Yurt
Gold Member
So, what was the intent?
Ask the wikileaks founder. 2:1 says he's not going to say he was trying to sabotage our troops overseas. The clear wording of the law throughout is intent to hurt operations. If their intent was to let the American people see documents that they feel should be seen, then their intent is not to hurt American operations.
Well, it's easy for them to say that...
doesn't matter if they say that...modbert is wrong on the law
intent or reason to believe that the
information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to
the advantage of any foreign nation
don't you think number 2 would be fairly easy to prove, i know its a lot easier to prove than intent