liberal, but that's how you judge that vote. Why doesn't that make him fiscally responsible.
And he voted for fisa. That doesnt make him conservative. I know the reasins behind their votes. Do you? Do you know what crap might have been in those bills?
Anyways, anything anti "conservative" is ok with me.
Liberal is not a dirty word anyways. Their right about almost everything. Even groups like the aflcio, naacp, greenpiece, pita or other far left groups have good points about them.
I'm looking forward to america being more liberal on many issues.
Maybe now we can see janet jacksons breast in piece.
No, it's not open to debate. Obama is as liberal as they come.
I hope Liberal is not a dirty word, because that is exactly what I am. Liberals in societies from China to Iran to South Africa to Argentina are supporters of human rights and free markets. That's me. Unfortunately, its meaning has clearly been corrupted by contemporary American liberals.
Well he showed he can "go along" on fisa and the bailout.
And I like that he ran on an anti iraq platform back when that wasn't popular.
Anyways, I don't know what votes make him really really liberal. Please give me some examples. However, keep in mind I will research the details of these bills to get his explanations to why he voted for, against or present.
And again, if far left means as far as possible from the far right's positions, i'm cool with that.
Don't say partial birth abortion. Please use another example.
Thank god i'm too old and my nephews are too young.
But I got survival skills and weapons and friends with resources. No doubt we'll make a very strong militia. You guys got shotguns and 6 shooters.
ps. You talk about socialism but how free was the 8 yrs of free trade? $10 billion a month in war spending and $700 billion bailout. All taxpayer, treasury spending. They raped us and you defended them every step of the way. You and mccain.
Your run is over son. We tried it your way.
I think Obama would be better to do that. I'm not just saying that because I agree with him more than I agree with McCain, though. And had it just been McCain, I might have gone with him. (well, at least McCain 2K) The problem is that Palin's even more divisive than Bush/Cheney. She's unacceptable to a good chunk of the country and is even dividing your republican party. And the way McCain's run his campaign of late, I'm not even sure that it would be easy for HIM to act in a bi-partisan fashion anymore.
Partial birth abortion. Okay, just kidding.
It looks like you might have to pick up a copy of the National Journal because I can't seem to find a free copy of it online. Here's a sample:
NATIONAL JOURNAL: Obama: Most Liberal Senator in 2007 (01/31/2008)
Sarge! Good to see you here again! I had no idea you studied socialism. Tell me. Which of Obama's ideas are in line with collective ownership of corporations and setting a social unit price of American products and completely doing away with supply and demand?
I look forward to your response. This may alter my vote!
Again! Another new revelation! Which businesses has Obama stated he wishes to destory? Do you have a list? Any reasons?
Please elaborate on this too, Sarge. I need to know what Obama's new entitlement programs are.
New taxes? Obama is creating taxes that we've never had before? Are you serious? Show me the new tax brackets Obama is creating that we've never had before.
What will conservatives teach Obama? How to double the debt and tank the economy? How to not win two wars? How to be diplomatic with the rest of the world? Fix education? Privatize social security so the banks can collapse and renig on our life savings? How to pollute and deny global warming? How to protect the oil companies, double gas prices, jack up inflation. Stop stem cell research.
What will the conservatives contribute?
No. Mccain would have still been the lesser of two evils for the right and now he's picked a radical that couldn't possibly have our confidence. Moderates are turned off by the moral minority. Bush was radical enough and palin is worse. And mccain is 70 and has had malinoma 3 times. She is not an option.
Also, I love that ppl suggest obama is extremely liberal. Same thing they said about clinton. And they truly believe we would run a far left candidate. Wouldn't fly. But they repeat this lie over and over.
I refer you to 1995-2000. After that, the neoconservatives took over.
You are voting for a person and you do not even know their positions. Remind me again about how he is not for socialized medicine? Come on I know you can do it.
Remind me again how he is NOT going to try and raise taxes on all businesses and create wind fall tax rip offs? Come on I am sure you can explain it.
Remind me again how he has not proposed a trillion dollars in new social programs and has no way to pay for them except raising taxes? I am sure you can voodoo your way out of this one.
He has already proposed raising taxes and it won't even dent the new spending he wants all while balancing the budget and paying down the debt. He will raise taxes in a recession not just on business but the American citizen as well. Remind us how you lot have not preached right here on this board that his plans to steal from the rich are great ideas.
You are either a fool, a liar or stupid as shit. Which is it DavidS?
Therein began the problem, though. If they had just done their job and pulled where the pres pushed and pushed where he pulled, then maybe there would have been compromise. (Amazingly, in terms of legislation, there actually was a lot). But they also spent 70 million dollars on a witch hunt and I'm not sure I trust them not to do it again.
Just one problem with your tirade, The democrats in Congress went along with it ALL. Further THEY created and passed "THE "BAIL OUT". Must suck to be you and live in a fantasy world.
They created the bailout? If you mean took bush's plan to hand paulson $700 bill no questions asked and made it swallable, then yes they created the plan where we might someday get our money back. Fat chance, but at least it wasn't just a bank robbery.
And it was bush, delay, boehner, abramoff, hastert, chaney, vetter, rove, scooter, foley, craig, stevens, gramm and lieberman that deregulated, sent jobs oversea and let big oil gouge us. 6 yrs in power did this. Not the last 2 and not carter or clinton
But nice try.
Say, why isn't iraq oil paying for the war yet? Bush and exxon want you to pay but don't have the balls to answer that question. Neither do you. Chaney lied when he said iraq oil would pay. You didn't care because you are brainwashed. $10 bill x 12 mo x 10 yrs. Yikes! Vote for mccain and it'll be 12 or 16 if you elect him 2 times. What's 16 yrs times $120 billion a yr?
No wonder powell endorsed obama.